Mef Beats Prod.
dark trap vocals
Evil can have many faces
maybe even yours
The Outsider
New from Stephen King
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
-------------------------------------------
Dark Souls 2: Vendrick - Duration: 9:25.
For more infomation >> Dark Souls 2: Vendrick - Duration: 9:25. -------------------------------------------
【Dark Souls】そうるノDarkSouls Ⅰ~Ⅲ通し配信 p10 - Duration: 2:28:35.
For more infomation >> 【Dark Souls】そうるノDarkSouls Ⅰ~Ⅲ通し配信 p10 - Duration: 2:28:35. -------------------------------------------
Top five Dark Souls 3 BOSS # ITA - Duration: 10:13.
For more infomation >> Top five Dark Souls 3 BOSS # ITA - Duration: 10:13. -------------------------------------------
Dark + Dangerous Thoughts - Duration: 1:00.
Nobody talks to these people.
These are the people that actually make history.
These are the people that change the way that we live.
But often no one has ever heard of them.
We wanted to put them on stage and let them tell their stories.
Also because I think that their stories will make us question what we think
and make us question assumptions that we make.
When someone tells you something you don't agree with
but they tell it to you from the position of having lived it,
I think it's harder to be unsympathetic.
-------------------------------------------
20 Years Later: A dark day in the history of the Tampa Police Department - Duration: 1:48.
For more infomation >> 20 Years Later: A dark day in the history of the Tampa Police Department - Duration: 1:48. -------------------------------------------
[FREE] Hard Dark 808 Hip Hop Beat Rap Instrumental 2018 #175 | Free Beats By MR. HODEN ► - Duration: 3:36.
WANNA BUY THIS BEAT? CONTACT ME ON FACEBOOK OR GMAIL!
-------------------------------------------
Vlog: I'll Be Gone In The Dark by Michelle McNamara - Duration: 7:34.
Hi it's Naomi back with another vlog for you guys. Today I'm gonna be talking
about I'll Be Gone In The Dark by Michelle McNamara. This book fits into
the true crime genre, it's essentially one woman's quest for the identity of
the Golden State Killer. There are some unusual circumstances surrounding the
book as the author died before the work could be completed so her friends and
family and researchers got together and completed the book for her. The foreword
is by the author of Gone Girl, Gillian Flynn and the afterword is by Michelle's
husband, the actor Patton Oswalt. Just a quick kind of note on their relationship:
They speak, she speaks a fair bit about her marriage in the book and the
kind of juxtaposition between their two different lifestyles. On one hand you
have Patton Oswalt with the glitz and glamour of Hollywood and premieres and
on the other hand you have Michelle who writes about these you know really
graphic, dark side of humanity true crime cases. I noticed when I first started
recommending the book and talking about it that I kept referring to the author
by her first name. I think that's because you get a sense that you really know her.
It's a testament to how well put together the book is. As much as this
book is an investigation into the Golden State Killer
it's also partially a biography of Michelle McNamara herself. You feel like
you know so much more about her after reading this, you know, all of the family
and friendships are in here and also even the relationships she had
with the retired detectives who she called up to get more information about
the case. That's what makes this book so much more than your just
standard true-crime title. There's a lot of deeper levels to it.
Michelle talks about having an interest in true crime from an early age,
she details her own first experience with violent crime. She used to run a
true crime blog but the the case that she really latched on to was that
of the Golden State Killer. He was an offender
who started off as a prowler or a Peeping Tom and then his crimes
escalated to rape and finally murder. These crimes she details, although she's very
honest about what happened she deals with it quite sensitively as well.
Obviously she maintains the anonymity of anyone who wished to remain
anonymous, but at the same time she gives you a real feel for the fear in the
community at the time and also the the general feel in America at that
point. She shows us that at that point America was going
through a wave of violence. It's post Vietnam war, Taxi Driver
everyone was talking about at the time. People sort of lived in
fear a little bit and particularly in this area of California. She said that
guns were getting sold at an alarming rate, people were putting
tambourines and wind chimes all over their windows and doors so that
hopefully the offender couldn't get into their home at night, couples slept in
shifts because this offender was so indiscriminate he didn't care if
he was attacking couples or single people. And he was so cocky that he
even attacked homes where people had already started to phone the police so
that just gives you an idea for how frightening the time must have been for
the local residents. I think she transmits that state of fear really well.
You feel Michelle's sense of dogged determination, as every lead that she's
investigating runs cold she's just not gonna let this go, she's gonna keep on
trying, she's gonna keep on trying to crack this case. And she even goes to the
effort of collecting 30 odd boxes of police files from the local police
department. She phones up detectives who have since retired who worked the case
originally because she knows they're just as haunted by the case as she is.
Another unique thing about my experience reading this book is that they
actually caught the Golden State Killer whilst I was reading it. They
actually have a DNA match for the suspect so it's really looking like it
definitely is him. The police actually credited I'll Be Gone In The Dark with
keeping the case in the public mind, helping get more information out there,
more public awareness, so that's you know that's been a really great testament to
Michelle's work. So many of the things that she mentions in the book actually
come together when you know the identity of the killer. So many small bits of
information that she thought were important have actually turned out to be.
So again a testament to her work and her work ethic as I've said. It was a really
unique experience reading this book just because of some of the circumstances
surrounding it and I think obviously with the case being ongoing against the
suspect they have a DNA match for there's going to be a lot more about
this case in the next couple of years. So I would recommend that anyone who's
interested in kind of a topical issue like that, pick it up. It is a very
sophisticated true crime novel I would say it's going to end up up there with
In Cold Blood, A Stranger Beside Me as one of those true crime classics. I'm
really glad that I sat down to read it, it did leave a kind of a permanent mark
on me in some ways because I don't think I'm the first reviewer to say that it
actually made me a bit afraid for my own personal safety. I don't really feel
comfortable sleeping with a window open now; that's the level of detail. Anyone
who is interested in the crime genre, true crime, anyone who just likes to kind
of follow things that are going on in the media, this is a fantastic book and
although I'm sorry that Michelle McNamara is not around to see the
success of her book I think she would be so happy that finally this man that
she's been chasing the ghost of for years has been caught. And she even says
in her book that she doesn't care who catches him as long as someone does.
She didn't want to be the star she just wanted justice for his victims and I
think that this book is such a success that it will be remembered for a long time
to come. I would honestly recommend it far and wide. So thank you very much for
listening to me talk about this today. If you want to hear more from me, more from
the other vloggers, please do subscribe to our channel and I will see you next time.
Goodbye!
-------------------------------------------
"OD" Dark Trap Beat Instrumental 2018 | Hard Lit Dope Rap Hiphop Freestyle Trap Type Beats | Free DL - Duration: 3:23.
"OD" Dark Trap Beat Instrumental 2018 | Hard Lit Dope Rap Hiphop Freestyle Trap Type Beats | Free DL
-------------------------------------------
Pyrodox - Lovers In The Dark (ft. Oisin) [Lyrics] - Duration: 2:38.
♪ Breathe it in, fire up ♪
♪ Take my hand and we'll run away ♪
♪ Falling fast, from the start ♪
♪ Light the flame no matter where we are ♪
♪ They'll never tell us no, no, no ♪
♪ Now we're gonna show, show, show ♪
♪ We're living our dreams now, living our dreams now ♪
♪ We could be lovers in the dark ♪
♪ A thousand electric hearts ♪
♪ We'll never lose our neon spark ♪
♪ We're gonna light it up again, light it up again ♪
♪ We could be lovers ♪
♪ We could be lovers ♪
♪ Shooting stars, fall again ♪
♪ Shining bright now wish away ♪
♪ All your fears, all your pain ♪
♪ Find the hope, like diamonds in the rain ♪
♪ Whoa, whoa, whoa, now we're gonna show, show, show ♪
♪ We're living our dreams now, living our dreams now ♪
♪ We could be lovers in the dark ♪
♪ A thousand electric hearts ♪
♪ We'll never lose our neon spark ♪
♪ We're gonna light it up again, light it up again ♪
♪ We could be lovers ♪
♪ We could be lovers ♪
-------------------------------------------
The Intellectual Dark Web: What's Next? - Duration: 10:45.
I'm sure by now all of you have seen the NY Times article on The Intellectual Dark Web.
The article was a heavy lift, trying to define something that previously had been undefined,
but was a solid foray into the mainstream for this eclectic group of people.
For the record, I believe the Intellectual Dark Web is defined as a diverse group of
thinkers, interviewers, comedians and academics who have been thrust together due to intellectual
curiosity, a desire for truth, and an absolute respect for an audience's ability to make
up their minds on their own.
There's an old Groucho Marx line, 'I wouldn't want to belong to a club that would have me
as a member.'
At first, that was how I felt about this whole Intellectual Dark Web.
We've had a pretty good thing going with this loosely associated group of free thinkers,
so why muck it up with something more formal?
I've come to see though, is this alliance, whether we have membership cards and a clubhouse
or not, is now one of the most important forces for reason that exists.
This crew of people, from Harris to the Weinstein Brothers, and from Shapiro to Sommers, have
all come from different walks of life, from different academic and career backgrounds.
What I believe to be the one unifier in this group is we haven't been going for easy answers
that make good soundbites but offer little real world value.
We've all tried, with success and sometimes failure, to communicate ideas the mainstream
media has either ignored of misrepresented because they often go against mainstream orthodoxy.
For example, Sam Harris has tried to make a clear distinction between ideas and people,
and why we must be able to criticize ideas such as Islam without becoming bigoted toward
Muslim people.
Progressive Bret Weinstein tried to show a progressive university that fighting racism
through racist acts, a day of absence at school for white people, was actually itself racist
. Ben Shapiro has brought basic ideas of conservatism to a younger generation that is being indoctrinated
with postmodern viewpoints.
Christina has tried to show people the original intention of feminism, a true equality for
women, has morphed into something about authoritarianism rather than equality.
All of these conversations are important ones to have because without conversation on important
issues the only option left is violence.
It doesn't mean you have to agree with anyone or everyone in this group of people, and they
themselves disagree on many issues with each other, but the failure of the mainstream to
honestly and maturely talk about these topics is exactly what drove so many of you guys
to us in the first place.
Contrary to many of the think pieces written after the original Times piece, none of us
in this dark web view ourselves as victims -- actually, it's the total reverse.
We are empowered by our ideas, in my case belief in the individual, and want you to
be empowered fight for what you believe in as well... even when you disagree with us.
I do want to address a few questions related to my role in all of this discussion and how
I view myself, as well as The Rubin Report.
One of the criticisms by Bari Weiss in the Times article was in essence about the gatekeeping
responsibility she feels the members of The Intellectual Dark Web should have.
So where are the lines we draw as to who we talk to, and what are ideas which we won't
touch?
If a conversation we're having could lead you down a rabbit hole of unsavory people,
is it incumbent on us to guard against this journey, or is it on you as the viewer to
decide what ideas and which people cause you to draw your own line?
I think you know my position on this, but I'll say it again: I, as an individual, make
the choices which I think are intellectually honest, and I then believe it is on you, the
viewer, as an individual, to decide which people and ideas you like or dislike, and
then follow up on these people and ideas yourself.
I've always felt this was the right way to look at being an interviewer, but I know that
not everyone agrees with this premise, including some people I like and respect.
I also have said many times before, along the way of making these decisions, I may make
mistakes, but I'll always try to do what I think is right.
There's also an interesting guilt by association situation developing here.
My friend and mentor Larry King could spend a week in 1994 interviewing David Duke, Louis
Farakhan, the cast of Seinfeld, Michael Jordan and Frank Sinatra.
Nobody in their right mind felt that meant he was friends with, or endorsed all of those
people's views.
Somehow, and maybe this is just partly because of YouTube and social media, these days if
you even talk to someone, a certain segment of people think this automatically means you
stand by everything they've said and done.
I view this as patently absurd, and actually quite dangerous.
We have to be willing to push the sensible boundaries of people we are willing to talk
to, otherwise we're just talking to ourselves futhering the echo chamber mentality that
mainstream media fosters.
This brings me to a couple of people who I've had conversations with.
I seem to get most guff from having two specific people on The Rubin Report, as well as one
interview I did outside of the show.
I had Mike Cernovich on The Rubin Report in March of 2016, right when the Trump phenomenon
was breaking through.
At the time, I saw a lot of support for Trump online, but couldn't find any mainstream people
willing to talk about it.
Cernovich was one of the few vocal supporters of Trump, was a published author, and was
catching fire on social media.
My conversation with Mike was totally civil and actually quite interesting to me, as I
hadn't heard anyone articulate sensible support for Trump before then.
As the next two years unfolded, Cernovich was a central figure in conspiracies such
as Pizza Gate, while also being at the front of Hillary's health issues, which the media
ignored until she passed out in front of her SUV on that fall day in 2016.
Let's not forget that Donna Brazille actually confirmed Cenrovich's reporting when she said
the DNC was actually thinking about replacing Hillary at once point during the campaign.
I didn't know about some of Mike's distatesful blog posts which were written before I sat
down with him, and I certainly can't be held accountable for what anyone does after they've
been on the show.
What I CAN be held accountable for is the way I conduct myself in an interview with
a controversial person, which thus far I'm absolutely proud of.
One of the reasons I wasn't surprised by the election of Trump was because of that very
conversation with Cenrovich.
So, while mainstream media ignored figures which were deemed deplorable and felt Hillary
was a shoe-in, I dared have the conversations which allowed me (and hopefully you?) to see
the future more clearly.
The other interview which people were upset by was my chat with Stefan Molyneaux.
Stefan is heavily focused on Race and IQ, which not a discussion I'm a pro at, nor one
that I care to focus on at all.
Actually, I asked him this very question during the interview: what is it about race and IQ
that he feels the need to talk about it so much.
His answer, in essence, was that he talks about it because he finds it so troubling.
His answer is for you the viewer to either accept or reject.
Perhaps I could've poked or prodded in another way, but I felt trying to figure out why he
thinks as he does is what my job was.
The other important one to address is that I did Alex Jones show back in February of
last year.
This was right after my "Why I Left the Left" video came out from Prager U., and I was getting
a ton of press requests.
That week I also did Tucker Carlson on Fox News, and would've been just as happy to do
MSNBC or CNN had they invited me.
My feeling as I've said in a couple livestreames since, was that if I went on Jones' show and
it was aired live and unedited, I might be able to bring my message of conversation and
classical liberalism to Jones' audience.
I know it worked by the way, because I've received dozens of messages from Jones' fans
who said how nice to was to hear a different perspective, and since then they've been challenged
by other interviews we do right here.
The criticism of course, is that I somehow legitimized Jones by doing his show in the
first place.
I don't see it that way myself, but I'm sympathetic to the argument, and as Uncle Ben said to
Peter Parker, with great power comes great responsibility.
I don't think a year ago I had great power, but as things have ramped up around here,
it appears these days I do.
I should also remind you that there are plenty of people who wouldn't want me to sit down
with Jordan Peterson because they say he's alt right, or Sam Harris because they say
he's anti Muslim... charges that I, and you, know not to be true.
This is the dangerous place we are in when we all act like the gatekeepers of others
capacity to make decisions for themselves.
With all this in mind, I'd like to offer up three Rubin Report Rules going forward.
1.
I will keep the focus more on ideas, than people.
This won't always be totally possible, but I'll always do my best to honor the principle.
2.
I will continue to interview potentially controversial people, but will increase my efforts to shed
light on ideas they have that I am concerned are unsavory.
I will give them a chance to explain themselves, as I believe sunlight is often the best disinfectant.
If I'm cordial to someone it doesn't mean I endorse them.
I think we're in danger of eliminating conversations that are necessary to understanding the big
picture because some of us, including myself, may feel compromised by listening.
Trump's election and and Brexit we're only surprises if you turned up your nose to listening
to half the electorate.
3 . I'll keep trying to build bridges in some places where others would reflexively burn
them down.
This is always tricky because I naturally don't want to legitimize bad actors, but I'll
always try to see if there's room to make inroads with someone where I may have been
trained to think they were a sworn enemy.
My bridges won't be built everywhere though, we've got to have some standards of decency
to make sure that the ideas we want to build upon here aren't sitting on a mound of quicksand.
As what we do here gets put more into the spotlight, I have more of a responsibility
to live up to the ideals that I've laid out here.
I'm never going to make everyone happy and its why at the end of the day I can only answer
to my own conscience.
I believe we are starting to win in the public square and this will now bring all sorts of
new people our way.
2018 is undoubtedly the year of Unusual Alliances.
The invites have been sent out, so now let's see who shows up to the party.
-------------------------------------------
THE OUTSIDER Knižní trailer 2 (2018) CZ TIT | Planet Dark - Duration: 0:31.
For more infomation >> THE OUTSIDER Knižní trailer 2 (2018) CZ TIT | Planet Dark - Duration: 0:31. -------------------------------------------
Dark Crimes - Movie - Duration: 1:32:59.
For more infomation >> Dark Crimes - Movie - Duration: 1:32:59. -------------------------------------------
Season 3 Episode 2: Whispers in the Dark - Duration: 44:21.
For more infomation >> Season 3 Episode 2: Whispers in the Dark - Duration: 44:21. -------------------------------------------
【Dark Souls】そうるノDarkSouls Ⅰ~Ⅲ通し配信 p11 - Duration: 2:02:09.
For more infomation >> 【Dark Souls】そうるノDarkSouls Ⅰ~Ⅲ通し配信 p11 - Duration: 2:02:09. -------------------------------------------
Laugh from your heart with dark souls 3 pvp - Duration: 3:19.
For more infomation >> Laugh from your heart with dark souls 3 pvp - Duration: 3:19. -------------------------------------------
THE OUTSIDER Knižní trailer (2018) CZ TIT | Planet Dark - Duration: 0:16.
Evil can have many faces
maybe even yours
The Outsider
New from Stephen King
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét