Thứ Hai, 18 tháng 9, 2017

Auto news on Youtube Sep 18 2017

'Expect more missile launches' US veteran warns North Korea military action is OFF table

Decorated soldier Lt Col Daniel Davis said he was "concerned" US President will not back down as he warned taking on the rogue nation would have "virtually no chance of success".

He said military options should unequivocally be taken off the table, as the US "cannot wipe out all of their ability to fire weapons of mass destruction fast enough to prevent a counterattack from Pyongyang.

And he urged against any proposals for all-out war with , saying: "That time has passed." Lt Col Davis told CNBC: All you can do is to make him [North Korean leader Kim Jong-un] believe with a military strike that we are coming after him, and now he has incentive to use these weapons.".

The decorated veteran retired from the US Army after 21 years service, and is now a senior fellow and military expert at Defense Priorities.

He warned Pyongyangs objective was to have a reliable ballistic missile capability so it can defend itself from what leaders view as the threat of a US attack.

Lt Col Davis added: "We can expect more missile launches." He also condemned war-mongering talk from the US Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, who said the United Nations Security Council had run out of options on containing North Korea.

Lt Col Davis said: We want to give him no incentive to use the weapons, and thats why deterrence is such a critical thing at this point in time.

"We cant think that sanctions are going to stop him from what hes doing.  "We have to find other levers, and I dont even think were looking for those right now..

His comments come after North Korea launched another missile over Japan into the Pacific Ocean last week, amid tough new UN sanctions on crude oil and textiles.

Lt Col Davis added: Its not as if they decided to launch a test missile after the UN sanctions last Monday.

Whats going on is part of a broader process. They need to launch a good four to five additional missiles over the next 12 months, with three to four months between each one of them, so they can validate the effectiveness of their missile fleet.".

For more infomation >> 'Expect more missile launches' US veteran warns North Korea military action is OFF table - Duration: 3:18.

-------------------------------------------

US warns North Korea will be 'DESTROYED' if 'reckless' threats continue as war fears grow - Duration: 3:55.

US warns North Korea will be 'DESTROYED' if 'reckless' threats continue as war fears grow

Ahead of meetings in New York later this week, Nikki Haley kept up the Trump administration's hardline rhetoric when she told reporters that if poses a serious threat to the US or its allies then it "will be destroyed".

She added that 's earlier statement, when he declared Pyongyang would be met with "fire and fury like the world has never seen" if missile tests continued, was "not an empty threat".

Speaking to CNN, Ms Haley said: None of us want war… We wanted to be responsible and go to all diplomatic means to get their attention first.  "If that doesnt work, General Mattis will take care of it..

President Trump is set to address the UN General Assembly on Tuesday before meeting with South Korean president Moon Jae-in and Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe on Thursday to try to work out a strategy to deal with North Korea.

Trump spoke with his South Korean counterpart on Saturday night and pair agreed to exert "stronger pressure" on Pyongyang.

The White House said Trump and Moon had committed to take steps to strengthen deterrence and defence capabilities of South Korea, offering no details of how it might do so.

Trump tweeted to tell his followers about his call with the South Korean president, adopting a new nickname for Kim Jong-un in the process.

He tweeted: I spoke with President Moon of South Korea last night. Asked him how Rocket Man is doing.

Long gas lines forming in North Korea. Too bad!   The UN Security Council imposed a raft of new sanctions on North Korea last week but they will only be effective if China and Russia fully implement them.

after Kim Jong-un's regime, which used to notify China ahead of weapon tests, did not issue a warning before its nuclear blast earlier this month.  North Korea expert Zhao Tong said many Chinese people "now see North Korea as a major liability". .

He added: And it appears North Korea doesnt mind annoying Beijing. " Defiant North Korea has fired 22 missiles during 15 tests since February, despite international calls for the country to stop its weapon operations.

  A hydrogen bomb was detonated on September 3 in the regime's most powerful nuclear test to date.

And the rogue state's weapon tests have put a strain on China and North Korea - two historical allies.  Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying said on Friday: China is not the focus.

China is not the driving force behind the escalating situation. And China is not the key to resolving the issue..

For more infomation >> US warns North Korea will be 'DESTROYED' if 'reckless' threats continue as war fears grow - Duration: 3:55.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING Mexico Issued A Warning, All Mexicans In U.S. To "Take Precautions" - News - Duration: 2:00.

For more infomation >> BREAKING Mexico Issued A Warning, All Mexicans In U.S. To "Take Precautions" - News - Duration: 2:00.

-------------------------------------------

US, South Korea, Japan Conduct Live Fire Air Drills - Duration: 1:00.

For more infomation >> US, South Korea, Japan Conduct Live Fire Air Drills - Duration: 1:00.

-------------------------------------------

World War 3: US strategy to take on North Korea revealed as Trump readies 'strike group' - Duration: 3:46.

World War 3: US strategy to take on North Korea revealed as Trump readies 'strike group'

It comes after North Korea launched another provocative missile over Japan on Friday amid repeated threats to the US.

The White House will send B-1B strategic bombers, currently stationed in the US territory Guam, to the Korean region later this month ahead of joint military drills with South Korea in October.

A US aircraft carrier strike group will be used during the military training. South Korea and the US will also conduct a combined missile alert drill joined by Japan between late September and early October, according to the ministry.

Earlier South Korea's president Moon Jae-in vowed strong punishment on the North, adding the situation was the most serious and urgent security issue in this region at the current moment".

He added: North Korea should realise that dialogue and cooperation, not nukes and missiles, are the only means to protect its security and guarantee a bright future." Moon had spoken Donald Trump earlier in a telephone call, where the pair agreed to exert stronger sanctions on the hermit kingdom following its nuclear and missile tests this week.

Park Soo-hyun, the spokesman for South Korea's Blue House, said: "The two leaders agreed to strengthen cooperation, and exert stronger and practical sanctions on North Korea so that it realises provocative actions leads to further diplomatic isolation and economic pressure.".

The Blue House said Mr Moon and Mr Trump had strongly condemned the latest missile launch by North Korea, and agreed the two nations would work with the international community to implement the latest UN Security Councils resolution 2375.

Mr Park did not reveal exactly what further sanctions would be placed on the North, but if they stopped oil imports from China they would be the strongest yet.

The two leaders' phone call came after North Korea fired an unidentified missile early on Friday from the Sunan district in its capital, Pyongyang, over Japan.

North Korea's state-run news agency, KCNA, yesterday released photos it claimed were of the latest missile test.

A series of pictures showed a ballistic missile at different stages of the launch while another showed dictator Kim Jong-un laughing and clapping his hands as several officials around him did the same while apparently watching the launch.

The despotic leader said his country's "final goal" was "to establish the equilibrium of real force with the US and make the US rulers dare not talk about military option".

For more infomation >> World War 3: US strategy to take on North Korea revealed as Trump readies 'strike group' - Duration: 3:46.

-------------------------------------------

WILODIA Can you leave this place with me [Living in United States] - Duration: 4:53.

Hello, Are you there?

I never thought I'd see you come back here

Although I've long forgotten your name

Familiar feelings they are not in vain

These feelings bound me to the walls

Slowly watching me dissolve

Like shadows fading to the glowing city lights

These neon streets are all I've known

This emptiness is not alone

Like shadows fading to the glowing city lights

Can you leave this place with me?

Become a fleeting memory

And the years will cease to be

So can you leave this place with me?

Can you leave this place with me?

Become a fleeting memory

And the years will cease to be

Can you leave this place with me?

Can you leave this place with me?

Can you leave this place with me?

We'll fade and be forgotten Like ashes washed away

Washed away...

Washed away...

Can you leave this place with me?

Become a fleeting

memory

And the years will cease to be

So can you leave this place

with me

Can you leave this place

with me?

Become a fleeting memory

And the years will cease to be

Can you leave this place with me?

Can you leave this place with ...

Can you leave this place with me?

THANK YOU Wilodia FANS & SHIPPERS for WATCHING

SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE FUN

For more infomation >> WILODIA Can you leave this place with me [Living in United States] - Duration: 4:53.

-------------------------------------------

High-Level Event on "Reforming the United Nations: Management, Security, and Development" - Duration: 13:22.

AMBASSADOR HALEY: Good morning, and welcome to everyone.

Thank you, and welcome to an event that shows it truly is a new day at the United Nations.

I thank you very much for being here.

You should know that we had to get a bigger room to accommodate everyone here today, and

that's a good problem.

And that is one of the greatest signs of hope for the United Nations that we've seen since

I've been here.

The Declaration of Support for United Nations Reform began as a way to give momentum to

Secretary-General Guterres' efforts to bring greater efficiency, accountability, and transparency

to the UN.

We thought that having Member States put their names on a document would help ensure that

these goals don't remain just words but become a part of the culture of the UN.

The response that we've had has been nothing short of fantastic; 128 nations have signed

onto the declaration as of this morning, and we're still counting.

That is a supermajority.

I thank our co-hosts today, our friends from Canada, Germany, Indonesia, Japan, Jordan,

Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Slovakia, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and Uruguay.

Most of all, I thank all of you.

The fact that so many are committed to seeing the United Nations succeed is gratifying.

It is a sign, not only that change is desperately needed, but that it will be achieved.

You are the reason change is coming to the UN.

It is now my honor to introduce someone who is no stranger to change.

Donald Trump has a businessman's eye for seeing potential, and he sees great potential,

not just in this reform movement, but in the United Nations itself.

He shares your commitment to creating a more effective advocate for peace, security,

and human rights.

We are deeply grateful he has taken the time to be with us today.

Ladies and gentlemen, President Donald J. Trump.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, thank you very much.

Thank you.

(Applause.)

I actually saw great potential right across the street, to be honest with you,

and it was only for the reason that the United Nations was here that

that turned out to be such a successful project.

So I want to thank you, Ambassador Haley,

for your introduction and for your steadfast advocacy for American interests

on the world stage.

On behalf of the co-host countries, I would like to also thank Secretary General Guterres for --

and you have been fantastic -- for joining us, and we affirm our commitment

to the United Nations reform.

And reform is what we're talking about.

I applaud the Secretary General for laying out a vision to reform the United Nations

so that it better serves the people we all represent.

We support your efforts to look across the entire system and to find ways

the United Nations can better, and be better at development, management, peace, and security.

The United Nations was founded on truly noble goals.

These include affirming the dignity and worth of the human person and striving

for international peace.

The United Nations has helped advance toward these goals in so many ways:

feeding the hungry, providing disaster relief, and empowering women and girls

in many societies all across the world.

Yet in recent years, the United Nations has not reached its full potential

because of bureaucracy and mismanagement.

While the United Nations on a regular budget has increased by 140 percent, and its staff

has more than doubled since 2000, we are not seeing the results in line with this investment.

But I know that under the Secretary General, that's changing and it's changing fast.

And we've seen it.

That's why we commend the Secretary General and his call for the United Nations

to focus more on people and less on bureaucracy.

We seek a United Nations that regains the trust of the people around the world.

In order to achieve this, the United Nations must hold every level of management accountable,

protect whistle-blowers and focus on results rather than on process.

To honor the people of our nations, we must ensure that no one and no member state shoulders

a disproportionate share of the burden, and that's militarily or financially.

We also ask that every peacekeeping mission have clearly defined goals and metrics

for evaluating success.

They deserve to see the value in the United Nations, and it is our job to show it to them.

We encourage the Secretary General to fully use his authority to cut through the bureaucracy,

reform outdated systems, and make firm decisions to advance the U.N.'s core mission.

Further, we encourage all member states to look at ways to take bold stands at the

United Nations with an eye toward changing business as usual and not being beholden

to ways of the past which were not working.

Mr. Secretary General, the United States and the member states present today

support this great reform vision.

We pledge to be partners in your work, and I am confident that if we work together and

champion truly bold reforms, the United Nations will emerge as a stronger, more effective,

more just, and greater force for peace and harmony in the world.

Thank you, Mr. Secretary General.

And I look forward to advancing these shared goals in the years to come,

and it is a great honor to be with you today.

Thank you.

(Applause.)

AMBASSADOR HALEY: I came to the United Nations about the same time as the Secretary-General.

He and I share a mission to find value in the UN.

We share the goal of a better United Nations.

Not a cheaper UN or a more expensive UN.

Not a smaller one or a bigger one.

A better United Nations.

An organization with the trust and the capability to deliver on its mandate to promote peace,

security and human rights.

over the past eight months, he has been a partner and become a friend.

His leadership brings us together today.

Ladies and gentlemen, Secretary-General Antonio Guterres.

(Applause)

SECRETARY-GENERAL GUTERRES: Mr. President, thank you very much for your engagement

and your support.

I also thank Ambassador Haley for her leadership, her partnership and her commitment.

And I am very grateful to all the leaders here today.

Someone recently asked what keeps me up at night.

My answer was simple:  bureaucracy.

Fragmented structures.

Byzantine procedures.

Endless red tape.

Someone out to undermine the UN could not have come up with a better way to do it than

by imposing some of the rules we have created ourselves.

I even sometimes ask myself whether there was a conspiracy to make our rules exactly

what they need to be for us not to be effective.

Above all, let us never forget that we are here to serve.

To serve the people.

People suffering in poverty or exclusion …

people victimized by conflict …

people whose rights and dignity are being denied …

but also people with ideas and dreams who need a helping hand.

Reform is for them.

Reform is for the hardworking taxpayers who underwrite all the crucial work we do.

And reform is for everyone serving under the UN flag, all of whom deserve

the conditions to do their vital job.

To serve the people we support and the people who support us,

we must be nimble and effective, flexible and efficient.

And we must do so keenly aware of our obligation to live up to the values

of the United Nations Charter.

Together, we are making progress on a broad and bold reform agenda

to strengthen the United Nations.

We have launched a game-changing strategy to end sexual exploitation and abuse.

We have embarked on plans to achieve gender parity in the UN;

protect whistle-blowers; and strengthen counter-terrorism structures.

We are reforming our peace and security architecture – to ensure we are stronger in prevention,

more agile in mediation, and more effective and cost-effective in peacekeeping operations.

We are reforming our development system to become much more field-focused, well-coordinated

and accountable to better assist countries through the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

– our contribution to a fair globalization.

And to underpin all these efforts we are pursuing sweeping management reform –

to simplify procedures and decentralize decisions,

with greater transparency, efficiency and accountability.

These efforts reinforce each other – and they are all grounded in overarching principles.

We are a global organization.

Ninety per cent of our personnel serve in the field.

We need to bring decision-making closer to the people we serve; trust and empower managers;

reform cumbersome and costly budgetary procedures; and eliminate duplicative structures.

Mr. President, you often have said, and you repeat it today,

that the UN has tremendous potential.

All of us have a responsibility to make sure we live up to it.

Our shared objective is a 21st century UN focused more on people and less on process,

and as you rightly said, more on delivery and less on bureaucracy.

We know that the true test of reform will not be measured in words in New York

or world capitals.

It will be measured through tangible results in the lives of the people we serve –

and the trust of those who support our work through their hard-earned resources.

Value for money while advancing shared values – that is our common goal.

I thank you very much for your support for these vital efforts.

Mr. President, many thanks.

(Applause)

AMBASSADOR HALEY: Thank you, Mr. President and Mr. Secretary-General.

Today is a great day, but it's the beginning of a process, not the end.

There are 193 members of the United Nations.

That means there are about 70 Member States out there that have not yet signed

the Declaration of Support for United Nations Reform.

Our mission leaving here today is to not be satisfied with less than a complete consensus

on this reform agenda.

We are always stronger when we speak with one voice, and the future of this institution

is worth the extra mile.

Our goal is to convince the delegations that have not yet signed the declaration

to join the effort for a more efficient, accountable, and transparent UN.

The United States believes we can make history by coming together as a true global community

for reform.

In the coming weeks and months, we will be considering

the Secretary-General's broader vision.

This is an opportunity for all of us to seize this moment and ensure

that the United Nations remains relevant.

We must challenge traditional mindsets, inertia, and resistance to change.

We will do this together.

I hope we can count on your help.

Thank you again, and let's make it a new day at the United Nations.

For more infomation >> High-Level Event on "Reforming the United Nations: Management, Security, and Development" - Duration: 13:22.

-------------------------------------------

Iran warns US about scrapping nuclear deal (Amanpour exclusive) - Duration: 8:52.

mr. president welcome back to the program tell you much I kill him thank

you very much good to see you things seem quite different than they

did last year in the year before what will happen do you think if President

Trump pulls the United States out of the nuclear deal jcpoa jcpoa a multilateral

agreement ratified by the United Nations Security Council exiting such an

agreement would have very high cost for the United States of America and I do

not believe that Americans would be willing to pay such a high cost for

something that will be useless for them it will yield no results for the United

States but at the same time it will generally decrease and cut away and chip

away at international trust placed in the United States of America what would

you do what would Iran do options at our disposal visibly this issue if the

United States pulls out of the jcpoa

there has been a great deal of thought given to this possible scenario

regarding our reaction and if such a thing were to happen quite swiftly the

world will see Iran's steps and reactions this action will take place in

a matter of a few days however given that mr. Drumm reactions and actions and

policies are somewhat unpredictable we have had long thought and discussions

about our reactions can I ask you because I've talked to other Iranian

government officials I've spoken to officials from around the world what do

you think of President Trump's Twitter diplomacy do you see a strategy do you

see policy do see chaos what what do you see do you

well in any way it is a method that Mister footage trump has started he

knows better than anyone he wishes perhaps to enter into certain

announcements actively and the head of the media I don't see it as a problem

specifically however what he reads at certain points doesn't seem to be in

accordance and in line with other statements from other American officials

and this by its nature causes a certain deal of chaos you see what's happening

between Burma Myanmar and Bangladesh Rakhine State the RO hinder minority the

Moslems being being thrown out of Myanmar

what is Iran's position on this and how dangerous is it in terms of it being yet

another cause yet another Muslim cause for the terrorists to use as an excuse

to create more terrorism around the world you read kam Sagara recent

developments are fairly unprecedented under which 400,000 people have been run

from their home and their house is set oblate by the Myanmar security forces so

it is a human tragedy and it is a genocide that is taking place and I

believe that not only Muslims but all countries from throughout the world must

visa vide the Myanmar government and then Myanmar Armed Forces stand

steadfast against their current actions and render great deal of support and aid

to the refugees currently entering Bangladesh is it a magnet to recruit

terrorists hami chingu naked Ahmad these actions oppression against people

running them from their homes genocides always lay the grounds for extremism and

violence and it is possible for terrorists to wish to use such an

atmosphere and such a foundation but it is up to us to

not allow them to use these four to use these as tools to draw people as a

magnet and certainly once their defeat is ultimately achieved and driven from

seed the Syrian and Iraqi battlefield they would certainly focus elsewhere and

it is of great danger not only for us but the rest of the world as well as

Europe of course what is your reaction to the leader of North Korea Kim jong-un

with his sixth nuclear test with his ICBM missile test with sending missiles

over Japan threatening American territory what is your reaction to

what's happening there right now and he has nuclear weapons

Massimo Phoolan Raja Basilicata our position has been very clear and remains

clear visa vie nuclear weapons we are against any type of weapons of mass

destruction as well as nuclear weapons and we believe that they must be

destroyed throughout the world so our opinion our positions are clear

arms races are not acceptable to us in any region and we see that as extremely

dangerous however from the other side the positions and the actions of the

United States as well as other nations against the North Korean countries has

not been very positive and I don't think there is a military solution to this

only diplomacy is the tool that will resolve this problem permanently a

security adviser to the president of South Korea told me that if the Obama

administration had spent one fifth of the time it spent with you and Iran on

North Korea's nuclear program it may have had some success

it hasn't spent any time very little time has been spent trying to make a

deal with North Korea all over our whole creation anyways North Korea was on

tract of talks and dialogue and those roads were blocked and both sides chose

non dialogue actions and I think what the Iranian experience shows is a good

experience that can be replicated elsewhere and executed elsewhere but

keep in mind please that if the United States wishes to withdraw from the Joye

jcpoa why would the North Koreans waste their time in order to sit around the

table of dialogue with the United States because they will think that perhaps

after years of talks and a potential agreement the next US administration

could step over a pool out of the agreement achieved so the Trump

administration such action or such potential action but the Trump

administration will block such potential roads to success in resolution of

regional problems around the world President Trump will make his first

address to the United Nations tomorrow on on Tuesday

he's expected to talk a lot about Iran as well as North Korea and other issues

but a lot about Iran what do you expect to hear and if you were to meet

President Trump what would you say to him we can talk the way in which

currently in which does for the US administration has chosen to stand

against Iran and the jcpoa has been the wrong one and the proof has been

experienced by previous administrations in the United States and the conclusion

is natural to reach that what the Obama administration is in order to achieve

success in this engagement visa vita jcpoa and iran drew upon the

unsuccessful unsuccessful experiences of previous administrations however the

path undertaken today by this US administration is a return to the past

to a distant past that goes all the way back to President Bush number one as

well as President Bush the son number two

so these have already been traveled upon they

have been unsuccessful and soon that mr. Trump will see that this was the wrong

path that he had chosen on that note mr. president thank you very much indeed for

joining us man how much richer I'm also thankful grateful for being here thank

you

For more infomation >> Iran warns US about scrapping nuclear deal (Amanpour exclusive) - Duration: 8:52.

-------------------------------------------

US - Sean Spicer's surprise cameo at Emmy Ceremony sets social media ablaze - Duration: 1:47.

He wasn't there but Donald Trump still took center stage at this year's Emmy.

The ceremony took almost non-stop aim at the US president.

"And we all know the Emmys mean a lot to Donald Trump because he was nominated

multiple times for "Celebrity Apprentice", but he never won...

Why didn't you give him an Emmy?

I tell you this if he had won an Emmy I bet he wouldn't have run for president..."

The choice of awards also had a strong political flavor.

The Best Drama Prize went to "The Handmaid's Tale",

an adaptation of Margaret Atwood's novel about the future dystopian America.

Hulu became the first streaming sites to win an Emmy for best drama.

"Veep" a deeply cynical Washington sitcom won the best comedy series

Julia Louis-Dreyfus picked up her sixth Emmy Award for her portrayal of a clueless president

"We did have a whole storyline about an impeachment ,

but we abandoned that because we were worried that someone else might get to it first!"

And Saturday Night won the most Emmys overall,

with Alec Baldwin who impersonates Trump winning Best Supporting Actor.

"I suppose I should say "at long last mr. president here is Emmy!"

Perhaps the biggest surprise was a cameo by Sean Spicer.

The former White House, press secretary notorious

for exaggerating the size of Trump's inauguration crowd.

"This would be the largest audience

to witness an Emmys, period!'

Spicer's controversial appearance set social media ablaze,

with many questioning whether he should have been there at all

and saying the joke simply wasn't funny...

For more infomation >> US - Sean Spicer's surprise cameo at Emmy Ceremony sets social media ablaze - Duration: 1:47.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump calls for reforms at the United Nations (Full remarks) - Duration: 6:11.

the declaration of support for United Nations reform began as a way to give

momentum to secretary-general Guterres efforts to bring greater efficiency

accountability and transparency to the UN we thought that having member states

put their names on a document would help ensure that these goals don't remain

just words but become a part of the culture of the UN the response that

we've had has been nothing short of fantastic 128 nations have signed on to

the declaration as of this morning and we're still counting that is a

supermajority I thank our co-hosts today our friends from Canada Germany

Indonesia Japan Jordan Nigeria Wanda Senegal Slovakia Thailand the United

Kingdom and Uruguay most of all I thank all of you the fact that so many are

committed to sing the United Nations succeed is gratifying it is a sign not

only that change is desperately needed but that it will be achieved you were

the reason change is coming to the UN it is now my honor to introduce someone who

is no stranger to change Donald Trump has a business man's eye for seeing

potential and he sees great potential not just in this reform movement but in

the United Nations itself he shares your commitment to creating a more effective

advocate for peace security and human rights we are deeply grateful he has

taken the time to be with us today ladies and gentlemen president Donald J

Trump well thank you very much thank you I actually saw a great potential right

across the street to be honest with you and it was only for the reason that the

United Nations was here that that turned out to be such a successful project so I

want to thank you ambassador Haley for your introduction and for your steadfast

advocacy for American interests on the world stage on behalf of the co-host

countries I would like to also thank secretary-general GU turis for and you

have been fantastic for joining us and we affirm our commitment to the United

Nations reform and reform is what we're talking about I applaud the

secretary-general for laying out a vision to reform the United Nations so

that it better serves the people we all represent we support your efforts to

look across the entire system and to find ways the United Nations can better

and be better at development management peace and security the United Nations

was founded on truly noble goals these include affirming the dignity and

worth of the human person and striving for international peace the United

Nations has helped advance toward these goals in so many ways feeding the hungry

providing disaster relief and empowering women and girls and many societies all

across the world yet in recent years the United Nations has not reached its full

potential because of bureaucracy and mismanagement while the United Nations

on a regular budget has increased by 140 percent and its staff has more than

doubled since 2000 we are not seeing the results in line with this investment but

I know that under the secretary-general that's changing and it's changing fast

and we've seen it that's why we commend the secretary-general and is call for

the United Nations to focus more on people

and less on bureaucracy we seek a United Nations that regains the trust of the

people around the world in order to achieve this the United Nations must

hold every level of management accountable protect whistleblowers and

focus on results rather than on process to honor the people of our nations we

must ensure that no one and no member state shoulders

a disproportionate share of the burden and that's militarily or financially we

also ask that every peacekeeping mission have clearly defined goals and metrics

for evaluating success they deserve to see the value in the United Nations and

it is our job to show it to them we encourage the secretary-general to fully

use his authority to cut through the bureaucracy reform outdated systems and

make firm decisions to advance the UN's core mission further we encourage all

Member States to look at ways to take bold stands at the United Nations with

an eye toward changing business as usual and not being beholden to ways of the

past which were not working mr. secretary-general the United States and

the member states present today support this great reform vision we pledge to be

partners in your work and I am confident that if we work together and champion

truly bold reforms the United Nations will emerge as a stronger more effective

more just in greater force for peace and harmony in the world Thank You mr.

secretary-general and I look forward to advancing the shared goals in the years

to come and it is a great honor to be with you today thank you

For more infomation >> President Trump calls for reforms at the United Nations (Full remarks) - Duration: 6:11.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. sends warnings to North Korea ahead of UN General Assembly - Duration: 1:48.

Top U.S. officials are warning North Korea... a military strike will soon be the only option

left on the table.

Going one step further, Washington clarified there are plenty of ways to hit the regime

where it hurts should it all boils down to such measures.

Kim Hyo-sun shares with us their remarks.

U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has stressed that a military response will be

the only option left to deal with North Korea's nuclear issue once diplomatic efforts fail.

During an interview with CBS on Sunday,... Tillerson said the Trump administration's

strategy on Pyongyang involves a (quote) "peaceful pressure campaign,"... which is aimed at bringing

the regime back to the table for constructive and productive dialogue.

Also on Sunday,... the U.S. Ambassador to the UN warned the North that there are a lot

of military options on the table.

Nikki Haley told CNN that the UN Security Council has run out of options to rein in

North Korea.

Her comments,... ahead of the annual UN General Assembly, indicate that Washington will not

back down from its military option,... especially as the regime conducted yet another ballistic

missile test on Friday.

U.S. National Security Advisor,... H.R. McMaster,... also warned the Kim Jong-un regime to give

up its nuclear weapons as President Trump will not tolerate nuclear threats to the U.S.

homeland.

Speaking with ABC on Sunday,...McMaster highlighted that Washington will find a fundamentally

different approach to deal with the North as past sanctions have clearly failed.

He also told Fox News that Washington needs to move fast as Pyongyang continues to conduct

nuclear and missile tests.

McMaster stressed that a sense of urgency is key whether through sanctions, diplomacy

or even military options.

Kim Hyo-sun, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> U.S. sends warnings to North Korea ahead of UN General Assembly - Duration: 1:48.

-------------------------------------------

Breaking News: US May Close Havana Embassy - Duration: 1:57.

For more infomation >> Breaking News: US May Close Havana Embassy - Duration: 1:57.

-------------------------------------------

Coast Guard interdicts lancha crew illegally fishing in U.S. - Duration: 0:17.

For more infomation >> Coast Guard interdicts lancha crew illegally fishing in U.S. - Duration: 0:17.

-------------------------------------------

DEFENSE UPDATE - WHY US AND JAPAN DID NOT SHOOT DOWN NORTH KOREA MISSILE? - Duration: 12:28.

AS fears rise over North Korea triggering World War 3, questions have been raised over

whether the US could really shoot down one of the regime's missiles?

Another North Korean missile streaked over the island nation's skies.

As startled citizens streamed into bunkers and shelters, Japan's government went to

great lengths to inform, and reassure the public that it was doing everything possible

to protect them.

Truth is, there is very little the Japanese military can do.

The launch was detected at 6.59am Japanese Standard Time.

At 7.06am, the ballistic missile overflew the heavily populated island of Hokkaido.

It was in Japanese air space for less than two minutes, before it fell into the ocean

some 2000km to the east at 7.16am.

Early reports indicate, it was in the air for a total of just 17 minutes, during which

it reached an altitude of 770km and flew a total of 3700km.

This is characteristic of the nuclear-capable HS-12 intermediate range ballistic missile.

So why did Japan's much-hyped interceptor missiles not attempt to take it down?

They probably can't.

In this video, Defense Update looks into 5 conclusive reasons, WHY US and Japan DID NOT

SHOOT DOWN THIS MISSILE FLYING OVER JAPAN?

So, lets get started.

The North Korean missile was detected within seconds of its launch.

US early warning satellites have been keeping a close watch on North Korea for some time

now.

And there's an extensive network of radars in South Korea, the Sea of Japan, and Japan

itself on standby for just such an event.

It would have taken just minutes to activate Japan's automatic public alert system, with

messages flashing up on mobile phones, and recorded voices blaring over radios and televisions.

Every movement of the missile would have been precisely tracked.

Computers would have been rapidly number-crunching to anticipate its exact flight path.

But no interceptor was fired.

This is despite Japan having placed a picket of advanced Aegis radar missile destroyers,

in the Sea of Japan for just that purpose.

And highly visible batteries of Patriot Advanced Capability anti-air missiles, have been deployed

to major residential and military centres.

It was also suggested Japan and the United States, were deliberately holding fire to

watch and learn North Korea's missile capabilities.

But there are persistent doubts, their defence technology is up to the task anyway.

The ballistic missile was flying very fast, and very high.

Reaction times would have needed to be lightning fast.

There was no time for political decisions.

There was no time for consultations with allies.

There was barely enough time to pull the trigger.

In essence, what needed to be done was to shoot down a bullet with another bullet.

But the speed and rapidly-gaining height of the HS-12, would likely have placed it beyond

the reach of the Standard Missile 3 interceptors, aboard Japanese and US destroyers.

It would likely have been too fast, and too high for the Patriot PAC3 missiles at Hokkaido's

Chitose Air Base.

And the public fallout of shooting and missing, would likely be far worse than just another

North Korean missile over flight.

The credibility of US and Japanese defence forces, would suffer severe damage.

If they had tried to bring it down and failed, then the consequences would have been serious.

But even if North Korea's missile had been flying within the supposed parameters enabling

intercept, history shows any attempt would likely have ended in failure.

And the US Pentagon knows it.

The Patriot and Standard interceptor missiles, currently stationed in and around Japan are

advanced.

But they're not the latest technology.

New SM-3 Block IIA Standard missiles, are being deployed by the United States.

These are supposed to fly higher, faster; and with greater accuracy.

But they have also failed several tests.

This is not uncommon for missile interceptors.

Generally tests are conducted under optimal conditions.

Launch times, directions and trajectories are often known in advance.

Yet, disturbingly frequently, the test still fail.

Real-world operational conditions will likely reduce their success rate even further.

A new version of the Standard Missile, the SM-6, was test fired from a destroyer on August

30, successfully downing a medium range ballistic missile in its final seconds of flight in

its first attempt.

Then there's highly-publicised successor to the Patriot air defence system, the Terminal

High Altitude Area Defence system in short THAAD.

This has been hyped, as having a "perfect record on launches" with a claimed track

record of 14 kills out of 14 targets so far.

It has also been deployed to Guam and South Korea.

But even this has not been extensively tested against ballistic missiles.

One timely test, however, did prove promising.

In July a THAAD system in Alaska successfully downed a mid-range projectile.

But it is only able to intercept intermediate (such as the HS-12) and short range missiles.

The bad news is, in August, North Korea successfully tested its first intercontinental ballistic

missile.

This appears to be outside THAAD's scope.

In August, Pyongyang declared it was seriously examining the plan for an enveloping strike

at Guam, through simultaneous fire of four Hwasong-12s.

These missiles would cross the sky above Shimane, Hiroshima, and Koichi Prefectures of Japan,

before flying the 2350km, in 18 minutes necessary to reach the US territory of Guam.

Such an open act of aggression puts the US in a challenging position.

Should it shoot back, or not?

By the time, the North Korean missiles true target is known, they may likely already be

outside of intercept launch range from South Korea, and Japan.

And the recent loss of two advanced US destroyers capable of launching interceptor missiles,

to collisions makes matters worse.

So Guam, will need to defend itself with antimissile batteries there.

Even if one missile is successfully intercepted, the odds of going four-for-four with North

Korea's Hwasong-12 salvo over the Sea of Japan, using SM-3s are likely to be vanishingly

low.

North Korea missile analyst Ankit Panda recently wrote.

If Kim Jong-un, orders a salvo test, and the US, and Japan attempt interception but fail

to make contact with all four missiles, US defence assurances and credibility take a

hit.

"In any scenario, where a ballistic missile is allowed to overfly Japan into the Pacific,

this remains true."

In the end, Panda says, the prospect of successful interception of one IRBM, would come down

to a great number of variables, having to fall in favour of the United States and Japan.

So alternative options will have to be explored.

In the face of Kim Jong-un's increasingly inflammatory rhetoric, and nuclear-capable

missiles flying over its territory,

Japan's President Shinzo Abe is faced with a terrible decision.

Should he rely on unproven, unreliable interceptor missiles to protect his people?

Or should he consider something much more extreme?

In recent months, the Japanese government has been debating the need to modify its pacifist

constitution, to allow a pre-emptive strike capability.

It's already been quietly building up just such an ability, such as the acquisition of

the stealthy F-35 strike fighter.

But more blatant moves, such as the acquisition of its own ballistic and cruise missiles,

will need a constitutional shift.

And this is looking increasingly, likely in the face of the limitations of antimissile

systems.

While the US and Japan, have conducted ballistic missile defense exercises, and both have Aegis-equipped

ships capable of shooting down some ballistic missiles, it would be extremely difficult

for the US or Japan, to intercept a North Korean intermediate or intercontinental ballistic

missile, in flight over Japan toward a target such as Guam.

The Aegis system is capable of intercepting shorter-range missiles in mid-course with

the SM-3 missile, and it also provides, "terminal phase", defense with the SM-2 missile closer

to the ballistic missile's target.

But it's uncertain, whether either system would be successful against a "pop up" attack

with an ICBM.

The SM-3 Block IIA, has an operational range of about 1350 miles.

But range isn't the issue, as much as the speed required to intercept.

If a North Korean missile were fired to an altitude of over 500 kilometers, success in

a shoot-down, would depend greatly on how quickly the missile was tracked, and the timing

of an interceptor launch.

Based on the time and distance envelopes for SM-2 and SM-3 missile intercepts, an Aegis

defender would only have a few minutes to get off a shot at an ICBM launch from North

Korea.

Aegis-equipped destroyers, and cruisers would have to be dangerously close to the North

Korean coast, to get a chance to strike an ICBM, in "boost" phase as it rose, and could

be vulnerable to North Korean submarines, if an actual attack were planned.

If a missile launched by North Korea, was deemed not to be a threat to Japan, or the

US, or South Korea, the best choice available to the US, and allies would be to simply observe

the launch, and collect data.

Missing a shot at a missile just passing over Japan, could have far-reaching political implications,

as it would suggest that anti-ballistic missile systems are incapable of protecting people

in South Korea, Japan, or Guam.

And if a shot hit the missile, it could further provoke North Korea into much more dangerous

actions.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét