How many stocks should I have in a portfolio?
Today I'm gonna address this question...
Hi, welcome to the #AskDrWealth series!
We run a lot of investor education and
we receive a lot of questions from the students.
One of the most popular questions of all is;
How many stocks should I have in a portfolio?
So today I'm going to address this question.
I'm Alvin, the founder of Dr Wealth.
So let's begin now.
Let's imagine there's 2 person:
Investor A and investor B all right
say investor A only have five stocks
in his portfolio,
while investor B has 30 stocks.
So you can say one is more concentrated while
B's portfolio is a lot more diversified.
And imagine they equally weight their portfolio
so which means,
for A, each stock represents about 20% of the portfolio
and B is about 3% okay?
So in this case right...
a lot of people would think that
having 5 stocks is better than
having 30 stocks...
because having 5 stocks means
you have less stocks to monitor,
you require less effort to do so.
But actually we beg to defer because
for A,
in this instant is that,
let's say one of the stock goes terribly wrong and
say it's a fraud...
so the stock goes to zero.
What happens is that...
A would actually stand to lose 20% on this portfolio
while if, B has the same exact stock as A,
which turn out to be a fraud,
and goes to zero,
he will only lose 3%.
Which means for A,
it is a very unforgiving portfolio.
So which means A would have to
technically do a lot more work
to ensure that the stock picks are very correct
else he's gonna suffer major losses.
For a concentrated portfolio,
actually one has to do more work
then a diversified portfolio.
So that's point #1.
And for point #2,
is that there are advantages for concentrated portfolio.
And now let's explain that.
Let's say, we draw a time series here.
The vertical axis being the "amount of profits"
or "portfolio value".
And here is the time series.
Let's say, the zero point is here.
So you can either make money
or you can lose money in your portfolio
as time goes by.
So for example,
on the concentrated portfolio,
you can see that the growth
can be very fast on the upside
and it can also be very bad on the downside.
Let's use 'green' for a diversified portfolio.
So let's say you start from the same point,
you don't expect the growth for the portfolio to be
as good as a concentrated portfolio,
if they got the stocks correct.
Likewise, the downside is also lesser,
if they get things wrong along the way.
So which means the diversified portfolio
you have lower downside
which we have mentioned previously in point #1,
but it also have lesser upside,
compared to a concentrated portfolio, in this case.
So in other words, if let's say you are someone who
is willing to go for higher returns,
you need to be able to stomach greater risk.
Wssentially that's what is trying to say.
So it depends on how you want to see it.
I would say that if you're an experienced investor,
it makes sense to do a concentrated portfolio.
But if you are a beginner,
you should be doing a diversified portfolio
it goes back to point #1,
that it is a more forgiving portfolio
if you diversify your stocks,
while it is more unforgiving
if you concentrate your position.
So I would say, if you want to
be a good investor,
you can aim for a concentrated portfolio.
And if you're beginner,
go for a diversified portfolio.
And the next question that we usually get is
How many stocks is considered as 'diversified'?
So research has found that golden number is
actually 15!
If you have 15 stocks in different sectors and industries,
you would have reduce your unsystematic risk
or in other words stock picking risk,
by 90%!
So anything above 15,
you have marginal benefits of diversification.
If you are starting out,
and you want to buy stocks,
I think you should have minimally 15 stocks
in your portfolio for start.
So that's my answer to this question.
I hope that you have a greater understanding on portfolio diversification.
For more infomation >> How Many Stocks Should I Have In My Portfolio | #AskDrWealth - Duration: 4:48.-------------------------------------------
"How many of you can think of marrying a person with disability?" | Manju Sharma | kanthari TALKS - Duration: 9:46.
-------------------------------------------
How Many Chinese Spies Are in the US? - Duration: 13:02.
On this episode of China Uncensored,
the head of the FBI has warned
that the CCP has spies
all over the United States—
including people who appear to be
ordinary students and employees.
Hi, welcome back to China Uncensored.
I'm your host Chris Chappell.
You know, some people call me paranoid.
At least that's what I imagine they're saying
behind my back.
But let me tell you,
you may laugh at this tinfoil hat now,
but I've heard from a very reliable source,
there are spies!
Spies everywhere!!!
Oh no, my source isn't the homeless guy
down on 10th avenue.
I'm talking about head of the FBI Christopher Wray.
"One of the things we're trying to do
is view the China threat as not just
a whole of government threat,
but a whole of society threat on their end."
Oh whoa, all Chinese people are a threat?
That sounds like something
my racist uncle Ted would say.
I mean seriously,
the head of the FBI is basically saying
Americans must band together
to resist the yellow menace?
I haven't heard anything that racist since...
the 1943 Batman movie.
"Known as Little Tokyo.
Since a wise government rounded up
all those shifty eyed Japs…"
Whoa, that was a dark night.
But back to FBI Director Christopher Wray.
He was speaking at
Senate Intelligence Committee hearing.
And China was a big concern.
"The biggest issue of our time...
is China and the risk they pose.
I'm not sure in the 240 some odd year history
of this nation we have ever faced
a competitor and potential advisory of this scale,
scope and capacity.
Wray and other leaders of US Intelligence agencies
like the NSA and CIA released this report,
detailing the biggest threats facing the United States.
And China is named dropped a lot.
Cyber espionage, intellectual property theft,
space weapons, drug warfare—
it's not looking good.
Also, the intelligence community
does not think you should buy
Chinese cell phones,
because they could be spying on you.
And when it comes to spying,
the NSA probably knows what they're talking about.
But it was Christopher Wray's comments
about Chinese students studying in the United States
that got some people's backs up.
"Use of non traditional collectors,
especially in the academic setting,
whether it's professors, scientists, students..
.it's across basically every discipline,
and I think the level of naivete
on the part of the academic sector
about this creates its own issues,
they're exploiting the very open
research and development environment
that we have, which we all revere,
but they're taking advantage of it."
The idea that all Chinese students are
potential spies for the Chinese Communist Party
is a bit shocking.
Especially to China's Foreign Ministry.
"I don't know where the United States'
sense of insecurity comes from."
Well, that sense of insecurity
probably comes from the fact that
the Chinese Communist Party has been
actively trying to influence
and infiltrate the United States.
The CCP has documented this
in its own strategic papers.
The way Christopher Wray explained it,
he said that it's not just official CCP agents
doing the infiltration and spy work.
It's "non-traditional intelligence collectors"—
like Chinese students at American universities,
and Chinese workers inside American companies
who are gathering small pieces of intelligence
on a large scale.
Christopher Wray's statement has upset
a lot of Chinese communities inside the US.
The organization United Chinese Americans said,
"painting all Chinese students
and indeed Chinese in America
with such a broad brush
as a national security threat
is paranoid, inflammatory,
un-American, and simply wrong."
The Organization of Chinese Americans called it,
"Dishonest and insulting."
And John C. Yang,
head of Asian Americans Advancing Justice,
told the Daily Beast,
"We cannot have every Chinese student or scientist
assumed guilty until proven innocent
of a national security threat."
So was the director of the FBI onto something,
or was he just being racist and paranoid?
For more on this,
I'm joined by China Uncensored's
senior Chinese person,
Shelley Zhang.
Shelley?
Thanks, Chris.
So Shelley,
was FBI director Christopher Wray
being very racist?
Or just a little bit racist?How about not racist?
But he said that all Chinese students
are a potential threat.
That's not what he said.
He said that the Chinese government
uses students and other academics as spies.
And that's not racist Chris,
it's just true.
You mean there really are
spies everywhere?
Where did I put that tinfoil hat?
Calm down.
We're not talking about James Bond, here.
Sure, the CCP uses professional spies.
But they also use part-time spies.
Part-time spies?
What, like they need some extra cash on the side?
Or they're pressured into it,
or told they're fulfilling their patriotic duty.
These aren't professional spies.
They're just ordinary students,
or employees,
or business owners who are in the US
for legitimate reasons.
The CCP just asks them to pass on information
every once in a while.
What kind of information?
Maybe you're a grad student
doing research in a lab.
Maybe you just take a few photos
of what you're working on
and send it in an email.
Are there a lot of these
unprofessional spies?
Well, it's hard to know.
But according to this article,
a Chinese diplomat who defected said last year
that Australia had about 500 professional spies,
and up to 700 of these part-time spies.
That might not sound like much,
but if the CCP has the same number in the US,
adjusted for population,
the US would have about 16,000 Chinese spies.
16,000 sounds like a lot of spies.
And I assume there could be even more here
because America is way more important than Australia.
Riiight...
But remember that there are more than
330,000 Chinese nationals studying in the US,
so it still would be a very small percentage.
So on a scale of one to infinity,
how worried should we be
about Chinese spies in the US?
Not that worried.
That's not the answer I was expecting.
Look, should we be aware of
what the CCP is doing?
Yes.
And it's important that the FBI is on it.
But most of us aren't in a position
to stop Chinese spies.
Hey, speak for yourself.
Ok, sure.
Look, I think the Asian American groups
were overreacting to what the FBI director said.
But they're also right in that we shouldn't start
another yellow peril red scare.
We can't suspect every Chinese person
of being a spy.
I was born in China.
Does that make me a spy?
I don't know.
Does it?
Are you serious?
Hey, you're the one who brought it up.
Ok, you got me.
The Communist Party secretly trained me
in espionage tactics until I left China
when I was three years old,
and since then I've been playing the long game.
First, I waited for YouTube to be invented.
Then I joined a YouTube channel
that exposes the Chinese regime.
Now I'm just waiting for the day
when I can take over the channel
and start broadcasting communist propaganda.
I can't believe you just said all that.
I'm not a spy, Chris.
Oh, I believe you.
You would make a terrible spy.
You just admitted everything!
Yes I did.
There is something that FBI Director Wray
talked about though,
that's even more important for Americans
to know about.
The CCP's influence activities.
How is that more important
than worrying about spies?
The Party puts a lot of effort into influencing
how the rest of the world sees China.
And they can do it in sneaky ways
that are hard to detect.
Like using the Confucius Institutes,
which the Chinese government sets up
in foreign schools and universities
to teach a version of Chinese culture
that's approved by the Communist Party.
I still think spying is a bigger issue.
Well, they're actually kind of related.
This is what Director Wray was talking about
when he said the FBI viewed
what the CCP is doing
as a "whole of society" threat.
Whether it's spying or propaganda,
the CCP will use all of Chinese society
to get what they want.
Here's another example.
The Chinese Students and Scholars Associations—
or CSSAs.
These groups are set up in universities
across the United States.
On the surface,
they exist to support Chinese exchange students,
organize fun group activities,
and so on.
But the CSSAs can also be
connected to the Chinese government
and help spread the Party line on China issues.
According to a defector
from China's Ministry of State Security,
the CCP views CSSAs as "information collection"
and propaganda organizations.
So they're part-time spying on us?
No.
Well, maybe some people are.
We don't know.
But we do know that CSSAs definitely help
the CCP push certain views.
Like last year when the Dalai Lama
came to speak at UC San Diego,
the CSSA there kicked up a fuss...
after coordinating with the Chinese Consulate in LA.
And this isn't something new.
In 2007,
a human rights lawyer
came to Columbia University
to give a speech about
forced organ harvesting in China.
The CSSA organized Chinese students
to protest that, too.
On the Columbia University CSSA's website,
they boasted that their constitution was reviewed
by the local Chinese consulate,
and their advisory board consisted of two members...
also from the Chinese consulate.
Wait a minute, these CSSAs
are directly working with the Chinese government?
Some of them are.
This Foreign Policy article showed that
the Georgetown CSSA gets half of its annual
operating budget from the Chinese Embassy.
People have been digging up other links as well.
Here's a video from the George Washington University CSSA
saying that they are directed by the Chinese Embassy,
found by the same reporter.
The University of Tennessee CSSA
says they get funding from the Embassy.
They also require members
to believe in the one China policy.
The Southwestern CSSA,
which is an umbrella organization that includes
CSSAs from 26 US universities,
requires any candidates running for office
to be approved by the Chinese Consulate in LA.
I could go on.
Please don't.
A lot of those statements you showed
are in Chinese.
Yeah, they don't always translate them to English.
Are they trying to hide their links to the CCP
by using a language spoken by 1.3 billion people?
These people would make terrible spies.
Well, remember, a lot of the spying going on here
is actually the CCP using Chinese students
to spy on each other.
Just to make sure that they're
not doing anything out of line.
Here's a case of a Chinese student activist
who recorded a call from the Chinese police
asking him to spy on fellow activists.
Chinese students in Australia
have found things they said in class
were reported back to the Chinese police
by other students.
Think about it.
Having something you say
in a college class outside China
reported to Chinese authorities.
That's awful.
I wouldn't want to be held responsible
for anything I said in college.
Ok, so you've convinced me that this is
an issue that's at least as important as spying.
Is there anything we can do about this?
Well, obviously we should all expose
what the CCP is doing.
But besides that,
I think the most important thing we can do
is to separate the CCP
from ordinary Chinese people.
We need to understand that the Communist Party
has a very specific agenda
that they use Chinese people for.
But we shouldn't blame all Chinese people
for what the CCP is doing.
But that's not the way
a lot of Chinese people see it.
Well, that's true.
The CCP has done a great job
of making Chinese people think
that the Communist Party is the same thing
as the country, and the people.
If we do the same thing,
we're helping them.
Look, imagine being a Chinese student
here in the US.
It's a completely different language and culture.
You can be pretty isolated
from mainstream American society.
And you're constantly told,
by Chinese media,
by the Chinese education system,
by your friends,
that America just wants to keep China down—
and therefore keep you down.
If people start calling you a Chinese spy,
doesn't that just make you believe it's true?
So what are you saying?
I'm saying:
Don't vilify Chinese people.
Treat them like individuals.
Isn't that part of what
makes America great?
So you're saying we should...
make America great again?
Why do I even bother?
Thanks Shelley.
So what do you think?
Leave your comments below.
Once again, I'm Chris Chappell.
See you next time.
With basically every company
desperately trying to get into the China market,
and selling out in the process,
it's hard to find advertisers
willing to support China Uncensored.
But Thrive Life believes in our show,
and, wants to feed you.
They have ready to go meal delivery service
with gluten free, organic, and GMO free options.
If you make a purchase through the link below,
China Uncensored gets a commission.
You'll be supporting the show you love,
and getting some pretty great tasting food as well.
-------------------------------------------
Sing and Sign How Many Legs | ASL Baby and Toddler Song - Duration: 1:56.
how many legs does your favorite animal half well my favorite animal is a cow
and they have four legs so sing and sign along with this song and figure out and
learn about how many legs all these different animals have
cows they walk hard for makes mommy walks onto
no lace how many legs have you won two
he's won four makes daddy walks or two
know how many legs have you - so how many legs does a cow have they have four
right so make up your own verses think about animals that have four legs or six
legs you could do that and what animals that have no legs would be like a worm
or a snake so make it make it fun sing it any way you want
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét