Chủ Nhật, 23 tháng 9, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Sep 23 2018

The trade war between the United States and China, now in its seventh month, has dealt

a blow to South Korean stocks.

The country's main index, the KOSPI, lost nearly 7 percent of its value from late March

until last Friday.

Among markets of the G20 countries, it ranked 16th in terms of performance.

Korean companies rely heavily on trade with both China and the U.S., so it was inevitable

that they would be affected by the tit-for-tat tariffs between them.

Foreigners sold shares worth more than 3 billion dollars.

Of those, more than 1-point-4 billion were shares of market leader Samsung Electronics...

whose price as a result fell almost 8-and-a-half percent.

For more infomation >> S. Korea's main stock index down 6.91% since March on U.S.-China trade war - Duration: 0:41.

-------------------------------------------

Montana State defeats Portland State to open Big Sky - Duration: 1:33.

For more infomation >> Montana State defeats Portland State to open Big Sky - Duration: 1:33.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING NEWS: President Rouhani: " Iran ready to confront US " - Duration: 4:28.

For more infomation >> BREAKING NEWS: President Rouhani: " Iran ready to confront US " - Duration: 4:28.

-------------------------------------------

Vasuu Coffee || US Telugu Short Film || Romantic Thriller || 2018 - Duration: 15:12.

Vasuu..

Coffee..!

Vasuu ..? (distantly calling)

Yes, in a minute

Hello..

Hello Jay.. Where are you?

Yeah, Hi.. I am out. What's up?

Ooh, okay. so, busy with your birthday plans?

No, nothing like that.

Okay, its fine but make sure you show up to the meetings atleast.

boss was upset that your module is not done

Yeah yeah sorry. I was actually a little busy.

why?.. Anything I can help with?

No, no, its fine. i can deal with this.

Okay, I just wanted to tell you about the work, and tried calling you yesterday too.

Ooh, Thanks. I will handle it tomorrow.

Okay. Happy Birthday once again. See you tomorrow then.

okay sure bye.

I traveled home just to convince my parents about us, so give me sometime.

Sir

Thank you

Jay! Dad was just beside me.

Didn't I tell you not to call me until I return from India.

I am trying Jay, but its not that easy.

Its hard enough to handle this new match my parents got me.

I will be back in 2 days right? this can wait till then.

No, don't come. My uncle is going to be there.

Come to our coffee place by 5.

Sir, your coffee.

You speak Telugu? I am actually waiting for a friend. So..

Can you get up?

Are you deaf?

Whats this?

What is this now?

Vasuu..?

What is this about?

You know her?

But how do you...

Vasu: Jay! where are you?

Jay: Vasuu..

Vasu: Don't you check your messages?

Jay: Where are you?

Vasu: I am waiting in the coffee shop.

Jay: At the coffee shop?

Vasu: Hey! who are you guys.. (agitated)

Jay: Vasuu.. whats happening?

Vasu: leave me.. Jay!!

Jay: vasuu...?

Vasu: Jay!!! (phone disconnects)

(Distant noises)

Stop! (in vasuu's voice) Vasuu..? (Jay thinking)

I told my parents about me and Jay. They agreed.

Did you tell him?

No, I wanted to give him a surprise. He doesn't even know I am back to Dallas yet.

You start navigating.

Okay, so, do you have a plan for it?

Yeah, but I need someone that Jay doesn't know of.

You guys don't know him right?

Vasuu: hey, how is the surprise?

Jay: so, where is my gift?

Vasuu: what do you want?

Jay: You know what i want (naughty smilie)

Vasuu: I can't give it right now

Jay: But i want it now!

Jay: Just come out here,.. I will take it myself (cunning smilie)

Vasuu: No

Jay: Will you come out by yourself or shall I call you out?

Vasuu: Wait NO.. I will kill you.

Jay: Your wish. I am not going to let go

Vasuu: Are you mad? there are so many around us

Jay: I don't care.

Vasuu: No ... please don't..

For more infomation >> Vasuu Coffee || US Telugu Short Film || Romantic Thriller || 2018 - Duration: 15:12.

-------------------------------------------

What Happens If The U.S. Outlaws Abortion? | AJ+ - Duration: 9:48.

"Good evening. In a landmark ruling,

the Supreme Court today legalized abortions."

That was then.

"And I think that January 22, 1973, will be a historic day."

This is now.

"Hhheeeeyyyyy, save a baby. Oh, oh, oh, oh, stop abortion now."

The Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision wasn't the end of the fight over abortion rights in the United States.

It was just a bell signaling another round in a lengthy match.

"This fight that we have, we don't have to be having it the way that we're having it.

It doesn't make much sense."

Proponents on both sides of abortion accessibility have pounced out of their corners

and are ready to box it out over the future of this issue.

Now that President Trump has nominated this man for the high court, even more eyes are fixed on Roe v. Wade.

"This Supreme Court nominee, Judge Kavanaugh, is going to destroy women's reproductive freedom."

"Shut it down so Trump don't get it! Shut it down so Trump don't get it!"

"If it were to be overturned, I think it would happen in a very slow way. I don't think

there'd be a big headline one day in the paper. I think, rather, over a series of rulings over the

course of many years, we wake up one day and discover,

'Heck, you know, Roe v. Wade was more or less overturned.'"

Hey, fam. I'm Imaeyen, and I'd love for you to hit that subscribe button right now,

because we're about to explain what the U.S. would look like in a post–Roe v. Wade world.

And it turns out, we may already have the blueprint to that future.

This is what the United States looked like in the 1970s.

The Vietnam War had generations in conflict.

President Richard Nixon won reelection, and just one year later

Watergate had already begun to consume his presidency.

"Let me remind you that the finest steel has to go through the hottest fire,

and I can assure you, my friends, that this room is full of fine steel tonight."

And when the 1970s began, women still weren't allowed to have credit cards.

This was the nation's backdrop when the Supreme Court's historic Roe v. Wade decision legalized abortion.

But the minute it was revealed, it was contested by anti-abortion advocates.

"In this instance, the Supreme Court has withdrawn protection for the rights of unborn children,

and it is teaching people that abortion is a rather innocuous procedure."

The decision has been on the books now for 45 years,

and today's stats show one in four women in the U.S. will have an abortion by age 45.

But erasing Roe v. Wade isn't the way some anti-abortion advocates view success.

Instead, activists like Eric Scheidler believe throttling it is the best way to neuter it. He

says people who oppose abortion access should focus on chipping away at the

precedent by finding ways to restrict the procedure.

"I think the chances of Roe v. Wade being reversed anytime soon are very low.

It would take just the right sort of case and just the right sort of cultural moment.

I think we're far more likely to see the Supreme Court allow further restrictions on abortion."

Scheidler says cases like 1992's

already have done that and he believes they've been more impactful than Roe.

In Casey, the Supreme Court ruled that states could regulate abortion to protect

the health of the mother and the life of the fetus.

It affirmed most of Pennsylvania's 1982 Abortion Control Act,

which required a 24-hour waiting period before a procedure and that women be given "informed consent."

And the pursuit for restrictions didn't end there.

If Roe ended right now 22 states are likely to end abortion

thanks in part to trigger laws. Those are laws some states have passed

that say the procedure is immediately outlawed in the even Roe is overturned.

The states most likely to eliminate access are concentrated in the south and midwest.

Even right now there are cases working there way up the system to help restrict Roe's precedent.

"There are any number of measures that the Supreme Court has allowed over the years to restrict abortion and

regulate abortion in some way or another. And the standard that they're using now isn't the sort of

arte blanche of abortion on demand that we saw in Roe v. Wade."

Scheidler admits that even if Roe were reversed immediately, it wouldn't mean

the end of abortion access in the U.S.

The choice would just revert back to the states. That's where you'd see the difference.

Today, 42 states require licensed doctors to perform abortions.

And that Pennsylvania law I mentioned earlier – in total, 27 states require a woman to wait a specified amount of

time between when she receives counseling and when the procedure occurs.

Author and attorney Michelle Oberman says these differences impact women differently

depending on their financial status.

"The correlation between abortion and economics is crystal-clear. Women have abortions when they feel

that they cannot afford to have another child, or to have a child, and we see that playing out

when we look at the statistics of who has abortions in this country.

The poorest 13% of women in this country have over half the abortions in this country."

Around 75% of abortion patients in 2014 were poor or low-income. Fifty-nine percent had at least one birth.

"The way in which we frame the debate as sort of as a symbolic matter actually

diverges pretty dramatically from the way in which abortion plays out."

Oberman, who has spent years studying the issue, says restricting abortion access disproportionately affects

the financially insecure and adolescents, because wealthier people can afford to travel to areas

where the procedure is available.

They can travel out of state if they need to do so. They can afford to take days off work.

Abortions restrictions don't thwart them as much.

That disparity doesn't bother Scheidler.

"I don't really see a problem with anyone having difficulty getting an abortion.

I think that's good. I think it should be very difficult."

Like many people, Oberman says she once assumed that if abortion

was illegal in a country, then the nation would see fewer incidents of it.

"Abortion rates actually are higher in countries with the strictest laws around the world."

"Even if abortion is completely against the law, it doesn't go away. And we know this from looking at countries

around the world like El Salvador, where abortion is completely banned, with no exceptions.

And the abortion rate in El Salvador is actually higher than it is in the United States."

El Salvador is a place where abortion has been completely outlawed since 1998.

Women and girls face a prison sentence of between two and eight years for having an abortion.

It's a place where clandestine abortions are common

and where a woman named Teodora del Carmen Vásquez spent

11 years in jail for the stillbirth of her child.

El Salvador is one of six Latin American countries with total abortion bans.

And generally speaking, the Global South has the world's most restrictive abortion laws.

The lowest abortions rates are in North America and Europe, with northern Europe having the lowest rates.

Many European countries also have federally paid family planning programs ranging from 35 weeks to a year.

France gives expectant mothers 16 weeks off. Germany allows mothers to take up to three years off.

Oberman believes having this type of support for pregnant parents is what contributes

to those decreased rates of abortion.

Scheidler says he'd like to see any support that decreases the number of procedures.

"I'm happy to see any kind of measures that would assist families, that would make it more possible

for women to choose life for their babies. You know, it's often made out that, you know, everyone who is opposed

is, you know, also opposed to healthcare or opposed to any kind of program, any kInd of social programs.

And I just don't see that to be true. Not from where I'm sitting in, it certainly isn't my position."

Scheidler has always been anti-abortion, but not always conservative.

He voted for Bill Clinton, and for a decade identified as an atheist.

And though he doesn't believe it's fair to compare the U.S.'s abortion outlook to countries like El Salvador,

he did say a U.S. with strict abortion laws would probably look more like Ireland.

Until May 2018, Ireland had a nearly total abortion ban.

Ireland has a low abortion rate – 17 per 1,000 women.

Ireland also has public healthcare and six months' paid maternity leave.

Global comparisons aside, if Roe were reversed, there's one big reason the U.S.

wouldn't go back to looking like it did before the ruling.

"The biggest change since 1973 in terms of illegal abortion is the advent of abortion drugs."

You see, even in places where the procedure is restricted, if there's internet access,

then there's accessibility to abortion drugs with a simple search.

But Oberman warns that increasing abortion restrictions will have a tangible cost.

"There will be women who do die from illegal abortion, though. So let's just be clear about that,

because there'll be a population of women who don't access abortion drugs so easily, find out too late in their

pregnancy or who take the wrong drug at the wrong dose. And we also know, we can

predict who those women will be. They'll be the poorest and most marginalized."

The future of reproductive rights is threatened regardless of Roe v. Wade's future. And the

truth is that, for some women in some states, a United States without abortion access

already a reality. It's just that now, many more women are at risk for being in that same pool.

Hey fam. Thanks for much for watching. Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe.

This is one of just many stories we'll be doing leading up to the midterms.

And we want to know what you want to see from us. Give us your story idea in the comments.

And we'll see you next Sunday. Bye.

For more infomation >> What Happens If The U.S. Outlaws Abortion? | AJ+ - Duration: 9:48.

-------------------------------------------

Pres. Moon's interview with Fox News to air Tuesday evening in U.S. - Duration: 0:34.

And during his stay in New York, President Moon will be giving an interview to Fox News,

in which he will explain the outcome and the meaning of his latest summit with North Korean

leader Kim Jong-un.

In his first overseas interview on the subject, the president is likely to press the importance

of bilateral ties between Seoul and Washington in establishing peace on the Korean Peninsula.

That interview is scheduled to be broadcast live Tuesday at SIX PM Eastern Standard Time,...

which will be SEVEN AM, Wednesday here in South Korea.

For more infomation >> Pres. Moon's interview with Fox News to air Tuesday evening in U.S. - Duration: 0:34.

-------------------------------------------

Fareed: EU, US should be celebrating diversity - Duration: 4:08.

For more infomation >> Fareed: EU, US should be celebrating diversity - Duration: 4:08.

-------------------------------------------

Nikki Haley: US not looking to do regime change in Iran - Duration: 9:25.

For more infomation >> Nikki Haley: US not looking to do regime change in Iran - Duration: 9:25.

-------------------------------------------

19941998 Green Box United States Mint Proof Sets - Duration: 8:21.

For more infomation >> 19941998 Green Box United States Mint Proof Sets - Duration: 8:21.

-------------------------------------------

An interview with IL State Rep Keith Wheeler: Nurse advocacy - Duration: 7:26.

who came and did a lot of research and did a really good job explaining what

you believed was the issue and that you dedicated yourself to be a part of how

we were going to pass a Healthcare Prevention Violence Act could you share

a little bit with us as to the trials and tribulations as you went through

working with people from the other side of the of the aisle and how there was

many many stakeholders and how we eventually got to get that bill passed

and signed by the governor not less than a week ago correct there is so

there was a lot of trials and tribulations in this process and this is the story of

a bill that I wish more bills looked like this before they got to the finish line

because there was a lot of negotiation so he started the outset with with one

vehicle which we call vehicles the House Bill in this case House Bill 4100

that a neighboring Representative of mine from the majority party had filed

and I requested that I be added as a chief co-sponsor which is the highest

level of sponsorship that we have in the Illinois House and then I wanted to do

that for a couple of reasons one "A" I wanted to show my support for the fact

we should find a solution and "B" make this not a partisan issue let's put this

in the fact that we can all work together and we all have a role to play

in this and knowing that I'm not an expert of

nursing issues or workplace violence issues or how hospitals function or how you know

prisoners get moved from one place to another and law enforcement all those

are not things I have great depth for but I do have great respect for the

people came and talked to me at the very beginning which happened to be a couple

of nurses and that is how my involvement really began

was the fact that I understood a little bit but more so I understood the

passion and the reality that all these nurses in fact it was bigger than

nurses at the end but the nurses were the impetus for my involvement in this

bill so you start with the fact that I asked to be the chief co-sponsor and then

the bill kind of moves for a while in it's own you know calendar process until we

get some real session and when the session part begins the

negotiations crank up because we have committee meetings they're going to

discuss different possibilities or amendments to this bill in the

background there are discussions that are happening there discussions

with what the primary sponsor as well as with different advocacy organizations

that have their perspective on things the role I chose to play was to work

with the law enforcement side where I have a lot of friends and colleagues who

could give me their perspective of how we could make this move together and not

everyone was happy with the idea of even doing this bill because it's not an easy

one it just wasn't here you do this therefore that solution it wasn't like

this it was much more complicated so everyone had a role to play in moving

this forward so the chief sponsor is working with different groups I was

working with another set of groups and some folks in my mind said we think this

is just not going to work Keith and I'm like well I'm not taking my name off the

bill you're going to have to get this to work and those little nudges and pushes

are all that ultimately got us to a place where more discussions took place

between everybody that's at some points in time to fix little parts of the bill

to the point where you kept moving it forward and moving it forward and the

nurses were engaged and the law enforcement engaged everyone was involved we got

to a place where on the last amendment which I think was the fifth amendment that bill it was agreed

which means that we didn't have to fight anymore it was an answer and an answer

got to the house floor where the chief sponsor got I've been given a speech at

reducing the bill I followed up immediately with a support for that so

that everyone in the floor knew that this was a bipartisan agreed to approach

we worked the process the way it was supposed to be done and it got an unanimous vote

which was something no one thought was even possible

a month before this so happy for that part of it then of course there's one

more problems with the Senate it passes their and then it gets the governor's

desk and you know the governor has a whole lot of stuff to process that he has

to go through that are with his agencies to make sure that they're comfortable

with everything and then there is a big part of it we need everyone to execute the bill not

just pass the bill so there were discussions that we're not going so smoothly for

parts of that and I just got involved there and helped influence the fact that

the governor signed the bill and did the right thing for everybody and briefly

did so but in those processes have to take place that's part of governing

but at the end of the day I get to play a role in different parts of that bill

and I was proud to do that I was happy to do that but it only happened because

nurses came and talked to me about it that is it that is the real bottom line to this whole story well I would like to

thank you for your sincere time and your expertise and your dedication to what

you do here every single day nurses across the state of Illinois thank you

for your help in passing the Violence Prevention Act it was quite a

huge bill that was with many stakeholders and over many months

testimony before committees and both sides of the table coming together it

was it was quite a Kingdom Theory wonderful policy portal example of how

when you have an issue when you have a vehicle and you have the political

environment that that grabs everyone and holds their attention long enough

sustains over months to be able to pass a bill is it's quite an unusual and

wonderful thing especially in the state of Illinois so again thank you so much

for your insight and sharing with nurses how important it is for them to be their

legislators nurse expert constituent and encouraging them to raise that awareness

which aligns so much with political advocacy as nursing patient advocacy and

that they get involved in start building relationships with their legislators I

think it's really valuable to everyone nurses play a hugely important role in our

society and then in our lives in particular when we need them and let me

and let me make another point with you really quick in our legislature there is

there is a 118 of us in the house so every district got nurses

and every nurse I hope will take a moment and get to know the legislator

find a little bit about them and you know begin that relationship process

it's hard to imagine sometimes where your legislator is going to be able to

help in the process there is no way that you could have predicted from my perspective

at least how the role that I could play in house bill 4100 would have ever taking

place I was I was usually supportive of the idea that was the

right thing for us to do but the Representatives that I have in Springfield

helped us move that part forward every relation every

legislator has those types of relationships also they're not the same

ones but we all have a role to play to make this successful for everybody but it

begins with the relationship with our constituent nurses at home thank you so much

For more infomation >> An interview with IL State Rep Keith Wheeler: Nurse advocacy - Duration: 7:26.

-------------------------------------------

Mid September Stroll on State Prep - Duration: 2:20.

For more infomation >> Mid September Stroll on State Prep - Duration: 2:20.

-------------------------------------------

Study finds there are over 22million undocumented immigrants in the US - Duration: 5:56.

A new study has found that the number of undocumented immigrants in the United States is more than double what was previously estimated

 Two Yale professors and an instructor at MIT Sloan School of Management conducted the extensive research and found that there are 22

1million illegal immigrants in the country. The widely estimated number is thought to be around 11

3million, but researchers Edward Kaplan, Jonathan Feinstein and Mohammad Fazel‐Zarandi claim that is way off

'Our original idea was just to do a sanity check on the existing number,' said Kaplan, a professor of operations research at Yale School of Management

  'Instead of a number which was smaller, we got a number that was 50 per cent higher

That caused us to scratch our heads.' Feinstein added: 'There's a number that everybody quotes, but when you actually dig down and say, "What is it based on?" You find it's based on one very specific survey and possibly an approach that has some difficulties

So we went in and just took a very different approach.'   The researchers used operational data such as deportations and visa overstays as well as demographic data like death rates and immigration rates to achieve their number

Kaplan said the model they used is very simple logic. 'The population today is equal to the initial population plus everyone who came in minus everyone who went out

It's that simple,' he said. 'The analysis we've done can be thought of as estimating the size of a hidden population

People who are undocumented immigrants are not walking around with labels on their foreheads

. There are very few numbers we can point to and say, "This is carved in stone".' RELATED ARTICLES Previous 1 Next Illegal immigrant, 28, who claimed he was a Grenfell fire

Nine people, including seven illegal immigrants, are killed. Share this article Share According to Yale Insights, the researchers also found the greatest growth of undocumented immigrants occurred in the 1990s and early 2000s

They also said the population size has been relatively stable since 2008. 'The trajectory is the same

We see the same patterns happening, but they're just understating the actual number of people who have made it here,' said Fazel‐Zarandi, a senior lecturer at the MIT Sloan School of Management and formerly a postdoctoral associate and lecturer in operations at the Yale School of Management

'They are capturing part of this population, but not the whole population,' he added

 All three researchers said they did not conduct the study with a political agenda, but know their findings will get 'pulled and tugged in many ways'

 'Our purpose is just to provide better information,' Feinstein said. 'This paper is not oriented towards politics or policy

I want to be very clear: this paper is about coming up with a better estimate of an important number

' He added: 'We wouldn't want people to walk away from this research thinking that suddenly there's a large influx happening now

It's really something that happened in the past and maybe was not properly counted or documented

For more infomation >> Study finds there are over 22million undocumented immigrants in the US - Duration: 5:56.

-------------------------------------------

Iowa State leaps over Akron for first win of 2018 - Duration: 3:22.

For more infomation >> Iowa State leaps over Akron for first win of 2018 - Duration: 3:22.

-------------------------------------------

HISTORY MADE! US Sheriffs Just Issued Insane Announcement About Their Plan For Trump - Duration: 4:12.

The Gateway Pundit is now reporting that President Trump met with 45 sheriffs who represent 35

states on Wednesday in what is billed as the largest meeting between a President and Sheriffs

seen in while White House.

Then after the meeting, which was hailed as being positive, the 45 sheriffs made their

way to the United States Congress in order to forward a proposed legislative action which

would increase border security and immigration reform.

One which includes the creation of a crowdfunding page which is set up to fund the much needed

Trump Border Wall which neither the Republicans or Democrats in Congress care to get done.

Sheriff Hodgson: "But what's really amazing Mr. President with your strength and purpose

the commitment to your convictions, you have done more in less than two years in supporting

law enforcement and dealing with this illegal immigration problem that we have been asking

solutions on in less than two years.

And again all these sheriffs and sheriffs across this nation are grateful to you for

that, Mr. President.

(applause)…

I want to add one thing that maybe you heard about maybe you did not.

When we were on the hill today we announced that the National Sheriff's Association

has done a crowdfunding page to raise money and mobilize citizens of this nation to get

behind you, to get behind the sheriffs, to build this wall."

Here is more on this via Gateway Pundit:

"WITHOUT BORDER SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION REFORM, MORE AMERICANS WILL CONTINUE TO BE

VICTIMS OF CRIME.

NOW IS THE TIME TO ACT!

100% of your tax deductible donation will go to build the wall on America's southern

border!

Together we can save taxpayer money, make our communities safer and build American Pride!

Congress must act to pass legislation to secure our borders through enforcing immigration

laws, tightening border security, support the replacement and upgrades to current barriers

and fencing and construction of barriers along the U.S. and Mexico international boundary

as requested by those areas where it is needed, suspending and/or monitoring the issuance

of visas to any place where adequate vetting cannot occur, end criminal cooperation and

shelter in cities, counties, and states, and have zero tolerance and increased repercussions

for criminal aliens.

The failure of Congress to create legitimate and comprehensive immigration reform for more

than 20 years has dramatically undermined our ability to keep our communities safe.

This not only puts our law enforcement at serious risk for danger, but further puts

them in an untenable situation of violating our oath and promise to enforce the law.

Further delay and inaction on immigration reform will cost more innocent lives, more

financial hardships, and an even greater decline in the public trust that is essential to the

preservation of our Republic.

Your donation helps us provide the resources necessary to help local law enforcement along

the border take their communities' safety into their own hands."

Something like his was bound to happen after Republican Congressional leaders announced

last year that they shelved President Donald Trump's request for funding with which to

begin construction of his border wall.

The GOP does have its job cut out for them though considering every time there is a threat

of a government shutdown, which is something we are already very used to always sparks

by partisan sparring over how to best appropriate funds for the rest of the year.

This particular wall project has been stalled ever since Senate Democratic leadership announced

that they were not keen on the idea of approving funding to put toward the president's border

wall which would ensure what happened to Kate Steinle and Mollie Tibbits will never happen

again to any other American Citizen or legal resident.

This Democrat move has prompted Republican leadership in Congress who is both concerned

with integrating their allegiance to their party and also to the president with their

allegiance to common sense and reality to reconsider whether or not they are, in fact,

going to go along with Trump's plans to get the border wall funded through Congressional

appropriations.

This is a game which can cost the Republican Party in the midterm elections if their base

is frustrated and decides not to get out and vote.

For more infomation >> HISTORY MADE! US Sheriffs Just Issued Insane Announcement About Their Plan For Trump - Duration: 4:12.

-------------------------------------------

Iran's president claims US ally was behind attack on military parade - Daily News - Duration: 3:44.

Iran's President Hassan Rouhani has said an unnamed US-allied country in the Persian Gulf was behind an attack on a military parade that killed 25 people and wounded around 70

The attack killed at least 25 people and wounded around 70, which was claimed by an Arab separatist group

He could have been referring to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates or Bahrain — close US military allies that view Iran as a regional menace over its support for militant groups across the Middle East

Share this article Share 'All of those small mercenary countries that we see in this region are backed by America

It is Americans who instigate them and provide them with necessary means to commit these crimes,' Mr Rouhani said

Saturday's attack, in which militants disguised as soldiers opened fire on an annual Iranian military parade in the oil-rich southwest, was the deadliest in the country in nearly a decade

 Women and children scattered along with once-marching Revolutionary Guard soldiers as heavy gunfire rang out in Ahvaz

The region's Arab separatists, once only known for nighttime attacks on unguarded oil pipelines, claimed responsibility for the assault, and Iranian officials appeared to believe the claim

Iran summoned diplomats from Britain, Denmark and the Netherlands early on Sunday for allegedly harbouring 'members of the terrorist group' that launched the attack

 Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi later said the UAE ambassador would be summoned over 'partial statements' in support of the group behind the attack

Iranian foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif had earlier blamed regional countries and their 'US masters' for funding and arming the separatists, issuing a stark warning as regional tensions remain high in the wake of the US withdrawal from the Iranian nuclear deal

'Iran will respond swiftly and decisively in defence of Iranian lives,' Mr Zarif wrote on Twitter

The parade was one of many around the country marking the start of Iran's long 1980s war with Iraq, commemorations known as the 'Sacred Defence Week'

The attack killed at least 25 people and wounded around 70, according to the state-run IRNA news agency

At least eight of the dead served in the Revolutionary Guard, an elite paramilitary unit that answers only to Iran's supreme leader, according to the semi-official Tasnim news agency

State TV hours later reported that all four gunmen had been killed.Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei described the attack as exposing 'the atrocity and viciousness of the enemies of the Iranian nation

''Their crime is a continuation of the conspiracies by the US-backed regimes in the region which have aimed at creating insecurity in our dear country,' he said

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét