Auto news on Youtube Dec 3 2017

Muslim Cop Respected By Many, Until Fellow Officers See What�s On His Phone

A police officer was a well-respected public servant in his community and a prime example

to dispel �Islamophobia.� However, as soon as authorities saw what was on his phone,

Mohammad Arshad was immediately placed in handcuffs.Liberals have effectively silenced

many into refraining from even talking about the waves of Muslim asylum seekers committing

heinous crimes across Europe, but it�s not only migrants holed up in refugee centers

who are prowling our streets for their latest victim.

The Daily Star reports that a UK police officer has been found guilty of 17 charges after

investigators discovered horrifying images and messages on his cell phone.

Mohammad Arshad, 35, used his career as a policeman to lure, groom, and sexually assault

numerous vulnerable children in his personal rape ring.

Authorities found lewd pictures of children on his Blackberry phone, and more than 188

images of children were discovered on his computers upon searching his home.

After Arshad was charged with 9 counts of engaging children in sex acts, 3 counts of

sex with a child, 2 counts of meeting children following sexual grooming, 1 count of rape,

1 count of forcing a child to watch sexual acts, and 1 count of paying for the sexual

services of a child, the court heard the stomach-churning details of his debauched abuse.

Wearing an Islamic skull-cap as he awaited sentencing, Arshad was found guilty of molesting

and raping 12 girls under the age of 16, the youngest being only 13, according to the Luton

on Sunday.

The thirteenth victim, a girl aged 16, was the oldest of the children, all of whom are

legally too young to consent to sexual activity with an adult.

Of course, all of Arshad�s known victims were abused during his stint as a Luton officer,

which he used to coerce minors into despicable acts.

One brave 14-year-old girl explained how Arshad lured her into the back of his patrol car

and raped her.

�We were driving along a lane and stopped and pulled into this field,� the child told

the court.

�His hand was rubbing my leg.

I asked him to stop.

He wanted me to get into the back of the car.

I said, �No.� He asked me 6 or 7 times.

He was laughing.

I can�t remember why, but I ended up sitting in the back of the car.

The seats were leather.� Arshad then pushed her down, removed her pants,

and proceeded to rape her.

The victim admitted that he finally stopped because of her screaming and resistance.

Arshad defended himself before the jury, claiming that he has no interest in underage girls,

but that he couldn�t remember how many minors he�s had sex with.

�I don�t remember.

It is hard for me to say,� Arshad testified.

�It is hard for me to put a number on it.� When prosecutor James Newton-Price asked him

if he felt any guilt over contacting underage girls for the purpose of sex for money, Arshad

had very little remorse.

�A bit of shame, but not if it is not illegal,� he responded.

�Religiously, yes, but I have not committed a crime.�

Fortunately, the Luton judge told Arshad to expect a �substantial� prison sentence.

However, it�s his defense, not just his crimes, that should serve as a warning to

us all.

Not only does Arshad believe he�s done nothing wrong, he also holds his religion above the

law of the land.

This is consistent with Muslims in the West, especially migrants who�ve trekked from

an Islamic country.

In Islam, Sharia law is above any man-made law, and it should be respected by followers

as being superior.

This poses a major problem for Western host countries, as violence, slavery, and pedophilia

are not necessarily illegal in Sharia courts.

Because the 53-year-old Islamic Prophet Muhammad had sex with his 9-year-old child bride at

the behest of Allah, it is contradictory to Islamic doctrine to outlaw pedophilia.

It would literally be an admission that Islam�s �perfect man� and chosen messenger was

wrong to model this behavior, and is, therefore, a hypocritical charlatan.

We are welcoming into the West a group of people who are incompatible with our laws

and culture.

Foolishly, we are expecting that a simple change of location will convince them to leave

their lifelong beliefs behind.

For more infomation >> Muslim Cop Respected By Many, Until Fellow Officers See What's On His Phone - Duration: 4:46.

-------------------------------------------

What If The Hydrogen Bomb Was Dropped On North Korea? - Duration: 4:02.

What if we drop a hydrogen bomb on north korea?

Perhaps you have asked yourself this question after Donald trump said he would 'totally

destroy north korea if necessary to defend the united states or its allies.

So what would happen if the United States dropped a hydrogen bomb on north korea?

Would it be good, wood it be bad?

That's what we're going to talk about, right now on lifes biggest questions.

Hello and welcome back to LBQ, I'm your host, charlotte dobre, don't forget to hit

that thumbs up, subscribe and let us know in the comments below what topics you would

like to see next.

To understand what might happen if we dropped an atomic bomb on North Korea, we must look

at the last time the united states dropped a similar bomb on an enemy country.

When America dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it killed every person within

a mile radius.

The death toll was 200 thousand.

But experts say those atomic bombs were little guys compared to a hydrogen bomb.

Hydrogen bombs are a lot more adcanced and a lot more powerful.

The hydrogen bomb has a potential of being 1000 times more powerful than the atomic bomb.

They cause bigger explosions, which in turn causes more heat, radiation, and shockwaves.

The reach is much larger with a hydrogen bomb, anywhere between 5 to 10 miles.

Both bombs have the capability to kill people in seconds.

In the aftermath of the atomic bomb, people's internal organs ruptured, buildings were crushed.

Experts say that a hydrogen bomb could kill significantly more people than the atomic

bomb, as well as wipe out entire cities.

If the US drop the hydrogen bomb on North Koreas capital, Pyongyang for instance, it

would be completely wiped off the map.

2.5 million people live in Pyongyang, it would be assumed that most if not all of those people

would be killed instantly.

Those 2.5 million people are for the most part, innocent civilians that are victims

of a tyrannical government.

Just because they have a crazy person for a leader, that doesn't mean the deserve

to die.

Furthermore, everyone that lives in the region would be affected.

One has to remember that South Korea shares a border with north korea.

South korea is our ally.

China is also very close to north korea, there is only 100 miles of distance between the

largest chinese city along the north Korean border and Pyongyang.

Japan is also our ally, and they are only around 400 miles from north korea, and they

would feel the effects of the fallout as well.

If the US drops a hydrogen bomb on north korea, they are effectively putting everyone in the

surrounding area at risk too.

Apart from the extensive loss of life, a dropping hydrogen bomb on North Korea would have serious

consequences for the environment.

The explosion will send radioactive particles into the air, soil and water.

Wind will carry the particles hundreds of miles away from the explosion.

Seeing as North Korea is very close to the pacific ocean, this could cause serious problems

for marine life as well.

The smoke could block out sunlight, making it impossible for plants to use photosynthesis

to survive.

The radioactive particles could devastate plants, animals as well as humans.

Radioactive particles damage cells by causing changes in genes, causing mutations in future

generations.

The effects of radiation will have lasting effects as well.

When the United States tested a series of atomic bombs by Bikini Atoll in the marshall

islands.

Residents that lived anywhere near the site had to move, as there were high levels of

radiation in the crops and water.

nearly 60 years later, the island is still uninhabitable.

The difference between dropping the atomic bomb that was dropped on japan at the end

of world war 2, and the possibility of dropping the hydrogen bomb on north korea, is that

japan attacked the united states first at pearl harbour.

At the time this video was filmed, north korea has not attacked the united states yet.

Attacking a country who has not attacked first would effectively make the united states a

war criminal.

The atomic bomb was used to effectively end world war two, and perhaps deter anyone from

ever dropping a bomb like it again, let alone a hydrogen bomb that is 1000 times more powerful.

If the united states dropped an atomic bomb on north korea, it would change how the rest

of the world feels about them.

Washington's influence in Europe and the rest of the world would fade significantly,

as all the allies attempt to distance themselves from the nation who violated its own fundamental

values of human rights.

To this day, a hygrogen bomb has never been used in battle by any country, and lets hope

it does not start with north korea.

I'm charlotte dobre for life's biggest questions, if you liked this video, you should

check out dont forget to click that bell notification so you never miss an upload.

For more infomation >> What If The Hydrogen Bomb Was Dropped On North Korea? - Duration: 4:02.

-------------------------------------------

Man Fires 200-Yard Pistol Shot at What He Thought Was a Deer… But It Was a Woman - Duration: 4:31.

Man Fires 200-Yard Pistol Shot at What He Thought Was a Deer… But It Was a Woman

When one New York hunter lined up his shot at what he believed to be a deer on the day before Thanksgiving, he didnt know he was about to change his life forever, and end another.

Thomas B. Jadlowski, 34, shot and killed Rosemary Billquist, 43 — a woman walking her dogs in the rural town of Sherman — because he failed to properly identify his target.

After he took the shot, Jadlowski told authorities, he heard a scream and ran to see what was the matter, according to The Buffalo News. He then learned his fatal mistake. He attempted to help her.

He put pressure on the wound, and called emergency services. Billquist was rushed by emergency response personnel to a hospital, where she died.

The tragedy could have been avoided if Jadlowski had simply followed the rule of law: Hunting in the area is illegal after sunset, which occurred at 4:46 p.m., on the day of the shooting, according to the Buffalo News.

The call reporting an accidental shooting came in at 5:24 p.m. Combining odd hours and a judgment lapse in a hunter assessing a target is a recipe for tragedies of this nature.

Dale Dunkelberger, master instructor for firearms for the state Department of Environmental Conservations hunter education program, told The Buffalo News that hunters have to understand there are other people using trails, using parks in areas where we as sportsmen hunt.

Dunkelberger, who told the News he is very familiar with Sherman, said the facts dont seem to be in doubt.

In this case, it appears from what I gathered this was after sunset, and he shouldnt have been out there hunting after sunset, he said.

Youre done. Thats the law.. Now, not only is someone dead and her family shattered, but the hunter is facing criminal charges.

According to The Buffalo News, a grand jury on Thursday indicted Jadlowski on a charge of second-degree manslaughter in the shooting.

He surrendered to the Chautauqua County Sheriffs Office and a judge set bail at $50,000 cash or $100,000 property.

It wasnt clear if Jadlowski made bail Thursday. Hes facing 15 years in prison.

Billquist was a marathon runner and hospital worker who is survived by her husband, Jamie.

Hundreds of Sherman-area residents turned out for her funeral Wednesday, The Buffalo News reported.

As conservatives, and as Americans who cherish both the rule of law and our right to keep and bear arms, it is absolutely imperative that victims in tragedies like this — tragedies that could have been avoided with good judgment and lawful behavior — are given the justice they deserve.

And as sorry as Jadlowski might be, hes going to need to bear the consequences of his actions.

What do you think about this story? Please share this on Facebook and Twitter and let us know!.

What do you think should happen to the hunter in this case? Scroll down to comment below!.