BREAKING!!
HE JUST DID IT…
Hillary BUSTED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY!
Dan Backer just pieced together an epic takedown of Hillary Clinton that's based on FEC reports,
memos by Clinton's campaign manager, and public statements from people like Donna Brazile
and many others who chose to speak out openly.
Could this information be the final stake in the heart of Hillary Clinton's alleged
crimes?
Let's analyze the information and see where it takes us.
The information dates back to 2014 when Shaun McCutcheon won favor from the Supreme Court.
As reported by Investors: "In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled in favor
of my client, Alabama engineer Shaun McCutcheon, in his challenge to the Federal Election Commission's
(FEC) outdated "aggregate limits," which effectively limited how many candidates any
one donor could support.
Anti-speech liberals railed against McCutcheon's win, arguing it would create supersized "Joint
Fundraising Committees" (JFCs).
In court, they claimed these JFCs would allow a single donor to cut a multimillion-dollar
check, and the JFC would then route funds through dozens of participating state parties,
who would then funnel it back to the final recipient.
Democracy 21 President Fred Wertheimer claimed the Supreme Court's McCutcheon v. FEC ruling
would lead to "the system of legalized bribery recreated that existed prior to Watergate."
The Supreme Court, in ruling for us, flatly stated such a scheme would still be illegal."Then
comes the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) which involves $500 million that was funneled in
such a way that the Supreme Court had recently said was illegal.
Cutting a big check, sending money to various places, then funneling it all back to the
place it was initially determined to go after hopping the money over a million hurdles.
Trump's team has rightfully filed an FEC complaint to investigate the matters with
the $500 million.
The Committee to Defend the President has filed an FEC complaint against Hillary Clinton's
campaign, Democratic National Committee (DNC), Democratic state parties and Democratic mega-donors.
As Fox News reported, we documented the Democratic establishment "us[ing] state chapters as
straw men to circumvent campaign donation limits and launder(ing) the money back to
her campaign."
The 101-page complaint focused on the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) — the $500 million joint
fundraising committee between the Clinton campaign, DNC, and dozens of state parties
— which did exactly that the Supreme Court declared would still be illegal.
It's reported that HVF was taking, or asking for, significant six-figure donations from
well-known entities such as clothing companies and celebrities like Seth MacFarlane.
If they were given a donation, then the money was taken through different parties, and it
seems like the cash eventually made it back to Clinton's hands.
The smaller number we're working within this is about $84 million, and that could
make it the most massive campaign scandal involving finance in American history.
Backer continues his report: "Here's what we know.
Campaign finance law is incredibly complex and infamous for its lack of clarity.
As I've explained before, its complexity is a feature, not a bug.
Major political players with the resources to hire the very few attorneys who practice
campaign finance law benefit from the complexity that keeps others out.
Perhaps HVF's architects thought so too, and assumed that if no one understands what's
happening, no one would complain.
Here's what you can do, legally.
Per election, an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state
party committee, and (during the 2016 cycle) $33,400 to a national party's main account.
These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of
those contribution limits — it's legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit
for any one recipient.
And state parties can make unlimited transfers to their national party.
Here's what you can't do, which the Clinton machine appeared to do anyway.
As the Supreme Court made clear in McCutcheon v. FEC, the JFC may not solicit or accept
contributions to circumvent base limits, through "earmarks" and "straw men" that are
ultimately excessive — there are five separate prohibitions here.
On top of that, six-figure donations either never actually passed through state party
accounts or were never actually under state party control, which adds false FEC reporting
by HVF, state parties, and the DNC to the laundry list.
Finally, as Donna Brazile and others admitted, the DNC placed the funds under the Clinton
campaign's direct control, a massive breach of campaign finance law that ties the conspiracy
together.
Democratic donors, knowing the funds would end up with Clinton's campaign, wrote six-figure
checks to influence the election — 100 times larger than allowed."
HVF had some shady business going on with significant donations that were mixed up in
false FEC reports by multiple entities.
Was money being reported as being sent to one place, but indeed appearing in another?
Was the cash being reportedly tossed in various locations to make it harder to track?
HVF bundled these megagifts and, on a single day, reported transferring money to all participating
state parties, some of which would then show up on FEC reports filed by the DNC as transferring
the exact same dollar amount on the exact same day to the DNC.
Yet not all the state parties reported either receiving or transferring those sums.
Did any of these transfers actually happen?
Or were they just paper entries to mask direct transfers to the DNC?
This sounds like something that everyday Americans only see in well thought out movies, but those
movies always seem to end with the perpetrator finally getting caught by an intelligent investigator
who finally pieces that puzzle together and solves the crime unmasking someone no one
suspected.
Is Hillary Clinton guilty of crimes or is she just the name that will be thrown under
the bus by a much bigger force?
Is there more to this than just the money being pushed around in ways that the Supreme
Court might find illegal?
If anyone goes down for this, that won't be the end of it.
Under every major crime, there are tons of little mysterious odds and ends, but there
could also be a more prominent king of the hill.
Is Hillary the king of the mountain in this investigation or is there someone above her
calling the shots?
For more infomation >> BREAKING!! HE JUST DID IT… Hillary BUSTED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY! - Duration: 7:12.-------------------------------------------
U.S. Coast Guard Members golf at President's country club in West Palm Beach - Duration: 1:49.
For more infomation >> U.S. Coast Guard Members golf at President's country club in West Palm Beach - Duration: 1:49. -------------------------------------------
SHOCKINGGG! HE JUST DID IT… Hillary INVOLVED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY! - Duration: 10:08.
For more infomation >> SHOCKINGGG! HE JUST DID IT… Hillary INVOLVED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY! - Duration: 10:08. -------------------------------------------
The Star Spangled Banner (United States National Anthem) - Sung By: Mikku the Singer - Duration: 1:07.
Oh say can you see,
By the dawn's
early lights,
What so proudly we hailed,
at
the twilight's last
gleaming. Whose broad stripes and
bright stars, through the perilous
fight, o'er the
ramparts we watched,
were so gallantly streaming,
and the rocket's
red glare,
the bombs bursting
in air,
gave proof
through the night,
that our flag was still there.
Oh say does that star
spangled
banner yet wave,
o'er the land
of the free...
and the home of the
brave!
-------------------------------------------
U.S. Military $110 Million Dollar 'Project Gray Wolf' Has North Korea On Their Heels - Duration: 5:55.
The impending conflict with North Korea has put quite a bit of stress on
international relations as countries are forced to take sides
North Korea's neighbors have even had to cut off their trade relations with the
dictatorship in an effort to force the country to end its nuclear projects
sadly none of these efforts have convinced the North Korean government to
cease and desist their F campaign to start World War 3
even with the possibility of conflict the United States has stood firm with
President Trump now heading the armed forces unlike his predecessor the
president doesn't believe in negotiating with terrorists
which is exactly what Kim jong-un has been determined to be somehow the
petulant leader of the tiny country still believes that he would win in
all-out war and continues his threats as of just days ago though the tables
may have turned the conservative Tribune reports that the recent advancements
made by the United States military should have jong-un running for the
hills begging the United States not to go to
war with him in a 110 million dollar dollar contract
Lockheed Martin has announced that it will begin working on a program simply
known as project gray wolf this contract will create the first weapon of its kind
swarming missiles that is sure to strike terror into the hearts of the United
States enemies including North Korea's Kim jong-un according to the UK Daily
Mail the missiles will be a low-cost missile with built-in networked
collaborative behaviors or swarming behaviors the first demonstrations will
be conducted with an f16 aircraft but it will ultimately work with the f-35 f15
f-18 b1 b2 and b-52 aircraft in addition to the f-16
Lockheed Martin's concept for the gray wolf missile will be an affordable
counter iad missile that will operate efficiently in highly contested
environments said Haddie Murad advanced missiles program director for Lockheed
Martin missiles and fire control using the capabilities envisioned for later
spirals our system is being designed to maximize modularity allowing our
customer to incorporate advanced technologies such as more lethal
warheads or more fuel-efficient engines when those systems become available
in essence these missiles will be able to communicate to each other the
missiles will initially work with the f-16 fighter jet but will work with
other planes as well the f-35 f15 f-18 b1 b2 and b-52 aircraft will all
eventually get this new technology advanced missiles program director for
Lockheed Martin missiles and fire control Haddie Murad told the Daily Mail
Oh your system is being designed to maximize modularity allowing our
customer to incorporate advanced technologies such as more lethal
warheads or more fuel-efficient engines when those systems become available the
new advancements outlined here are just another reminder of how much more
advanced the United States is than North Korea not only are they working on
nuclear technology that we've had for decades they're trying to overtake a
technological mark us who isn't standing still none of the US military is sitting
around on our hands waiting for North Korea to strike our progress goes on
two missiles that swarm Lockheed Martin is also creating a high-powered fiber
laser for fighter jets according to Daily Mail the new laser
system would allow fighter jets to take down targets from the air in contrast to
previous systems which were mounted on vehicles or ships under a twenty six
point three million dollar contract from the Air Force Research Lab Lockheed
Martin plans to develop a directed-energy system for aircraft with
plans to test the technology by 2021 Lockheed Martin has had success with
similar ground-based systems now the company is moving toward developing that
same technology for airborne systems while all of this seems pretty amazing
the swarm missiles won't be ready until 2019 while the laser weapons for
aircraft are looking at a much later date regardless as phones TVs and even
cars become smarter rest assured you're going to see that happen with our
weapons systems all the more having missiles that can communicate with each
other is some pretty amazing technology as Trump continues his presidency look
for more technological advances as well as a stronger military if there's one
thing we know about President Donald Trump it's this he wants our military to
be the best trained and best-equipped military in the world and we'll do
whatever it takes to make it happen project gray wolf does just that
every self-respecting American knows that our military can outperform North
Korea no contest the question that comes to mind is why what makes us inherently
better while some might say that it's because we were bigger that's probably
not the case even though the North Korean dictator was trying to have the
best possible dictator experience by cracking down on his people just the
opposite happened North Korea's population is essentially
25 million hostages constantly in fear of their hostage taker even though this
might seem like a good way to motivate people an environment of fear is not one
that creativity and ingenuity thrives in in order to be the best you've got to
allow people to be free which is what makes America one of the most advanced
nations on earth Kim jong-un has basically cut off his nose to spite his
face and if he insists on war with the United States he's going to find that
out the hard way
-------------------------------------------
Blue States Are In For A Mass Exodus - Duration: 2:17.
Blue States
Are In For A Mass Exodus
It turns out that people hate living in blue states, where lax drug laws, tight gun control,
socialist taxation, and liberal social circles make the place uninhabitable.
According to The Daily Caller, three major blue states lost a record number of citizens
in 2016-2017.
New York saw the worst exodus of people, with about 190,000 residents fleeing from July
1, 2016 to July 1, 2017, according to U.S. Census Bureau data released last week.
�New York�s domestic out-migration during that time period was about the same as it
was in the same time 2015 and 2016,� reports The Daily Caller.
�Since 2010, the state�s outflow of just over 1 million residents has exceeded that
of every other state, both in absolute terms and as a share of population, according to
the free-market think tank Empire Center.�
The same could not be said for President Obama�s home state of Illinois, which has now dropped
from the fifth to the sixth-most populous state in 2017.
The fifth-most populous state is Pennsylvania, which swung red for Trump in the previous
election.
The once golden state of California lost 138,000 residents.
Like New York, it has weathered the storm by having the largest influx of international
migrants.
� READ MORE
-------------------------------------------
BREAKING!! HE JUST DID IT… Hillary BUSTED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY! - Duration: 6:24.
BREAKING!!
HE JUST DID it… Hillary BUSTED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY!
Dan Backer just pieced together an epic takedown of Hillary Clinton that's based on FEC reports,
memos by Clinton's campaign manager, and public statements from people like Donna Brazile
and many others who chose to speak out openly.
Could this information be the final stake in the heart of Hillary Clinton's alleged
crimes?
Let's analyze the information and see where it takes us.
The information dates back to 2014 when Shaun McCutcheon won favor from the Supreme Court.
As reported by Investors: "In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled in favor
of my client, Alabama engineer Shaun McCutcheon, in his challenge to the Federal Election Commission's
(FEC) outdated "aggregate limits," which effectively limited how many candidates any
one donor could support.
Anti-speech liberals railed against McCutcheon's win, arguing it would create supersized "Joint
Fundraising Committees" (JFCs).
In court, they claimed these JFCs would allow a single donor to cut a multimillion-dollar
check, and the JFC would then route funds through dozens of participating state parties,
who would then funnel it back to the final recipient.
Democracy 21 President Fred Wertheimer claimed the Supreme Court's McCutcheon v Federal
Election Commission ruling would lead, to "the system of legalized bribery recreated
that existed prior to Watergate."
The Supreme Court, in ruling for us, flatly stated such a scheme would still be illegal."
Then comes the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) which involves $500 million that was funneled
in such a way that the Supreme Court had recently said was illegal.
Cutting a big check, sending money to various places, then funneling it all back to the
place it was initially determined to go after hopping the money over a million hurdles.
Trump's team has rightfully filed an FEC complaint to investigate the matters with
the $500 million.
The Committee to Defend the President has filed an FEC complaint against Hillary Clinton's
campaign, Democratic National Committee (DNC), Democratic state parties and Democratic mega-donors.
As Fox News reported, we documented the Democratic establishment "using state chapters as straw
men to circumvent campaign donation limits, and laundering the money back to her campaign."
The 101-page complaint focused on the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) — the $500 million joint
fundraising committee between the Clinton campaign, DNC and dozens of state parties
— which did exactly that the Supreme Court declared would still be illegal.
It's reported that HVF was taking, or asking for, significant six-figure donations from
well-known entities such as clothing companies and celebrities like Seth MacFarlane.
If they were given a donation, then the money was taken through different parties, and it
seems like the cash eventually made it back to Clinton's hands.
The smaller number we're working within this is about $84 million, and that could
make it the most massive campaign scandal involving finance in American history.
Backer continues his report: "Here's what we know.
Campaign finance law is incredibly complex and infamous for its lack of clarity.
As I've explained before, its complexity is a feature, not a bug.
Major political players with the resources to hire the very few attorneys, who practice
campaign finance law benefit from the complexity that keeps others out.
Perhaps HVF's architects thought so too, and assumed that if no one understands what's
happening, no one would complain.
Here's what you can do, legally.
Per election, an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state
party committee, and (during the 2016 cycle) $33,400 to a national party's main account.
These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of
those contribution limits — it's legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit
for any one recipient.
And state parties can make unlimited transfers to their national party.
Here's what you can't do, which the Clinton machine appeared to do anyway.
As the Supreme Court made clear in McCutcheon v FEC, the JFC may not solicit or accept contributions
to circumvent base limits, through "earmarks" and "straw men" that are ultimately excessive
— there are five separate prohibitions here.
On top of that, six-figure donations either never actually passed through state party
accounts or were never actually under state party control, which adds false FEC reporting
by HVF, state parties, and the DNC to the laundry list.
Finally, as Donna Brazile and others admitted, the DNC placed the funds under the Clinton
campaign's direct control, a massive breach of campaign finance law that ties the conspiracy
together.
Democratic donors, knowing the funds would end up with Clinton's campaign, wrote six-figure
checks to influence the election — 100 times larger than allowed."
HVF had some shady business going on with significant donations that were mixed up in
false FEC reports by multiple entities.
Was money being reported as being sent to one place, but indeed appearing in another?
Was the cash being reportedly tossed in various locations to make it harder to track?
Did any of these transfers actually happen?
Or were they just paper entries to mask direct transfers to the DNC?
This sounds like something that everyday Americans only see in well thought out movies, but those
movies always seem to end with the perpetrator finally getting caught by an intelligent investigator,
who finally pieces that puzzle together and solves the crime unmasking someone no one
suspected.
Is Hillary Clinton guilty of crimes or is she just the name that will be thrown under
the bus by a much bigger force?
Is there more to this than just the money being pushed around in ways that the Supreme
Court might find illegal?
If anyone goes down for this, that won't be the end of it.
Under every major crime, there are tons of little mysterious odds and ends, but there
could also be a more prominent king of the hill.
Is Hillary the king of the mountain in this investigation or is there someone above her
calling the shots?
what do you think about this?
Please share this news and scroll down to Comment below and don't forget to subscribe
Top Stories Today.
-------------------------------------------
BREAKING!! HE JUST DID IT… Hillary BUSTED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY! - Duration: 7:10.
BREAKING!!
HE JUST DID IT…
Hillary BUSTED in LARGEST SCANDAL In US HISTORY!
Dan Backer just pieced together an epic takedown of Hillary Clinton that's based on FEC reports,
memos by Clinton's campaign manager, and public statements from people like Donna Brazile
and many others who chose to speak out openly.
Could this information be the final stake in the heart of Hillary Clinton's alleged
crimes?
Let's analyze the information and see where it takes us.
The information dates back to 2014 when Shaun McCutcheon won favor from the Supreme Court.
As reported by Investors: "In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled in favor
of my client, Alabama engineer Shaun McCutcheon, in his challenge to the Federal Election Commission's
(FEC) outdated "aggregate limits," which effectively limited how many candidates any
one donor could support.
Anti-speech liberals railed against McCutcheon's win, arguing it would create supersized "Joint
Fundraising Committees" (JFCs).
In court, they claimed these JFCs would allow a single donor to cut a multimillion-dollar
check, and the JFC would then route funds through dozens of participating state parties,
who would then funnel it back to the final recipient.
Democracy 21 President Fred Wertheimer claimed the Supreme Court's McCutcheon v. FEC ruling
would lead to "the system of legalized bribery recreated that existed prior to Watergate."
The Supreme Court, in ruling for us, flatly stated such a scheme would still be illegal."Then
comes the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) which involves $500 million that was funneled in
such a way that the Supreme Court had recently said was illegal.
Cutting a big check, sending money to various places, then funneling it all back to the
place it was initially determined to go after hopping the money over a million hurdles.
Trump's team has rightfully filed an FEC complaint to investigate the matters with
the $500 million.
The Committee to Defend the President has filed an FEC complaint against Hillary Clinton's
campaign, Democratic National Committee (DNC), Democratic state parties and Democratic mega-donors.
As Fox News reported, we documented the Democratic establishment "us[ing] state chapters as
straw men to circumvent campaign donation limits and launder(ing) the money back to
her campaign."
The 101-page complaint focused on the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) — the $500 million joint
fundraising committee between the Clinton campaign, DNC, and dozens of state parties
— which did exactly that the Supreme Court declared would still be illegal.
It's reported that HVF was taking, or asking for, significant six-figure donations from
well-known entities such as clothing companies and celebrities like Seth MacFarlane.
If they were given a donation, then the money was taken through different parties, and it
seems like the cash eventually made it back to Clinton's hands.
The smaller number we're working within this is about $84 million, and that could
make it the most massive campaign scandal involving finance in American history.
Backer continues his report: "Here's what we know.
Campaign finance law is incredibly complex and infamous for its lack of clarity.
As I've explained before, its complexity is a feature, not a bug.
Major political players with the resources to hire the very few attorneys who practice
campaign finance law benefit from the complexity that keeps others out.
Perhaps HVF's architects thought so too, and assumed that if no one understands what's
happening, no one would complain.
Here's what you can do, legally.
Per election, an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state
party committee, and (during the 2016 cycle) $33,400 to a national party's main account.
These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of
those contribution limits — it's legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit
for any one recipient.
And state parties can make unlimited transfers to their national party.
Here's what you can't do, which the Clinton machine appeared to do anyway.
As the Supreme Court made clear in McCutcheon v. FEC, the JFC may not solicit or accept
contributions to circumvent base limits, through "earmarks" and "straw men" that are
ultimately excessive — there are five separate prohibitions here.
On top of that, six-figure donations either never actually passed through state party
accounts or were never actually under state party control, which adds false FEC reporting
by HVF, state parties, and the DNC to the laundry list.
Finally, as Donna Brazile and others admitted, the DNC placed the funds under the Clinton
campaign's direct control, a massive breach of campaign finance law that ties the conspiracy
together.
Democratic donors, knowing the funds would end up with Clinton's campaign, wrote six-figure
checks to influence the election — 100 times larger than allowed."
HVF had some shady business going on with significant donations that were mixed up in
false FEC reports by multiple entities.
Was money being reported as being sent to one place, but indeed appearing in another?
Was the cash being reportedly tossed in various locations to make it harder to track?
HVF bundled these megagifts and, on a single day, reported transferring money to all participating
state parties, some of which would then show up on FEC reports filed by the DNC as transferring
the exact same dollar amount on the exact same day to the DNC.
Yet not all the state parties reported either receiving or transferring those sums.
Did any of these transfers actually happen?
Or were they just paper entries to mask direct transfers to the DNC?
This sounds like something that everyday Americans only see in well thought out movies, but those
movies always seem to end with the perpetrator finally getting caught by an intelligent investigator
who finally pieces that puzzle together and solves the crime unmasking someone no one
suspected.
Is Hillary Clinton guilty of crimes or is she just the name that will be thrown under
the bus by a much bigger force?
Is there more to this than just the money being pushed around in ways that the Supreme
Court might find illegal?
If anyone goes down for this, that won't be the end of it.
Under every major crime, there are tons of little mysterious odds and ends, but there
could also be a more prominent king of the hill.
Is Hillary the king of the mountain in this investigation or is there someone above her
calling the shots?
-------------------------------------------
What If The United States Invaded China? - Duration: 3:39.
US Chinese relations have always been somewhat complicated.
Both countries rely on one another economically, but both countries also aknowledge that the
other could be a potential adversary.
But what if that delicate relationship suddenly became strained?
Today, Life's biggest questions asks, what if The united states Invaded China?
Hello and welcome back to LBQ, I'm your host, charlotte dobre.
As always make sure you hit that thumbs up and subscribe and let us know in the comments
below what topics you would like to see next.
Over the last few years, China's military is becoming more technologically advanced,
and it doesn't have obligations to the rest of the world the way America does.
China has nuclear capabilities, satellite technology and military forces on the ground,
air and sea.
China is the world's runner up for military spending, after the united states.
According to Abraham Denmark, senior vice president for political and security affairs
at the natural bureau for Asian research, a war between the US and China would be disastrous
for both sides.
So in order To invade china, the US would have to have a very good reason.
Perhaps If china got into a conflict with one of the united states' allies, like japan
or south korea, and the united states would be forced to intervene to defend those countries.
But, If the United States invaded China, without a good enough reason, that would make them
the aggressor, and effectively a war criminal.
And being a war criminal does not put you in the best position when it comes to needing
allies.
The ability to win the war will depend on the political climate at the time, and which
countries would back up the US and which would back up China.
If the United States invaded china, it would need to use its current allies that surround
china to serve as bases and launch points.
And having those allies really close to china poses a problem.
If the US wanted to strike china with a nuclear missile from the mainland, that missile has
to fly through the airspace of the surrounding countries.
In addition the fallout from that missile would affect all of the surrounding countries.
China has the geographical advantage.
In the event that the united states invades china, China could use nuclear weapons to
strategically take out all of the bases that the US requires.
It could destroy bases, like the Port of Yokosuka, or the Kadena Air base, and effectively stop
the war in its tracks.
If this happens, It would be extremely difficult for the US military to continue an operation.
Its aircraft need bases to refuel.
America would have to transport its supplies all the way from mainland America, or from
Australia.
Not to mention, what if India, North Korea or Russia came to chinas defence?
Russia could attack the united states from Alaska, Canada would have to then take a side.
If they side with America, its in the middle of a conflict, if it sides with china, a land
route opens up for Russian forces.
Either way, Canada would have to get involved, and All of a sudden, an American invasion
of china becomes a full fledged world war.
A war that the united states may very well lose.
Yes, the united states has the best military the world has ever seen, but you don't always
need the best military to win a war.
Many historians will say that the first rule of military strategy is to never get involved
in a land war in asia.
An invasion of china would be a bloodbath, especially for chinese civillians and US troops.
Millions would die initially, then after the first waves of troups died off, the US would
have to send more troups into the blood bath.
It would go on until both countries were so badly wounded, militarily, politically and
economically that they would be forced to stop.
American influence in asia would surely be strained following a war with china, especially
if they had been the aggressor.
It might never have the same influence in the east again.
What do you think would happen if the US invaded China?
Let us know in the comments below.
If you liked that video, you should also check out, what if the united states invaded England,
or what if the united states invaded Canada, clickable on the screen right now.
For now, I'm charlotte dobre, and you've been watching lifes biggest questions.
Don't forget to click the bell so you never miss an upload.
-------------------------------------------
What should the US do if China continues to defy sanctions? - Duration: 4:26.
For more infomation >> What should the US do if China continues to defy sanctions? - Duration: 4:26. -------------------------------------------
President Trump says Russia probe puts US in bad light - Duration: 4:09.
For more infomation >> President Trump says Russia probe puts US in bad light - Duration: 4:09. -------------------------------------------
Which state will be next to legalize marijuana in 2018? - Duration: 3:33.
For more infomation >> Which state will be next to legalize marijuana in 2018? - Duration: 3:33. -------------------------------------------
Barring Late Legal Twist, U.S. Military To Accept Transgender Recruits - Duration: 3:26.
Transgender people will be allowed to enlist in the US Armed Forces starting
on Monday as ordered by federal courts unless President Donald Trump's
administration seeks last-minute Supreme Court intervention to try to enforce his
blocked transgender ban two federal appeals courts one in
Washington and one in Virginia last week rejected the administration's request to
put on hold orders by lower court judges requiring the military to begin
accepting transgender recruits on January 1st
Justice Department spokeswoman Lauren Ayer Sam said on Friday there was no
update on whether the administration would file an emergency application at
the Supreme Court
lawyers representing currently serving transgender service members and aspiring
recruits said they had expected the administration to appeal those rulings
to the conservative majority Supreme Court but were hoping that would not
happen it definitely seems like they aren't
going to the Supreme Court but until we say a Happy New Year on Sunday night I'm
not taking anything for granted said joshua bloch a lawyer with the
American Civil Liberties Union in a move that appealed to his hardline
conservative supporters Trump announced in July that he would prohibit
transgender people from serving in the military reversing Democratic former
President Barack Obama's policy of accepting them Trump said on Twitter at
the time that the military cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical
costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail
for federal judges in Baltimore Washington DC Seattle and Riverside
California have issued rulings blocking Trump's ban while legal challenges to
the Republican president's policy precede the judges said the ban would
likely violate the right under the US Constitution to equal protection under
the law if the administration does not seek
Supreme Court suspension of the lower court injunctions openly transgender
individuals would be able to join the Armed Forces for the first time subject
to certain medical standards set forth by the Pentagon
there has been a tremendous amount of care thought and planning that has gone
into the policy that is set to go into effect on January 1st allowing
transgender people to enlist said Jennifer Levi's a lawyer with gay
lesbian and transgender advocacy group glad both GLAAD in the ACLU represent
plaintiffs in the lawsuits filed against the administration the administration
has argued that the military was not prepared to train the personnel needed
to properly assess transgender applicants the Obama administration had
set a deadline of July 1st of this year to begin accepting transgender recruits
but Trump's defense secretary James mattis postponed that date to January
1st which the president's ban then put off indefinitely
Trump also has taken other steps aimed at rolling back transgender rights in
October his administration said that a federal law banning gender-based
workplace discrimination does not protect transgender employees reversing
an Obama era position in February trump rescinded guidance issued by the obama
administration saying that public schools should allow transgender
students to use the restroom that corresponds to their gender identity
-------------------------------------------
Brutal Cold Temperatures Affect Parts of US, Canada - Duration: 0:58.
For more infomation >> Brutal Cold Temperatures Affect Parts of US, Canada - Duration: 0:58. -------------------------------------------
Political reporters size up U.S. Senate field - Duration: 6:15.
For more infomation >> Political reporters size up U.S. Senate field - Duration: 6:15. -------------------------------------------
American Isis fighter says 'war on Islam' has made US more vulnerable to attack in video message t - Duration: 4:19.
American isis fighter says we're on islam has made us more vulnerable to attack in video message to donald trump
Isis has claimed donald trump s war against islam is making the u.s.
more vulnerable to terror attacks while calling for further atrocities in a propaganda video released on wednesday and
African-american isis fighter using the war name abu salem raqi delivered a message to the president
You entered into the white house on the back of your crusader rhetoric which the fake media has pressured you to tone down
He said your feelings and hatred towards islam has already been revealed you are now witnessing your fake victory
your
war against islam has only made your homeland more vulnerable and your society is cracking into chaos
the american isis fighter whose true identity was not immediately known
was shown attaching a prosthetic leg and walking on crutches amid the ruins of buildings that appear to have been hit by airstrikes
wearing battle fatigues and carrying a pistol he repeated calls for isis supporters to rise and strike the kuffar
disbelievers and claimed the isis flag would be raised over the white house
the propaganda message suggested that rising island phobia and terror attacks in the us could help drive
supporters to isis s cause with the fighter saying
take advantage of the fact you can easily
Obtain a rifle or a pistol in america and spray the kafar with bullets so that their fear of muslims
rises and they continue to reveal their hatred towards islam for the ummah community to rise
isis has continually sought to exploit political tensions across the west to fuel its narrative of the holy war between its supporters and anyone including
muslims who oppose its brutal interpretation of sharia law the group s message to mr
trump came as activists told the independent american muslims were more vulnerable to a llama phobia under mr
Trump as president even in the wake of the nine to eleven attacks it has not just americans muslims who feel anxious
said, abraham hooper a founder of the council on american-islamic relations
We have seen white supremacists emboldened under trump
experts have warned of the danger of reciprocal radicalization where islamists and far-right extremists feed off each other to boost their own popularity
The president has been heavily
criticized for what create labeled a muslim ban on travel from selected countries as well as his whiter
remarks on islam an alleged failure to confront white supremacism
isis s latest video released by its main propaganda channels
incorporated footage of the aftermath of terror attacks including those in las vegas in orlando which were both claimed by the group
isis also claimed responsibility for a vehicle attack that killed eight people in manhattan on halloween but remained silent over a failed suicide
bombing in new york s subway system earlier this month
investigators said the suspect a kadala had been radicalized by materials including isis propaganda from
2014 onwards and had watched a video instructing supporters unable to travel to the group as territories to carry out attacks at home
shortly before the blast on the 11th of december he posted a statement on facebook
reading trump you failed to protect your nation as well as a declaration that the attack was carried out in the name of isis as
the terrorist group s self declared state in syria and iraq has dwindled it has been increasing its calls for attacks around the world
issuing detailed guidance on how to obtain firearms make bombs or used knives and vehicles to inflict mass casualties
another propaganda video released by isis s affiliate in somalia on christmas day incited attacks on new year s eve
celebrations christmas markets bars and the pope it also featured an english-speaking
isis militant who called on the brothers who live among the kuffar to commit atrocities
Until the group s black banner rises from washington to moscow from europe to china
British security services have warned that the risk of isis inspired terror attacks continues to grow and evolve despite the group as huge
territorial losses with a battle of ideas far from one
military officials say the group s remaining fighters are regrouping in the desert border between syria and iraq parts of afghanistan
egypt and libya on
wednesday us central command said there had been a series of raids targeting cave networks used by isis militants
In syria s hamid desert
-------------------------------------------
The Entire History of the US in ONE minute!!! - Duration: 1:16.
The French and Indian War it was called the Seven Years War but it was actually nine
years the British won
now the British are broke so they tax the colonists and
the colonists didn't like that and then they went to war in the Revolutionary
War the colonists won which
George Washington was the first president and
he had a cabinet and Jefferson and Hamiliton were in it there was conflict listen to Humiliation the musical-
In 1803 Thomas Jefferson made the Louisiana Purchase
because a manifest destiny and America's desire and God given right to move westward
Andrew Jackson was president and he hated Native Americans and there was the trail of tears
and tension was rising about the issue of slavery so the Missouri Compromise-
secede from the Union cause they wanted to keep slavery so they went to
war Abraham Lincoln was the president and the north won
and then the black codes started and it was horrible
Great Depression but you know about that
attacked Pearl Harbor and then we went to World War two
If you're watching this video I'm sorry this was on merely to distract you right now I have agents
going back in time to change every important person into a beanie baby. George
Washington beanie baby Dwight D Eisenhower a beanie baby
Fleetwood Mac beanie babies
why am I doing this?
I have a lot of stock in beanie babies
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét