Thứ Bảy, 2 tháng 12, 2017

Auto news on Youtube Dec 2 2017

BILL & HILLARY CLINTON �ENGAGE IN SEX WITH MINORS� � EX US DEPARTMENT OF STATE OFFICIAL

BY ARJUN WALIANOVEMBER

Steve Pieczenik is a former United States Department of State official and a Harvard

trained psychiatrist with a doctorate in international relations from the Massachusetts Institute

of Technology (MIT).

You can read his full bio here.

His roles within US politics were many, being the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under

Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vacne and James Baker and also serving the presidential administrations

of Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Regan and George H.W. Bush as deputy assistant secretary.

Now, if you�ve done research into US politics, being associated with names like Kissinger

and Bush automatically raise an eyebrow.

What�s even more concerning to some is that he was a member of the Council on Foreign

Relations, a group many consider to be �wicked� in the guise of good deeds, however, he was

removed from the membership as early as October 2012, the same time he started to �blow

the whistle,� so to speak.

Is he perhaps on the side of many who are coming clean about what the elite have been

up to?

Part of the �earth alliance� as some call it?

�We know that both of them have been a major part and participant of what�s called The

Lolita Express, which is a plane owned by Mr. Jeff Epstein, a wealthy multi-millionaire

who flies down to the Bahamas and allows Bill Clinton and Hillary to engage in sex with

minors, that is called Pedophilia.�

The Republican presumptive nominee has apparently got involved on this too.

Trump�s does have ties to Epstein.

Trumps ties to Sex Slave Island have been chronicled by The Daily Wire here.

Jeffrey Epstein

Epstein is an American financier and sex offender, with close ties to the Clinton�s.

As mentioned above, the Clinton�s were a frequent flyer on his jet, taking dozens of

trips aboard the �Lolita Express.�

Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on the registered sex offender�s

infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking

at least 26 trips aboard the �Lolita Express.�

Flight logs show the number is more than double that, and trips between 2001 and 2003 included

trips around the world with Epstein and fellow passengers identified on manifests by their

initials or first names, including �Tatiana.� The jet has it�s nickname as is because

it was reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young girls.

This Is Nothing New

Ted Gunderson, former FBI special agent and head of their L.A. office, worked to uncover

and expose this type of thing.

A simple youtube search of his name will show you what exactly he spent his last years researching

Here�s one of his last lectures.

He is one of several dozen who have investigated this topic and found some disturbing facts.

Former U.S. representative Cynthia McKinney also knew about pedophilia within the government

in 2005.

She grilled Donald Rumsfeld on DynCorp�s child trafficking business of selling women

and children in the video below.

The video below is of FBI whistle blower Sibel Edmonds appearing on RT news.

She is a former FBI translator and founder of the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition

(NSWBC).

She gained a lot of attention in 2002 after she accused a colleague of covering up illicit

activity involving Turkish nationals, which included serious security breaches and cover-ups

alluding to intelligence that was deliberately suppressed.

In this video, at approximately the 20 minute mark, she shares some of her knowledge regarding

these incidents.

The evidence is so large regarding this topic that it would require multiple books to cover.

This article is simply providing a tidbit of information about what�s known in these

circles.

Podesta, Comet Pizza & PEDOS (Warning Graphic)

Below is a disturbing video put together by the underground resistance network taking

the topic a little deeper than what�s already been exposed in the mainstream.

Why is This Important to Know About?

These are the people whom we call our leaders.

With all of these leaks, not just on this topic, but on others, it�s clear that modern

day politics is a cesspool of corruption.

This election was a great opportunity to witness even more evidence that our political system

is far from a democracy.

This is exactly why revelations like this are important to bring to light.

We don�t know where to go, if we don�t know where we are truly at.

You can read more about why this is important in the article below, which goes more in-depth.

For more infomation >> BILL & HILLARY CLINTON "ENGAGE IN SEX WITH MINORS" – EX US DEPAR - Duration: 5:18.

-------------------------------------------

The US Navy and Their Hilariously Inept Search for Dorothy and Her Friends - Duration: 9:04.

While the Ancient Greeks had their celebrated Sacred Band of Thebes, a legendarily successful

fighting force made up of all male lovers, in more modern times the various branches

of the United States military have not been so accepting of such individuals, which brings

us to the topic of today- that time in the 1980s when the Naval Intelligence Service

invested significant resources into trying to locate a mysterious woman identified only

as "Dorothy" who seemed to have links to countless gay seamen.

The plan was to find her and then "convince" her to finger these individuals so the military

could give them the boot.

This story all starts with a naval crack down to try to get rid of any gay personnel in

the early 1980s.

One Mel Dahl, who was completely open about the fact that he was gay when he was questioned

about it upon enlisting in 1980, was kicked out in 1981 after being interviewed for a

security clearance upgrade and once again letting the Navy know he was gay.

This time they weren't so accepting of that information.

During the course of Dahl's subsequent legal battle with the Navy over his discharge, he

noted to the news media that there were quite a lot of gay men at the Great Lakes base he

had been stationed at.

This information did not go over well with the military brass who launched a full scale

investigation of the base to try to identify these individuals.

Specifically, as reported in Conduct Unbecoming: Gays and Lesbians in the U.S. Military, by

Randy Shilts, the U.S. Navy spent a considerable amount of money sending investigators to gay

bars in the Chicago area to try to discover these gay sailors.

During these trips, investigators noticed that many gay men in the area identified themselves

as "friends of Dorothy".

The Intelligence Service deduced that "Dorothy" must be a woman that functioned as a sort

of information hub that gay men could use to find other gay men.

If they could only find her, they figured they could convince her to talk, perhaps outing

many of the gay navy personnel in the process, who in turn, with a little pressure, could

no doubt out many others.

The key was simply to find Dorothy.

Thus, the NIS tasked investigators with returning to the same gay bars to clandestinely ask

questions about this mysterious woman.

Unfortunately for them, they failed at finding Dorothy, wasting an amazing amount of taxpayer

money paying investigators to pose as gay men, drinking and breaking it down in 1980s

era gay bars.

This said, other investigations they conducted seem not to have been so fruitless, with the

Defense Department noting that, in total, 1,976 members of the various branches of the

U.S. military were kicked out for being gay in 1981 alone; a reported 55% of these individuals

were ousted from the Navy- all at a massive cost to U.S. taxpayers.

As noted by one discharged gay Air Force captain interviewed by Shilts, it cost the Air Force

somewhere in the range of four to five million dollars to train him when factoring in the

exceptionally high cost of aircraft time in that training.

(As an interesting aside, for a time it was perceived that the military was unfairly targeting

gay men, while not cracking down nearly so hard on lesbians in their ranks.

As a result, in 1990 Vice Admiral Joseph S. Donnell issued a memo urging his subordinates

to root out lesbians in the Navy, not just gay men.

As to how lesbians were to be identified, he wrote, "Experience has shown that the

stereotypical female homosexual in the Navy is hard-working, career-oriented, willing

to put in long hours on the job and among the command's top professionals…"

We can't make this stuff up.)

In any event, at this point you might be wondering who exactly was this "Tokyo Rose" of the

gay community and how did she have so many gay friends?

As it turns out, she was none other than Dorothy Gale of The Wizard of Oz…

You see, for over a half century now the phrase "Friend of Dorothy" has been considered

a euphemism for "gay".

The phrase, sometimes simply abbreviated to FOD, is believed to have first popped up sometime

in the 1940s as a way for gay men to identify themselves as such to others without outright

saying it.

As you can imagine, in areas where the laws of the land and/or the general populace were

strongly against said individuals, being able to say "I'm a friend of Dorothy" instead

of "I'm gay" was a major boon.

After all, if said individual was speaking to someone who was also gay, the other person

would probably know exactly what they were saying.

If not, likely they'd think the individual knew some woman named Dorothy who they mistakenly

thought was a mutual acquaintance.

While there are alternate speculative theories as to the origin of the phrase, based on the

evidence at hand, as mentioned, it is generally thought to have been inspired by the popular

1939 film The Wizard of Oz and/or the 1909 book it is based on.

It is also noted that Judy Garland herself ultimately became exceptionally popular among

the gay community throughout her adulthood, while the film is popular for its message

of inclusivity in spite of differences.

To quote the Gay Times on the matter:

Dorothy's three companions on her trip to Oz have long been read as gay, and for good

reason.

The Tin Man, the Scarecrow, and the Cowardly Lion are misfits who do not conform to their

perceived 'roles'.

The Scarecrow is unable to frighten anything – crow or otherwise; the Tin Man constantly

needs lubing up; and the Cowardly Lion seems to prefer mincing to roaring.

This ostracisation is familiar to many gay guys – who are often accused of being less

masculine than straight guys.

On that note, Dorothy happily accepts the somewhat effeminate "Cowardly Lion" who

eventually identifies as a "friend of Dorothy," and earlier on states, "I'm afraid there's

no denyin', I'm just a dandy lion," with "dandy" generally referring to an

often effeminate man seen as overly preoccupied with fashion.

(For more on this, see Why Did Yankee Doodle Stick a Feather in His Cap and Call It Macaroni?)

Books continuing the story also include similar themes, characters and moments that likewise

resonate with the LGBT communities.

Most famous of all is a quote from the book, The Road to Oz, in which Dorothy responds

to a character saying she has "queer friends" by saying:

The queerness doesn't matter, so long as they're friends.

Of course, the word "queer" here is roughly understood to be a synonym for "odd" or

"unusual", but, as with so many other bits of the books that are not actually thought

to have been references to homosexuality, it nonetheless struck a chord among gay fans

who responded well to the idea of accepting someone regardless of how different others

found them- it was their character that was the only thing that was important.

A mere decade after The Wizard of Oz first made its debut on the big screen, "Friend

of Dorothy" had become one of the most popular euphemisms used by gay people to refer to

themselves- a fact the rest of the world were largely oblivious to, allowing gay people

to discretely identify themselves as such at a time when doing so may have been illegal

where they lived and/or potentially dangerous.

Unsurprisingly given changing attitudes and laws today, the phrase "Friend of Dorothy"

isn't nearly as widely known among those of the youthful persuasion in the LGBT communities,

and many with a few more years under their belts have less need to use the phrase than

they once did, so it is dying out somewhat.

However, one place you'll still occasionally hear it is aboard cruise ships, where an announcement

like "Friends of Dorothy are meeting in the lounge on Deck 7 at 8 pm" is sometimes

made.

This is similar to how members of Alcoholic Anonymous have long announced meetings aboard

cruise ships as a meeting of "Friends of Bill W".

This refers to the founder of Alcoholic Anonymous, William "Bill" Willson.

Similar to the "Friends of Dorothy" announcements, the idea is to provide a way to announce such

meetings without outing those

who attend.

For more infomation >> The US Navy and Their Hilariously Inept Search for Dorothy and Her Friends - Duration: 9:04.

-------------------------------------------

Cars You're Not Allowed To Buy In The United States - Duration: 3:07.

America may be the land of the free, but when it comes to automobiles, it turns out there

are some limits to just how much freedom you have.

Yes, it may sound crazy, but thanks to pesky little things like safety regulations and

import fees, there are some cars you just can't buy in the United States.

Holden Ute SS-V

If you want to take a ride in the Holden Ute SS-V, you'll have to head to the outback,

because the Australian light truck isn't available in the United States.

And you can blame chickens for that.

See, way back in 1963, the United States got angry at France and Germany for imposing tariffs

on chickens imported from America.

In retaliation they created what's known as the "Chicken Tax," which is a whopping 25

percent tax on light trucks imported to the U.S.

As a result, the Holden Ute SS-V is just too cost prohibitive for the manufacturer to send

them to America.

Toyota Hilux

Once upon a time, you could get a Toyota Hilux in America.

But by 1995, it had been replaced domestically with the Tacoma.

Which is too bad, because the Hilux is legendary for its ability to soak up punishment and

keep on running, as vehicles regularly clock over 300,000 miles without trouble.

Nowadays, though, if you want a Hilux you'll have to travel overseas, because North America

is one of the places on Earth where you can't get one, along with India, Japan, and North

and South Korea.

Tata Nano

There is a very good reason why the Tata Nano isn't available in the USA—it's a death

trap.

Receiving zero stars in NCAP safety tests, the 2009 Nano was billed as "the world's cheapest

car," not a slogan that'll inspire a lot of confidence.

Intended to challenge popular two wheeled vehicles like scooters, the Nano was originally

priced at $2,500, but the terrible safety rating meant it sold poorly.

An upgraded version is regularly rumored to be on the verge of release in the USA, but

so far, Americans have been spared this rolling coffin.

The car does have at least one fan in the U.S., though.

"And it's $2,700!

It's Amazing!"

Lada Niva

First produced in 1977, the Lada Niva is a compact off-road vehicle halfway between a

Volkswagen Rabbit and a Land Rover.

One of Russia's best-selling export vehicles, the Niva continues to be manufactured and

sold almost everywhere, except, of course, in the United States.

As a result, the car has developed a bit of a cult following in America.

And hey, if it's good enough for Vladimir Putin, it's good enough for the American public,

right?

Especially if you're into skateboarding.

[Engine roar] "Woah!"

Toyota Century Royal

If you want to truly ride in luxury, the Toyota Century Royal is the car for you.

Or it would be, if anyone were allowed to buy them.

Unfortunately for the common folk of America, the Century Royal is a special edition reserved

only for the Japanese Imperial Household.

Only four Century Royals were produced, at an estimated cost of roughly a half million

dollars for the base model, and close to a million dollars each for vehicles upgraded

with special safety enhancements.

So in order to get one, all you need to do is be rich, move to Japan, and marry into

royalty.

Those boring old American cars don't seem quite so bad now, do they?

Thanks for watching!

Click the Grunge icon to subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Plus check out all this cool stuff we know you'll love, too!

For more infomation >> Cars You're Not Allowed To Buy In The United States - Duration: 3:07.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: U.S. SENATE PASSES MAJOR TAX REFORM – HERE'S HOW IT AFFECTS YOU - Duration: 5:24.

BREAKING: U.S. SENATE PASSES MAJOR TAX REFORM � HERE�S HOW IT AFFECTS YOU

arly Saturday morning, the United States Senate passed the most sweeping tax reform in decades,

which will bring a significant tax cut to both the working class and big business.

The vote was close � 51 to 49 � with only one Republican voting against the GOP-sponsored

bill.

Fox News reports on what the reform will mean for you.

The U.S. Senate voted just before 2 a.m. ET Saturday to pass a sweeping tax overhaul worth

roughly $1.4 trillion, putting the Trump White House a big step closer to its first major

legislative victory � and many Americans closer to a tax cut.

The vote was 51-49, with Republican Bob Corker of Tennessee the only member of the GOP to

side with the Democrats in opposition.

The bill is still not yet finalized.

Saturday�s vote means the Senate and House have passed similar tax reform plans, but

negotiators from both chambers will start meeting Monday to agree on a single piece

of legislation that both chambers must approve before it is sent to President Donald Trump

for his signature.Here�s how the latest legislation would affect you:

What deductions can I claim under the Senate bill that just passed?

The Senate bill does away with federal deductions for state and local income and sales taxes,

but allows deductions of up to $10,000 in local property taxes.

The legislation originally eliminated federal deduction for all state and local taxes, but

the property tax exemption was later added at the insistence of Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine,

who said she was �delighted� about the change.

What about personal deductions?

Like the House bill, the Senate bill nearly doubles the standard deduction level to $12,000

for individuals (up from $6,350) and $24,000 for couples (up from $12,700).Any other deductions

I could claim?

The Senate bill retains the current limit for the home mortgage interest deduction to

interest paid on the first $1 million of the loan.

(The House bill reduces the limit to $500,000 for new home purchases.)

The Senate version also preserves the deduction for medical expenses not covered by insurance

(the House bill does not), but ends deductions for moving expenses and tax preparation.

Why does the Senate bill allow deducting medical expenses not covered by insurance?

Because the Senate bill also repeals ObamaCare�s individual mandate, while the House bill does

not.

If ObamaCare�s mandate is repealed, thousands of people are expected to drop their health

insurance, raising the cost for those who decide to keep it.

And the personal exemption?The Senate and House bills both eliminate the $4,050 personal

tax exemption.

Will the tax brackets change at all?

The Senate bill keeps seven tax brackets, but reduces them to 10, 12, 22, 24, 32, 35

and 38.5 percent.

(The current brackets are 10, 15, 25, 28, 33, 35, and 39.6 percent.)

The House measure condenses seven brackets to four: 12, 25, 35 and 39.6 percent.

I own a small business.

What would this mean for me?

The Senate bill allows owners of so-called �pass-through� businesses (that is, businesses

that aren�t incorporated) to deduct 23 percent of their earnings, and then pay at their personal

income tax rate on the remainder.

This issue was a key concern of Sens. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Steve Daines, R-Mont.,

both of whom announced this week that they would support the bill.

What about corporate tax rates?

Like the House bill, the Senate bill cuts the current 35 percent rate to 20 percent,

but the Senate bill calls for a one-year delay in dropping the rate.

When will tax reform take effect?

President Trump and congressional Republicans have vowed to make tax reform law before the

end of the year.

If that happens, most of the provisions would come into force on Jan. 1.

Will tax reform affect my returns for this year?

The changes will not have any impact on your taxes for 2017, which are due to the IRS by

April 17, 2018 (you get an extra 48 hours to file because the traditional April 15 due

date falls on a Sunday).

So when will the differences in the bills be hashed out?

The House will vote on a motion to go to conference on the tax bills on Monday evening.

The Senate is expected to vote on a similar measure soon after.

Congress is scheduled to adjourn for its Christmas break on Dec. 15, but House Speaker Paul Ryan

has said he will keep the House in session beyond that date if necessary to get tax reform

passed.

For more infomation >> BREAKING: U.S. SENATE PASSES MAJOR TAX REFORM – HERE'S HOW IT AFFECTS YOU - Duration: 5:24.

-------------------------------------------

China's hypersonic ultimate DOOMSDAY weapon – and it could wipe out the US in ONE SHOT - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 3:30.

China's hypersonic 'ultimate DOOMSDAY weapon' – and it could wipe out the US in ONE SHOT

CHINA new hypersonic nuclear missile has been

branded the "ultimate doomsday weapon" amid warnings it could wipe out the US in

one shot.

Dongfeng-41 (DF-41) is the next generation of nuke being developed for the People's

Liberation Army – and it has been in development for 30 years.

Chinese scientists boast the weapon is capable of hypersonic speeds up to Mach 25.

And last week state media claimed China's new nuke can hit "anywhere" in the world.

Now experts have offered their chilling assessment of the 19,030mph weapon – branding it a

"doomsday" device.

DF-41 would give the Chinese military the power to destroy the US with just a single

missile, it has been warned.

Nuclear disarmament campaigner John Hallam described the missile as the "ultimate doomsday

weapon".

He called it a "whopper" that was comparable, if not bigger than, Russia's new nuke the

colossal nation-killer Satan 2.

China's military are alleged to have tested the nuclear weapon at least eight times since

2012.

The weapon is believed to carry 10 nuclear warheads – each of which can seek of targets

independently.

DF-41 is believed to be 33 tonnes and approximately 15 metres long – and can be mounted on a

truck, or launched from a silo.

"Just one of these missiles, with 10 warheads each of 100kt plus range, could essentially

destroy either the major cities or the significant military capacity of the US," Mr Hallam

told news.com.au.

He added: "It's a whopper, comparable to the biggest Russian missiles, which it

resembles, including the recently tested Sarmat (Satan 2)."

China's military is allegedly pushing to drop Beijing's longstanding "no fire use"

doctrine for nuclear weapons.

Propaganda produced by China claims the Dongfeng-41 will be one of the most powerful nuclear missiles

in the world.

And there are reports China may have tested the Dongfeng-41 just two days before US President

Donald Trump arrived for a one-on-one meeting with President Xi Jinping.

Xi has said he wants China to have the capacity to win any war as he pushes for further modernisation

of the People's Liberation Army.

Estimates place the Dongfeng-41's operational range between 7,500 and and 9,000 miles – putting

the US comfortably in range.

Relations have long been frosty between the US and China as the Communist giant continues

to expand its influence in Asia and the two clash over North Korea.

China unveiled new hypersonic warheads last month as the superpower showed off its new

state-of-the-art wind tunnel.

For more infomation >> China's hypersonic ultimate DOOMSDAY weapon – and it could wipe out the US in ONE SHOT - DAILY NEWS - Duration: 3:30.

-------------------------------------------

As U.S. Child Asthma Rates Soar, EPA Fights for Big Coal's Agenda - Duration: 10:52.

GREGORY WILPERT: It's the Real News Network and I'm Gregory Wilpert coming to you from

Quito, Ecuador.

More than 40% of Americans, that's over 125 million people, live in areas that fail to

meet national ambient air-quality standards, according to the American Lung Association's

report, State of the Air 2017.

Yet Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency, under the helm of climate denier Scott

Pruitt, is aiming to abolish the Obama-era Clean Power Plan.

The EPA held its only scheduled hearing on its proposal to repeal the plan in the heart

of coal country in Charleston, West Virginia this week.

While the coal lobby was front and center, so too were many local citizens and those

from environmental groups across the country speaking out on why the plan to curb emissions

from coal-power plants should not be repealed.

One such advocate who testified at the hearing is Mark Magaña, who is the founding president

and CEO of Green Latinos, a national coalition of environmental, natural resources and conservation

leaders.

We are happy to have him join us here today from Washington, D.C.

Thanks for being here, Mark.

MARK MAGAÑA: Thank you for the invitation to speak with you today.

GREGORY WILPERT: First of all, tell us why you and some of your colleagues from Green

Latinos took the time to travel to Charleston to testify at this hearing.

Why was it important for you to do this?

MARK MAGAÑA: Well, Green Latinos is a national network of Latino environmental and conservation

advocates.

And for us, the Clean Power Plan represented a commonsense environmental and economic opportunity

to protect our environment for us and for our future generations by limiting the carbon

pollution coming from existing coal-fire power plants.

This was a very commonsense way to make sure that our air that we breathe is healthier,

that the asthma rates of our children is reduced.

This is vital for our livelihoods, for our economic future.

And we came together from across the country to make sure that the EPA understood that

their efforts to repeal the Clean Power Plan were not acceptable.

And they want to do this on behalf of big oil and big coal, and we want to fight on

behalf of people and the future generations.

GREGORY WILPERT: From what I understand, there were almost 300 people testifying.

Tell us a little bit about the divide amongst them including, I understand, within West

Virginians who were there.

MARK MAGAÑA: Well, it was very interesting 'cause when we were there, from my point of

view from what I saw, it was very heavily stacked for people that wanted to fight against

the repeal of the Clean Power Plan.

And from the analysis I saw, it was over 80% of the people who testified were opposed to

the repeal of the Clean Power Plan.

Even former coal miners were represented there opposing the repeal of the Clean Power Plan,

talking about their families and friends and the sicknesses in their neighborhoods and

the health disparities that they see in West Virginia, in the heart of coal mining country

and that they want to make sure the Clean Power Plan exists, is maintained and is even

strengthened so that their families are protected.

The people of West Virginia were divided but in the coal mining community there were many

coal miners that were fighting to maintain the Clean Power Plan.

GREGORY WILPERT: Well, of course, one of the people who was in favor of repealing it is

Scott Pruitt, and he says that the Clean Power Plan should be repealed because it "exceeds

the EPA's statutory authority."

Is he merely using legalese to justify why emissions from coal power plants should not

come under the EPA's jurisdiction and somehow be outside the Clean Air Act?

What do you think?

What's going on?

MARK MAGAÑA: Several courts have determined that it's within their jurisdiction and their

rightful purpose under law to protect the air quality of Americans from the existing

coal-fire power plants.

Him coming in and unilaterally saying it was beyond their jurisdiction doesn't follow what

the courts have said.

He's just using that as a way to follow their agenda, their corporate industrial agenda,

to provide more giveaways for the oil and gas industry, and at the cost of our health.

And that's unacceptable.

GREGORY WILPERT: And Latinos are particularly vulnerable to air pollution because like African

Americans, they are more likely to live in communities that have high levels of air pollution.

In fact, 66% of Hispanics live in such areas, according to some studies.

Talk about this affects the adults and children of these communities.

MARK MAGAÑA: That's true, what you said, was the majority of Americans live in counties

that have higher than average, unacceptable levels of air pollution.

And that leads to higher levels of disease, cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease.

And it really specifically hits our children and their young lungs.

When they breathe and they breathe this air with contaminants in it, it's much more susceptible

for them to become someone who's asthmatic and that's something that lasts for the rest

of their life.

They have to carry around inhalers.

But the problem we have is that it's not a simple solution.

Latino children are 40% more likely to die from asthma-related deaths.

I can't imagine, being a father of two young children, watching my child gasping for air

while I rush him or her to the hospital and find them dying because I wasn't able to provide

them, in the environment, to breathe the clean air so that they wouldn't have asthma.

That's unacceptable for our current generation of children.

And you find areas of our country, like the Bronx in New York where it's a higher level.

30, 40% of children have asthma and that's just not a way that we can live.

We need to have our energy systems work with us, not us be forced to adapt to our energy

systems.

GREGORY WILPERT: And in reaction to this problem, is there a growing Latino movement in the

US, particularly from communities that are impacted by the effects of poor air quality

and pollution?

MARK MAGAÑA: There is.

In a more formal sense, there's a growing environmental movement in the Latino community.

But in a very organic sense, the Latino community has been what I like to call cultural conservationists,

meaning we historically have lived a life of conservation, reuse, repurpose, recycle

everything that we have in a way that mirrors or exceeds the way most environmentalists

will live.

We learn from what I like to call from the back of a chancla, which is a slipper, from

our grandparent or our mother, not to waste.

That you eat everything off your plate.

That if you're cold, you put on a sweater, you don't put on the heat.

If you're warm, you put wet towel on your neck, you don't put on the air conditioning.

You close the door.

You turn off the lights.

You take shorter showers.

You respect the air.

You respect the water.

You live in a symbiosis with nature and this is something that a lot of Latinos, they live

by these ways, these cultural ways, these cultural norms that we have.

But if you ask these same people that live this way, "Are you an environmentalist?"

Their natural instinct is to say no, and then when you tell them, "Well, these are the things

that environmentalists do," then they realize, "Yes, I am."

And the shock to them is that not everyone respects the environment, that there are people

who would make the choice to ruin our water and our land and our air.

And that is shocking.

And the recognition that this is a policy issue that we can't just sit back and assume

is going to be protected, that we need to fight for this, is one where Green Latinos

is activating more and more Latinos and bringing together Latinos that are already activated

to work together to be more effective on behalf of our communities, on behalf of the issue

overall.

GREGORY WILPERT: Well, turning to the Clean Power Plan again, how effective do you think

it would be, if it was fully implemented, in reducing air pollution for Latino and African

American communities and for non-Hispanic white communities that are living in areas

where there are high levels of pollution and that don't meet the national standard currently?

MARK MAGAÑA: Well, the Clean Power Plan, it was estimated that it was going to save

as many as 4,500 premature deaths by the year 2030.

That's a significant amount of deaths.

And these are school children.

These are families.

And I still believe that the Clean Power Plan will survive.

I still believe that we will bring it back.

I still believe that we'll be successful in our fight for climate change, so I hate to

use the past tense, but I do believe that efforts like the Clean Power Plan will succeed

and we will bring about a renaissance in the environment.

People of color, Latino communities, where we have been treated with inequitable placement

of coal-fire power plants, of recycling plants, of gas facilities, of chemical facilities.

And these limitations, whether it's a carbon tax, whether it's a Clean Power Plan will

have a positive effect on our communities.

And we will get them done.

GREGORY WILPERT: We'll leave it there for now.

I was joined by Mark Magaña, CEO of Green Latinos.

Thanks for being on our program today, Mark.

MARK MAGAÑA: Thank you very much for having me.

GREGORY WILPERT: And thank you for watching The Real News Network.

If you like our news and analysis, please don't forget to support us by donating to

The Real News this holiday season.

For more infomation >> As U.S. Child Asthma Rates Soar, EPA Fights for Big Coal's Agenda - Duration: 10:52.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. strategic assets arrive in S. Korea for first joint drill since N. Korea missile launch - Duration: 2:12.

South Korea and the United States will hold a joint Air Force drill next week involving

almost 230 aircraft.

The regular exercise is called Vigilant Ace, planned before North Korea's latest missile

launch.

But coming so soon after, it may involve a bigger show of force than ever before.

Our Oh Jung-hee has the details.

U.S. strategic assets are arriving in South Korea for an annual joint air force drill

called Vigilant Ace next week.

The airborne exercise is set to mobilize 12-thousand U.S. personnel and almost 230 aircraft.

Six F-22 Raptor stealth fighter jets are to be deployed starting Saturday,... and all

six jets will fly over South Korea simultaneously for the first time in the history of the joint

drill.

F-22 jets are equipped with full stealth capabilities,... meaning that they can infiltrate North Korean

airspace undetected and destroy key nuclear and missile facilities.

Twelve F-35B jets will also be deployed.

The presence of the F-22 Raptor and the F-35B fighters is expected to put maximum pressure

on North Korea... as both aircraft can reach Pyongyang in only ten minutes if they depart

from Osan Air Base, located 64 km south of Seoul,... and in 20 minutes from Gunsan Air

Base in Jeollabuk-do Province.

In addition to these two, six F-35A stealth fighter jets also arrived in South Korea last

week... and B-1B bombers are expected to take part in the drill as well.

South Korea's defense ministry says... the joint exercise will focus on striking facilities

and moving targets in North Korea... as well as countering possible North Korean invasions

by sea and air.

This year's Vigilant Ace comes in less than a week after Pyongyang launched an ICBM,...

so it's expected to be carried out amid high tensions on the peninsula.

Seoul also plans to coordinate with Washington to have U.S. strategic assets deployed on

a rotational basis... until the end of the 2018 PyeongChang Winter Olympics.

Oh Jung-hee, Arirang News.

For more infomation >> U.S. strategic assets arrive in S. Korea for first joint drill since N. Korea missile launch - Duration: 2:12.

-------------------------------------------

N. Korea seeking U.S. recognition as nuclear weapons state: Russian officials - Duration: 0:39.

Our top story this afternoon...

North Korea is pushing the United States to recognize it as a nuclear weapons state.

Russian delegates who recently visited Pyongyang say North Korea is ready to hold direct talks

with Washington, but only on the condition that it recognize the regime as a nuclear

power.

The Russians said they were also told that the North successfully launched its new Hwasong-15

ICBM on Wednesday,... and that the country had already achieved its goal of becoming

a nuclear weapons state.

The bilateral meeting took place on Thursday,.. a day after the launch.

For more infomation >> N. Korea seeking U.S. recognition as nuclear weapons state: Russian officials - Duration: 0:39.

-------------------------------------------

US OKs Sale of Guided-Missile Bombs to Singapore - Duration: 0:58.

For more infomation >> US OKs Sale of Guided-Missile Bombs to Singapore - Duration: 0:58.

-------------------------------------------

Episode 1122 | Former U.S. Senator Fred Harris - Duration: 25:19.

FORMER US SENATOR FRED HARRIS, A LONG TIME RESIDENT OF

CORRALES, WAS OKLAHOMA'S US SENATOR FROM '64 TO '73.

APPOINTED BY PRESIDENT LYNDON JOHNSON TO THE NATIONAL

ADVISORY COMMISSION ON CIVIL DISORDERS, ALSO KNOWN AS THE

KERNER COMMISSION.

THE COMMISSION'S REPORT WHICH CAME OUT IN 1968, EXAMINED

CONDITIONS OF POVERTY AND RACE IN THE COUNTRY.

SENATOR HARRIS WILL SOON RELEASE A BOOK ON THE 50TH

ANNIVERSARY OF THE KERNER COMMISSION REPORT.

CORRESPONDENT RUSSELL CONTRERAS SAT DOWN WITH

SENATOR HARRIS TO TALK ABOUT HIS HISTORY IN POLITICS.

>> SENATOR FRED HARRIS, THANK YOU FOR JOINING US HERE.

TAKE ME BACK TO 1967.

WHAT WAS GOING ON IN THE COUNTRY IN OUR URBAN AREAS AND

HOW DID YOU RESPOND AS SENATOR.

>> WE HAD A RIOT IN THE BLACK SECTION OF LOS ANGELES, THE

YEAR BEFORE.

AND SOME PEOPLE SAID -- NO, IT WAS '65 AND SOME PEOPLE HAD

SAID IT WAS A KIND OF A ONE OFF INCIDENT AND OTHERS SAID,

THIS IS A HARBINGER OF THINGS TO COME.

WELL, IT WAS THE LATTER.

IN SUMMER OF 1967 IN DETROIT AND NEWARK AND THEN ABOUT 20

SOMETHING OTHER CITIES AROUND THE COUNTRY, WE HAD JUST

EXPLOSIONS IN THE BLACK SECTIONS OF AMERICA'S CITIES.

I WAS A MEMBER OF THE SENATE, WITH ROBERT KENNEDY, THE

RIBICOFF COMMITTEE LOOKING INTO URBAN PROBLEMS AND

PROBLEMS OF RACISM AS WELL AS POVERTY.

AND, SO, I WENT THROUGH THE SENATE FLOOR AND INTRODUCED A

RESOLUTION TO CREATE A BLUE RIBBON CITIZENS COMMISSION TO

LOOK INTO THESE RIOTS, NOT JUST ONLY FROM THE LAW AND

ORDER STANDPOINT, BUT ALSO TRYING TO GET AT THE DEEPER

CAUSES OF WRETCHED POVERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITIES AND RACISM.

AND THE RESOLUTION CAME UP IN THE SUBCOMMITTEE I CHAIRED,

BUT THEN IT OCCURRED TO ME THAT LYNDON JOHNSON HIMSELF,

THE PRESIDENT, COULD DO THIS BY EXECUTIVE ORDER.

SO I GOT WORD TO HIM AND URGED HIM TO DO THAT AND THAT IS

WHAT EVENTUALLY HE DID, PRETTY MUCH USING SOME OF THE SAME

WORDS I HAD.

>> WHEN THE PRESIDENT ANNOUNCED THIS COMMISSION, HE

DID CALL YOU AND SAY HE WANTED YOU ON IT.

WHAT DID YOU DO?

>> KIND OF FUNNY.

I HAD -- THERE HAD BEEN AN ANNOUNCEMENT THAT THE

PRESIDENT WAS GOING TO HAVE A NATIONWIDE BROADCAST TO

APPOINT THIS BLUE RIBBON COMMISSION AND SO I HAD

BROUGHT A TELEVISION INTO OUR LIVING ROOM AND INVITED SOME

NEIGHBORS, FRIENDS OF MINE, TO COME OVER AND WATCH THE

PRESIDENT'S SPEECH.

AND ABOUT 10 MINUTES BEFORE HE WAS TO GO ON THE AIR, MY

YOUNGEST DAUGHTER, LAUREL, SHE WAS IN, I THINK, IN THE THIRD

GRADE.

SHE CAME RUNNING OUT OF THE KITCHEN WHERE WE HAD A WALL

TELEPHONE AND SAID, DADDY, PRESIDENT JOHNSON IS ON THE

PHONE FOR YOU. AND SO I SAID, IS IT THE

PRESIDENT OR IS IT HIS SECRETARY?

NO, IT IS THE PRESIDENT.

HE SAID, THIS IS PRESIDENT JOHNSON, LET ME TALK YOUR

DADDY.

SO, I WENT IN AND TO THE WALL TELEPHONE AND I SAID, YES,

SIR, MR.

PRESIDENT.

AND HE SAID, FRED, I HOPE YOU'RE GOING TO WATCH

TELEVISION.

THESE WERE HIS WORDS.

I HOPE YOU'RE GOING TO WATCH TELEVISION TONIGHT.

I SAID, I AM.

HE SAID, I AM GOING TO APPOINT THAT COMMISSION YOU HAVE BEEN

TALKING ABOUT.

I SAID, WELL, I THINK THAT IS THE THING TO DO.

HE SAID, I AM GOING TO PUT YOU ON IT.

I SAID, WELL, I NEVER EXPECTED THAT, BUT I'LL DO THE BEST I

CAN.

HE SAID, NOW DON'T BE LIKE SOME OF YOUR COLLEAGUES, HE

SAID.

I APPOINT THEM TO THINGS AND THEY NEVER SHOW UP.

I SAID, WELL, I'LL SHOW UP.

I'LL WORK AT IT.

HE SAID, ANOTHER THING, FRED, I SAID YES, SIR,

MR.

PRESIDENT, HE SAID, I WANT YOU TO

REMEMBER YOU'RE A JOHNSON MAN, AND I SAID, I AM A JOHNSON

MAN.

HE SAID, IF YOU FORGET IT, I'LL TAKE MY POCKETKNIFE AND

CUT YOUR BLANKS OFF.

HE DID NOT SAY BLANKS.

HE SAID, YOU UNDERSTAND THAT KIND TALK OF TALK, DON'T YOU?

I SAID, YES I DO.

SO I WENT BACK TO THE LIVING ROOM AND THEY SAID, WHAT DID

HE SAY?

HE SAID, WELL, SOME OF IT WAS KIND OF PERSONAL.

IT TURNED OUT, OF COURSE, JOHNSON DID NOT LIKE OUR

EVENTUAL REPORT THAT KERNER COMMISSION AS IT CAME TO BE

CALLED, AND I THINK I HAD FORGOTTEN THAT I WAS A JOHNSON

MAN.

THAT WAS REALLY SAD BECAUSE PRESIDENT JOHNSON DID MORE TO

COMBAT RACISM AND POVERTY THAN ANY PRESIDENT BEFORE OR SINCE,

BUT HE WAS MISLED ABOUT WHAT WE RECOMMENDED AND REJECTED

OUR REPORT.

>> THIS WAS A BIPARTISAN BODY.

WHAT DID YOU GUYS HOPE TO FIND?

>> WELL, WHAT WE WANTED TO DO WAS TO MAKE -- FIRST TO FIND

THE FACTS, WHAT ARE THE FACTS IN THESE CENTRAL CITIES, FOR

EXAMPLE, POLICE COMMUNITY RELATIONS, WHICH TURNED OUT TO

BE HORRIBLE, WITH ENORMOUS HOSTILITY.

WHY HAD THESE RIOTS OCCURRED IN ONE PLACE AND NOT ANOTHER?

WE NEVER WERE ABLE TO ANSWER THAT, BUT WE COULD DESCRIBE

WITH PARTICULARITY THE CONDITIONS IN THE CITIES WHERE

RIOTS HAD OCCURRED AND WE WANTED TO COME UP WITH

SOLUTIONS, WHAT WE MUST DO, TO GET AT THESE PROBLEMS OF

POVERTY AND RACISM WHICH WERE AT THE BASE OF THESE RIOTS.

>> WHEN YOU VISITED IN THE RIOT CITIES, CITIES THAT HAD

SUFFERED RIOTS AND TALKED TO BLACK RESIDENTS, WHAT DID SOME

OF THE BLACK RESIDENTS TELL YOU THE PROBLEM WAS?

>> WELL, ALL OF THEM WERE COMPLAINING, EVERYBODY WE

TALKED TO, COMPLAINED ABOUT THE POLICE.

THERE WAS ENORMOUS HOSTILITY TO THE POLICE.

AND, FOR EXAMPLE, PRESIDENT JOHNSON, AS HE TALKED TO ME

ABOUT IT SEVERAL TIMES DURING THE COMMISSION, THESE TWO

TIMES DURING THE COMMISSION MEETINGS, HE SAID HE THOUGHT

THAT THERE WAS SOME CONSPIRACY BEHIND THE RIOTS.

THAT PEOPLE LIKE H BROWN AND STOKLEY CARMICHAEL, MILITANTS

OF THE DAY, BLACK MILITANTS, HE THOUGHT THEY SOMEHOW

PLANNED THESE RIOTS AND CALLED FOR THEM BY THEIR AGITATION,

AND I TRIED TO TELL HIM, NO, THAT WASN'T TRUE, THAT THERE

WERE THOUSANDS OF H BROWNS AND STOKLEY CARMICHAELS THAT

NEITHER HE FOR I HAD EVER HEARD OF, BUT THERE WAS SUCH

HOSTILITY AND THE CONDITIONS WERE SO TERRIBLE IN THESE

CENTRAL CITIES, THAT ALMOST ANY RANDOM SPARK COULD SET OFF

A RIOT AND THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAD OCCURRED.

>> WHEN YOU VISITED THE CITIES, YOU HAD ALREADY SPOKEN

OUT ABOUT POVERTY AND INEQUALITY BEFORE THIS.

WHEN YOU VISITED CITIES, WHAT CHANGED IN YOU WHEN YOU SAW

THE POVERTY?

>> WELL, IT DID NOT SURPRISE ME.

I EXPECTED THAT BUT IT REALLY SORT OF PUT FACES ON THE

RACISM AND POVERTY, TO SEE THE ACTUAL RESULTS.

ALSO, IT DID THIS, TOO.

FOR EXAMPLE, WE DIVIDED UP.

THE PEOPLE ON THE COMMISSION DIVIDED UP IN TEAMS AND WENT

AROUND TO THE CITIES WHERE RIOTS HAD OCCURRED.

>> MAYOR LINDSEY AND I TURNED OUT TO BE A TEAM.

>> MAYOR FROM NEW YORK?

>> YEAH, LINDSEY OF NEW YORK HE AND I WERE ACTUALLY

ACTIVIST LEADERS ON THE COMMISSION AND WE WENT AROUND

TO MILWAUKEE, FOR EXAMPLE AND CINCINNATI.

I SPENT THE MORNING IN MILWAUKEE IN A BLACK BARBER

SHOP AND I TALKED TO PEOPLE AS THEY CAME IN, MEN, AND WHAT I

FOUND WAS, THESE PEOPLE HAD COME TO MILWAUKEE FAIRLY LATE,

THIS WAS TRUE ALL OVER THE COUNTRY, TRYING TO BREAK A

SURGE -- BLACK PEOPLE MOVING FROM THE SOUTH INTO THE CITIES

IN THE NORTH, LOOKING FOR WORK.

AND THEY CAME TO PLACES LIKE MILWAUKEE JUST ABOUT THE TIME

THE JOBS WERE DISAPPEARING OR MOVING OUT TO THE SUBURBS OR

MOVING OVERSEAS AND SO WE TALKED ABOUT THAT WITH PEOPLE,

BUT ALSO I WOULD ASK, DO YOU FIND AS MUCH DISCRIMINATION

AGAINST AFRICAN AMERICANS IN MILWAUKEE OR BACK HOME IN

BIRMINGHAM OR WHATEVER, JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI.

AT FIRST PEOPLE WERE PUZZLED.

I FOUND OUT WHY, BECAUSE, IN MILWAUKEE, MOST OF THEM SAID

THEY NEVER SAW ANY WHITE PEOPLE.

IT WAS MORE SEGREGATED THAN THE PLACES WHERE THEY HAD COME

FROM IN THE SOUTH.

THERE WAS THAT MUCH SEGREGATION EXISTED.

TODAY, THAT IS A PROBLEM THAT IS RISING AGAIN.

OUR CITIES, OUR SCHOOLS, ARE RESEGREGATING AND THAT IS NOT

GOOD.

>> SO, AFTER WEEKS OF RESEARCH AND AFTER YOU GUYS DEBATING

AND VOTING ON THE COMMISSION, WHAT DID THE COMMISSION

FINALLY CONCLUDE?

>> WELL, THE MOST FAMOUS FINDING WAS, OUR NATION IS

MOVING TOWARD TWO SOCIETIES, ONE BLACK, ONE WHITE, SEPARATE

AND UNEQUAL.

TODAY WE WOULD ADD HISPANIC TO THAT.

BUT, ALSO, WE WENT ON TO SAY THAT THESE BLACK GHETTOS WERE

CREATED BY WHITE RACISM AND SUSTAINED BY WHITE RACISM.

AND, THAT CAME ACROSS AS A KIND OF A SHOCK TO PEOPLE,

BUT, IT WAS THE TRUTH.

WE ALSO TRIED OUR BEST TO HELP PEOPLE SEE THROUGH OUR EYES

THE KIND OF WRETCHED POVERTY, TERRIBLE HOUSING, TWO AND

THREE FAMILIES LIVING IN WHAT HAD ONCE BEEN A SINGLE FAMILY

HOME, JOBS GONE, NO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION.

INFERIOR SCHOOLS AND SO MANY OF THEM HAD COME ALREADY COME

FROM CRIMINALLY INFERIOR SCHOOLS BACK IN THE SOUTH AND

IT WAS REALLY URGENT THAT WE GET AT THESE PROBLEMS AND WE

WERE QUITE HONEST IN SAYING THAT IT WAS GOING TO TAKE A

GREAT INCREASE IN FEDERAL FUNDS TO COMBAT THEM.

WE ALSO, FOR EXAMPLE, GOT WITH THE POLICE.

WE SAID, THAT THE POLICE OUGHT TO LOOK LIKE THE PEOPLE THAT

THEY ARE POLICING.

IN OTHER WORDS, WE WERE TALKING ABOUT WHAT CAN BE

CALLED COMMUNITY POLICING.

PEOPLE WERE RIGHT IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

INSTEAD, WHAT IT WAS IN THOSE DAYS, THE POLICE WERE ALL

WHITE AND COMING IN TO ENFORCE THE LAW AGAINST THE PEOPLE

THERE, SO THAT PEOPLE DIDN'T SEE THE LAW AND LAW

ENFORCEMENT AS THEIR OWN. AND WE THOUGHT THE ATTITUDES

OUGHT TO CHANGE, USE OF FORCE.

WE WERE AGAINST THE MILITARIZATION OF THE POLICE

AND WE MADE HEADWAY ON ALL THESE THINGS, RELATIONS,

POVERTY AND POLICE RELATIONS FOR A TIME, BUT THEN THAT

PROGRESS STOPPED AND WE BEGAN TO GO BACKWARDS.

>> THE REPORT THAT YOU GUYS WERE SAID TO RELEASE AT THE

END OF FEBRUARY AND BEGINNING OF MARCH IN 1968, YOU GUYS

WERE DOING BACKGROUND, BUT THE WASHINGTON POST GOT A HOLD OF

THE REPORT AHEAD OF TIME.

SOMEONE LEAKED IT TO THEM.

WHAT HAPPENED AFTER THAT?

>> WELL, WE HAD -- FIRST I SHOULD SAY, WE MADE A MISTAKE

IN NOT HAVING OUR HEARINGS.

WE HAD HEARINGS FOR SOMETHING LIKE 20 STRAIGHT DAYS.

WE HEARD FROM EVERYBODY LIKE ALL THE WAY FROM FBI DIRECTOR,

EDGAR HOOVER, TO MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR. AND WE MADE A

MISTAKE NOT HAVING THOSE AS PUBLIC HEARINGS.

WE ALSO MADE A MISTAKE, I THINK, OF NOT TAKING THE PRESS

WITH US AS WE WENT AROUND TO THE RIOT CITIES SO THEY COULD

SEE IT PERSONALLY.

AND WE ALSO MADE A MISTAKE, I THINK, NOT BRIEFING PRESIDENT

JOHNSON ALL ALONG SO THAT HE SAW THE SAME THINGS WE DID.

SO, WE KNEW THAT WHEN THIS REPORT CAME OUT, WHEN IT SAID

RACISM AND IT TALKED ABOUT SPENDING MORE MONEY AGAINST

POVERTY, THAT WAS GOING TO BE SOMEWHAT OF A SHOCK.

SO WE GAVE THE REPORT OUT WITH AN EMBARGO SO THAT PEOPLE

WOULD HAVE A CHANCE TO BE BACKGROUNDED AND LEARN SORT OF

WHAT WAS BEHIND OUR RECOMMENDATIONS.

THEN, I THINK WITH THAT INTENT IN ORDER TO LESSEN ITS

IMPACTS, SOMEBODY LEAKED THE REPORT TO THE WASHINGTON POST

AND TRIED TO TALK THEM OUT OF USING IT, BUT THEY SAID THEY

GOT IT LEGALLY AND THEY WERE NOT GOING TO DO THAT, THEY

WERE GOING TO PUBLISH IT THE NEXT MORNING.

AND SO WE SAID, WELL, WE ARE GOING TO GIVE IT TO EVERYBODY

THEN.

IT WAS JUST ABSOLUTE CHAOS.

I REMEMBER, FOR EXAMPLE, AN AP REPORTER CALLING ME THAT

EVENING AND HE SAID, I HAVE GOT A 30 MINUTE DEADLINE.

HERE IS A REPORT THAT IS ABOUT 400 AND SOME PAGES LONG AND HE

SAID, I HAVE A 30 MINUTE DEADLINE, CAN YOU CAPSULIZE IT

FOR ME?

THE RESULT WAS THAT THE HEADLINES ALL ACROSS THE

COUNTRY, THE POST AND EVERYWHERE ELSE WERE SOMETHING

LIKE, WHITE RACISM CAUSE OF BLACK RIOTS, COMMISSION SAYS.

MY OWN FATHER, WHO LOVED ME, SMALL FARMER OUT IN WEST

OKLAHOMA, THE WAY HE HEARD THAT COMMISSION REPORT, WAS

MR.

HARRIS, OUT OF THE GOODNESS OF YOUR HEART, YOU

OUGHT TO PAY MORE TAXES IN ORDER TO HELP POOR BLACK

PEOPLE WHO ARE RIOTING IN DETROIT.

AND MY DAD'S RESPONSE WAS SOMETHING LIKE, THE HELL WITH

THAT I AM ALREADY PAYING TOO MUCH TAXES AND HE WAS RIGHT

ABOUT THAT.

WE ALSO -- WE DIDN'T MAKE CLEAR ENOUGH AND WE DID SAY IN

THE REPORT, THAT WE WERE INTERESTED IN POVERTY,

WHEREVER IT WAS, RURAL OR URBAN, WE WERE INTERESTED IN

PROBLEMS OF WHITE PEOPLE, BLACK PEOPLE, HISPANIC AND

AMERICAN INDIANS AND OTHERS, BUT MY DAD NEVER HEARD THAT

PART OF IT AND I THINK A LOT OF OTHER PEOPLE DIDN'T EITHER.

HE WAS INTERESTED IN HIS LIFE AND HIS PROBLEMS RATHER THAN

THE PEOPLE WHO HAD BEEN INVOLVED IN THE RIOTS.

>> PRESIDENT JOHNSON WAS SO COMMITTED TO FIGHTING POVERTY

IN THE POVERTY PROGRAMS, WHY DIDN'T HE ADOPT SOME OF THE

RECOMMENDATIONS?

>> WE HAD MADE AN APPOINTMENT WITH HIM, ALL THE CURRENT

COMMISSION AND PRINCIPAL STAFF, TO MEET WITH HIM AND

DELIVER THE REPORT AND THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN SET UP AND WE

KNOW THAT NOW, WE DIDN'T THEN, BUT SINCE FOUND THE LETTERS,

HE HAD -- THE STAFF HAD WRITTEN LETTERS FOR HIM TO

SIGN PRAISING THIS REPORT AND THANKING US AND SO FORTH, BUT

HE SAID, I AM NOT GOING TO SIGN THOSE AND HE NEVER DID.

BUT, WE UNDERSTOOD FROM THE WHITE HOUSE STAFF THAT A TEXAS

MEMBER OF CONGRESS, A CLOSE FRIEND OF JOHNSON'S, HAD SAID

TO HIM, THIS COMMISSION, THE CURRENT COMMISSION, IS GOING

TO RUIN YOU.

WE UNDERSTOOD THESE WERE HIS WORDS, THAT IT DOESN'T HAVE --

IT CONDONES AND ENCOURAGES RIOTS AND IT DOESN'T HAVE A

GOOD WORD TO SAY ABOUT ALL YOU HAVE DONE AGAINST POVERTY AND

RACISM.

ALL OF WHICH WAS FALSE BUT JOHNSON, I THINK, BELIEVED IT.

HE CANCELED THE MEETING WITH US.

WE HAD ASKED ALSO THAT HE GIVE US ANOTHER SIX MONTHS OF LIFE

SO WE CAN ADVOCATE FOR AND LOBBY FOR OUR RECOMMENDATIONS.

OF COURSE, THAT NEVER HAPPENED AND AS I SAID, THAT IS A

REALLY SAD THING BECAUSE MISINFORMED, THAT IS THE

ACTION HE TOOK, JOHNSON, BUT IT IS SAD TO ME BECAUSE

JOHNSON, AS I SAID, DID MORE AGAINST POVERTY AND AGAINST

RACISM THAN ANY OF HIS PREDECESSORS OR SUCCESSORS

SINCE.

>> NOW, YOU WERE SEAT MATES WITH SENATOR ROBERT F. KENNEDY

FROM NEW YORK, AND IN 1968 POVERTY WAS ON HIS MIND, WOULD

BE UNTIL HIS ASSASSINATION DURING HIS PRESIDENTIAL

CAMPAIGN.

HOW DID HE RESPOND TO THE REPORT?

>> DURING THE STUDY, YOU KNOW, HE WAS SENATOR FROM NEW YORK

AND REALLY SAW, AS JOHNSON DID, MAYOR LINDSEY AS A

POTENTIAL RIVAL.

JOHNSON THOUGHT LINDSEY WAS GOING TO RUN AGAINST HIM FOR

PRESIDENT.

HE LATER DID RERUN FOR PRESIDENT.

BUT KENNEDY SAID TO ME JOKINGLY, HE SAID, WHAT IT IS

LIKE TO WORK WITH JOHN LINDSEY, EXPECTING ME TO SAY,

WELL, YOU KNOW, HE IS JUST A DILATANT AND WHATEVER.

AND I SAID, HE IS REALLY TERRIFIC.

I SAID, HE IS REALLY ENGAGED.

HE NEVER MISSED A MEETING AND IS INVOLVED AND IDEAS ARE

TERRIFIC IN DOING SOMETHING ABOUT RACISM AND POVERTY.

AND ROBERT WAS A LITTLE BIT INCREDULOUS, BUT IT WAS GOOD

FOR HIM TO HEAR THAT, BUT HE WAS VERY MUCH IN FAVOR OF THE

REPORT WHEN IT CAME OUT. AND HE CAUSED SENATOR JOE

CLARK, CHAIRMAN IN THE SENATE, TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS SO

THAT WE COULD COME AND TESTIFY BEFORE THE SENATE COMMITTEE IN

FAVOR OF OUR RECOMMENDATIONS.

>> MARTIN LUTHER KING IS ASSASSINATED, ROBERT KENNEDY

IS ASSASSINATED.

PRESIDENT RICHARD NIXON IS ELECTED ON A LAW AND ORDER

PLATFORM.

WHAT HAPPENS WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS DURING HIS

PRESIDENCY?

>> WE STILL HAD PROGRESS FOR A WHILE, AS I SAID, ON RACE AND

POVERTY, BUT ABOUT THE TIME OF THE ADVENT OF THE REAGAN-BUSH

ADMINISTRATION, THAT IS WHEN THE PROGRESS STOPPED.

NIXON REALLY TRIED TO MAKE HAY OUT OF THE RIOTS, YOU KNOW,

LAW AND ORDER AND SO FORTH AND IN A WAY SORT OF SPEAKING IN

CODE ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE.

AND THEY HAD A SOUTHERN STRATEGY, WHICH EVERYBODY

KNOWS NOW, AND I THINK REAGAN DID TOO, SO THAT THINGS WENT

BACKWARDS AND THAT IS THE WAY IT HAS BEEN EVER SINCE THE

ADVENT OF THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION, WITH THE

EXCEPTION OF THE TIME WHEN BILL CLINTON WAS IN, WE BEGAN

TO MAKE A LITTLE PROGRESS AGAIN, AND THEN FELL

BACKWARDS, AND THEN WHEN OBAMA CAME IN, HE MADE SOME PROGRESS

AGAIN, BUT I AM AFRAID MOVED BACKWARDS AGAIN.

>> DID WE MAKE PROGRESS DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION WITH

SOME OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXAMINATIONS INTO

POLICE LIKE HERE IN ALBUQUERQUE?

>> PRESIDENT OBAMA APPOINTED A COMMISSION TO MAKE

RECOMMENDATIONS IN REGARD TO THE POLICE, REALLY GOOD

RECOMMENDATIONS, BUT, I DON'T THINK MUCH WAS DONE AFTER THAT

FROM THE FEDERAL LEVEL AT TRYING TO GET THEM

IMPLEMENTED.

SO, WE HAD ALL OF THESE HORRIBLE POLICE KILLINGS OF

BLACK YOUNG MEN AND NOT IN ANY INSTANCE HAS ANYBODY EVER BEEN

CONVICTED ON TRIAL, NO POLICE OFFICER, AND I THINK THERE WAS

A GREAT DEAL OF ATTITUDE CHANGES THAT IS NECESSARY AND

I THINK WE HAVE GOT TO USE LAPEL CAMERAS MUCH MORE AND

GET BACK TO COMMUNITY POLICING AGAIN.

STOP THIS MILITARIZATION OF THE POLICE, WHERE SHOOTING IS

SORT OF A FIRST -- I THINK NORMALLY WHAT YOU DO IS SEND

IN SOME TEAM THAT IS GOING TO TRY TO SORT OF CUT DOWN THE

PROBLEMS THAT ARE CONFRONTING THE POLICE IN THOSE INSTANCES,

RATHER THAN THE SWAT TEAM.

>> IT HAS BEEN 50 YEARS SINCE THE REPORT, ALMOST 50 YEARS,

YOU'RE ABOUT TO RELEASE THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE

REPORT, UPDATE ON RACE AND POVERTY IN AMERICA.

WHAT IS THIS NEW REPORT GOING TO TELL US?

>> QUITE SADLY, THE INEQUALITY OF INCOME AND WEALTH IN THE

COUNTRY HAS WORSENED GREATLY SINCE THE TIME OF THE PRIMARY

REPORT IN 1968.

AND, WE ARE RESEGREGATING IN OUR CITIES AND HOUSING AND IN

SCHOOLS AND THAT IS REALLY BAD.

WE FIND THAT THE INCOMES OF AFRICAN AMERICANS AND

HISPANICS AND SO FORTH, OTHER MINORITIES, HAVE NOT INCREASED

AS OTHERS HAVE AND IT TURNS OUT, ACTUALLY, IN FAIRLY

RECENT YEARS, THERE HAS BEEN A STAGNATION OF WAGES AND INCOME

FOR MIDDLE INCOME AND POOR PEOPLE GENERALLY.

THE TAXES HAVE BEEN CUT FOR RICH PEOPLE AND THERE IS AN

EFFORT NOW TO TRY TO DO MORE OF THAT.

YOU KNOW, WITH THE IDEA THAT IT STIMULATES ECONOMIC GROWTH

AND SO FORTH, WHICH WE PROVED TO BE WRONG RIGHT HERE IN NEW

MEXICO AS IN KANSAS AND ANYWHERE ELSE IN THE COUNTRY

OR IN THE WORLD.

SO, THINGS ARE REALLY TOUGHER.

POVERTY IS HARDER TO GET OUT OF NOW THAN IT WAS BACK IN OUR

DAY.

A LOT OF THESE MEDIATING INSTITUTIONS HAVE DISAPPEARED

IN THE CENTRAL CITIES.

PEOPLE, A LOT OF CENTRAL CITIES HAVE BEGUN TO GENTRIFY,

SO THAT POVERTY HAS BEEN SORT OF TRANSLATED OUT TO THE

SUBURBS AND IN SOME CASES, THE EXURBS, AND WE HAVE REALLY CUT

DOWN ON THE MONEY THAT WE HAVE BEEN SPENDING ON -- REAL

DOLLARS -- ON EDUCATION AND TRAINING AND ON JOB CREATION

AND SO FORTH.

AND THAT IS WHAT IS HUGELY NEEDED.

WHEN JOHN LINDSEY AND I WERE WALKING AROUND TO THESE RIOT

CITIES THEN IN 1968, WE ENCOUNTERED OFTEN ON THE

STREETS, YOUNG BLACK MEN OF THE TYPE THAT COULD HAVE BEEN

INVOLVED IN THE RIOTS IN THAT CITY AND WHAT THEY ALL SAID TO

US, ALMOST IN A CHORUS, WAS JOBS.

THEY SAID JOBS, BABY.

JOBS, BABY.

THAT IS WHAT WE NEED IS JOBS.

CINCINNATI, STREETS OF CINCINNATI, ONE BLACK MAN, ONE

GUY SAID, MR.

JOHNSON GOT ME A JOB LAST SUMMER, TALKING ABOUT

PRESIDENT JOHNSON IN THE SUMMER PROGRAM BUT THAT RAN

OUT.

HE SAID, WE NEED JOBS, BABY.

AND THAT WAS THE GREATEST NEED AND IT IS TODAY.

>> INEQUALITY AND POVERTY THAT YOU SPEAK OF TODAY, 50 YEARS

LATER, WE DON'T HAVE TO ACCEPT THAT AS A NATION; RIGHT?

>> POVERTY IS A DECISION.

YOU KNOW.

WE DECIDE WE ARE GOING TO HAVE ALL THIS POVERTY.

THAT IS NOT TRUE.

WE DON'T HAVE TO HAVE IT.

WE GET OUR PRIORITIES STRAIGHT, THERE IS PLENTY OF

MONEY TO DO WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.

AND THERE ARE PLENTY OF JOBS THAT NEED DOING THAT WE OUGHT

TO BE SURE, FOR EXAMPLE, WE OUGHT TO BE INVESTING IN THE

NEW KIND OF JOBS IN TECHNOLOGY AND WIND AND SOLAR AND ENERGY,

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY, AND SO FORTH, PLENTY OF JOBS LIKE

THAT, AND CHILD CARE AND PARTICULARLY IN EDUCATION, AND

HEALTH.

WE HAVE GOT PLENTY OF JOBS THAT NEED DOING AND THERE IS A

LOT OF PEOPLE THAT NEED THOSE JOBS.

>> SENATOR FRED HARRIS, THANK YOU FOR JOINING US, WE REALLY

APPRECIATE IT.

For more infomation >> Episode 1122 | Former U.S. Senator Fred Harris - Duration: 25:19.

-------------------------------------------

Lakeland Current 1107 - A Visit with US Congressman Rick Nolan - Duration: 28:02.

♪ Lakeland Currents, your public affairs

program for north central Minnesota. Produced by Lakeland

Public Television with Host Ray Gildow.

Production funding for Lakeland Currents is made possible by Bemidji

Regional Airport, serving the region with daily flights to Minneapolis-St. Paul

International Airport. More information available at

bemidjiairport.org. Closed captioning for Lakeland

Currents is sponsored by Nisswa Tax Service. Tax preparation

for businesses and individuals. Online at

nisswatax.com.

Ray: Hello again everyone and welcome to Lakeland Currents.

The eighth congressional district is a

geographic huge place.

27,500 square miles if you can imagine how big that

is. The anchor of this is

the city of Duluth which is Minnesota's fifth largest city

and about 63/64 percent of the people

who live in the eight district are considered to be urban

not...or are considered to be rural rather not urban.

And it's my great pleasure today to have the congressman

from the eighth district here, Rick Nolan. And

welcome to Lakeland Currents. Rick: Well, thank you I'm delighted to be here.

It's great program, great show and a

great congressional district. By the way, it's bigger than 10 states.

Ray: Is it really? Rick: Yeah, yeah. It's huge. Ray: Wow! I can believe that cause it's

long. Rick: It's pretty hard to go anywhere without getting

you know, at least three or four hours coming and going

in the car. Ray: And you know, at one time it was

completely democratic when it was a little bit of a different geographic

stretch than it is now. [Yeah] And over the last few elections it's

been a lot closer balance between republican and

democratic. But the Iron Range

area, the Duluth area, still I would guess is pretty much

democratic. That's probably where...Rick: Well, it is pretty good although

you know, there's this Nate Silver, he's kind of

the quintessential guru of campaigns

and election analysis. And he analyzes

every district in the country for their competitiveness.

And he just finished analyzing

194

democrats. He'll do the same for the republicans

but mine is the most difficult race in the

country for a democrat to win. [Wow] And

so, and on a...some of the recent

polling we're seeing on just a generic

basis, you know, we're going to vote for

would you vote for the democrat or the republican? The republican

wins by about six points. Our most recent

polling still shows me winning by about a similar amount

So, but it's a very very competitive district until

this thing in Georgia, it was the most competitive

or expensive in the country. It was well

over 20 million dollars, which is just obscene.

Begs to question, you know, how does this happen?

And we need to fix and change...that.

Ray: During the Jim Obestair...Oberstar

era rather, pretty much reliable district

for the democrats, wasn't it. Rick: Oh gosh! I mean you could never

call any state wide election until the

eight district vote came in. Because it was always gonna

be huge, it was gonna be 60-75 percent democratic

but it's not like that at all anymore. Ray: So now,

from my perspective, whoever represents the district and you are

representing it now in your second term it's just

a tight rope to walk, isn't it? Because if you look at

supporting say, mining issues? You're gonna have the

environmentalists who are against that. [Yeah] And I don't know

if people who don't get involved with politics understand

how challenging that is to balance

these things out. Rick: Well, it...truly is.

And you know, you and I are in the same

age bracket even though you look a lot younger than I do. [Yeah right]

Yeah, um. [laughter] So but you remember when we were kids

I mean the rivers were running sewers and the lakes were catching

on fire and acid rain was destroying the forest.

The narrative then was you know, we can't

have all these environmental rules and regulations or nobody

will be able to do any business. And

unfortunately now that narrative has flopped

they're flipped. And you have people saying

well, we can't do any mining or

manufacturing....

because then we won't have an environment. But there were

many of us then and who continue now myself included,

to say no, no. We've got the brains, we got the science. We certainly

have the needs, just muster up the political will.

We should be able to do both. And we proved

that we could. I mean, and we didn't

know how they were gonna do it, Ray.

But you know the automobile industry came up with a catalytic

converter to scrub the sulphur out of

automobile exhaust. And we stopped the acid rain.

The power companies and the paper mills came up with scrubbers

to take the toxins and other

pollutants that were going into the rivers and the lakes.

And we even have a thing now called reverse osmosis

which we did not have back in the day. You can take a

pump and push some kind of a liquid through

it and you can filter out a virus. You know, how many

parts of sulphur per million do you want? You know,

300, 100, 10, 0? Obviously it gets

more expensive the more you want to dial it

down. But I'm of the view that we still

have the smarts, the brains, the technology

and the technologies keep growing and....

getting better all the time. And

we....have I think a

profound obligation to do both.

Ray: You and the governor both have supported now the mining

project up in north east Minnesota.

And could you just talk a little bit about that? Rick: Sure, sure.

Before I do, I want to point out one thing. I just attended

a lecture here recently by a doctor

Jim Boyer, who's written a book called "The

Irresponsible Pursuit of Paradise".

And he talks about how dependent we are

upon the import of so many of these

extracted minerals that are responsible

for our communications, responsible and

necessary. Ray: Copper, uranium. Rick: Yeah, copper, nickel, iron

ore, you name it. And we're actually

exporting....

the need for these minerals

to developing countries around the world where they have no

enviro...virtually no environmental rules and regulations.

And a great deal of human exploitation.

And that's something that people I think have to start

thinking about. We don't want to be a bunch of...a nation of

nimbies exporting

and degradating everybody elses environment in the world.

Especially when we have the capacity and we have the most

rigorous rules and regulations anywhere in the world. We have the capacity to

do it here and do it well. Polymet

is a good case and point. They've

undergone 12 years of scrutinization.

They've been approved by the EPA

by the Forestry

by Interior by the DNR

by the PCA, by Fish

and Wildlife Services. And time and time and again

they've been asked to go back to the board

and to demonstrate what kind of abatement procedures

they're going to use. And demonstrate their

effectiveness. And

so I've been the same ol' guy I always was. I've

been an ardent supporter of the environment but I'm an ardent supporter

of mining as well.

And....I gotta tell you something else

that people haven't thought about in this. Of course it's important

for the jobs and the economy in northern Minnesota.

But guess what, Homeland Security just did a

study recently and they found

that 13 percent of the nations gross national

product goes through the lochs

at the Sioux Narrows. Now why is that relevant to us? That

that's how Lake Superior gets into the Great Lakes.

And the bulk of that material

is iron ore from MInnesota's range going

through the port of Duluth. And

the study concluded that if those lochs failed

it would throw the country into a great depression. [Wow] Because

that ore supplies all the Great Lake steel mills

and they supply the automobile industry and all the heavy

industrials. Which is why we have

military protection there. Because again if that

failed because we shut down the mines or the

fail just from obsolescence

and or they were some kind of an asymmetrical

or overt military tact, it would throw the country into a great

depression and put seven million people

out of business. So,

bottom line is you know, I've been working to get the

and I've gotten a considerable amount of money to do a feasibility

study cause the lochs are obsolete and they're causing a lot

of trouble. But more

importantly this mining here in northern MInnesota is of

course important for us. But it's important for the whole country. Our national

security, our national economy. And

tourism is important too. So we have to make sure that

we impose and insist on these rigorous state

and federal standards. But for the most part, industry

is ok with that. You know, they used to fight that. They now understand that

American people expect you know, good strong

standards. So as long as we have those good standards in place there's no reason

why we can't do mining and have

continuous of the clean water and healthy

atmosphere we have up here in the eighth district. We have the cleanest water

in the state, by the way. Ray: In the eighth district. Right. Rick: We want to keep it that way, yup.

Ray: Some of the key issues facing

the eighth district are the same issues facing all of Minnesota.

Health care is certainly one of them. [Yeah] And now

this week as they start negotiating the tax

bill, at least on the senate side or the

house I can't remember which is, it looks like they might

start looking at that American health care or the

American... Rick: Yeah the ACA.

Ray: ACA. And taking... Rick: Yeah, American...otherwise known as Obamacare. Ray: Taking out

the requirement that you have to have insurance. Rick: Yeah, yeah.

Ray: What's your take on what's....[Yeah]

it's hard to figure out what's going on. I don't believe... Rick: Yeah, well it's a

moving target. It's just changing. Ray: I suspect that you are the answer to all this.

Rick: No, no. It's changing from day to day. But

the essential challenge

here is is that under

the current system, outside

of Medicare and some Medicaid

everybody in America has got a different insurance policy.

Depending on how old you are, what your health is, what

your income is, how many children you have, how many

dependents you have, what's your zip code.

And it's become an administrative nightmare.

I introduced the...one of the

first single payer proposals when I had served

in the congress back in the 70's. There were only four of us

that supported it at the time. Ray: And what is single payer?

Rick: You know, first of all it's what most of

the rest of the wor...developed countries in the world do.

And.....and

they get better results and they pay

dramatically less for health care than we do.

It's so fundamentally American. And here's what it is.

Everybody's got the same policy, ok?

So administratively you'd do it for two-three percent.

Instead of 30, 40, 50 percent.

And....and everybody

everybody pays. So...

between...and everybody pays the same rate.

Ray: Nineteen different. Rick: So everybody pays, everybody pays the same rate

and everybody pays. It's a wonderful

formula. And of course it doesn't cover some of the more

exotic plastic surgery but it covers all the

basics. So all the developed countries...and they do that

that's fundamentally what Medicare is. Which is why

a number of people have called you know, for Medicare

for all. Because that's a single payer, it's not a socializing..

it's not socializing medical care. But

it...the doctors remain independent

businesses providing health

services. But I wanted to tell you when I introduced this

there were four of us back in the 70's, ok? And oh my

gosh, the medical community they were so upset with me. My

gosh. It was frightening sometimes to go to a public

meeting. I was afraid I'd get my tongue or ripped out or my eyes

ripped out. And they spent a lot of money trying

to defeat me. Well, here we are you know, quite some

years later. We have 130 sponsors

now. And guess who's contributing to my campaign?

The American Medical Association and the medical doctors. [Really?] Why?

I've had a doctor in Duluth tell me he's spending

90 percent, and I think on average they say they're

spending about 50 percents of their time and their money

in their offices processing all of these

insurance claims. Ray: I've had doctors on the show and they all say the

same thing. Rick: Yeah, and that's not what they went into medicine for. They went

into medicine to....it's a healing

arts profession. They want to heal people and fix people. They don't want to sit

around being medical insurance

process claimers.

So, that's exciting. And we're building more and

more support for that. And we're gonna get there.

And I'm confident that it's just gonna take a little

more time. Ray: I believe last year you were voted

as one of the most successful

congressman in working across the

aisle. Rick: You know, I was. And it....

it actually wasn't a vote

several of the Universities, Virginia and Vanderbelt

they just looked at bills and amendments that

all the members of congress had introduced and followed them

to see how many of them had become law of the

land. And I'm proud to say

that I became...I was the second most effective

of all 194 democrats in

the house. And one of the ten most effective.

And then they concluded from that being that

I'm in the minority and I remind myself and others

that I had bi-partisan support for all

that legislation. And....

you know you and I were talking earlier about

the....

George Washington's farewell address. And how

poignant it is for today. It was kind of a message

for future generations.

Where he said the greatest threats to democracy

were as......

as I recall, one is excessive partisanship. [Correct] We certainly

got that today. [Yup] The other

was the accumulation of massive deficits.

And we certainly

have that today. And the

third one was

influence by foreign governments on our politics. And we

certainly have that today. What

an incredibly visionary view Washington had. Ray: And I think there

was something even about the president

or the whoever is in power, starting to have influence

in the department of justice and some of those people to

use those for their own political game. I think that

was another one. The things he touched on. Rick: Yeah, yeah. One of the things that we needed

to be aware of if we wanted to preserve and protect... Ray: So it's kind of an ironic

Rick: And the other thing about it was is that

you know, he epitomized stability.

And integrity. You know, never tell a lie.

He just....he

made people then proud of our

government and our way of life

and to this day

as our first president he makes us proud.

And there's been a tremendous degradation

of civility and

kindness and integrity in government. And it breaks

your heart to see so many people losing

faith and trust in their governmental processes.

It's a...there's a lot of

things that need fixing and I've got some ideas about how we fix them.

But they definitely need fixing and I think we

can all agree on that. Ray: One of the things you talked about when you

were here two years ago was the pressure that's on

incoming congressmen and senators to

raise money. [Yeah] Is that still...[Oh...]

is that still the same pressure you're dealing with? Rick: Yeah, it

is. It's only gotten worse, Ray. [Really?] Yeah.

They tell....

the new members that they should spend 25-30 hours

a week in the call centers [Wow] across the

street. [Wow]

And then you should have another 10 hours a week

in actual fundraising events.

And you know...

in my case...it's an eight hour trip

out to Washington door to door.

And I go out and come back every week.

So, you know do the math on that. And...

Ray: Aren't enough hours. Rick: I made a decision I said I'm not

going to go to the call centers. They never used

to exist when I served before or any other point in

history. I just said, look at this stage in my life

being a chance to go and serve and pay it forward

pay it back, because life's been good to our generation. And that's what's

getting away from this country. I said, I didn't go out to Washington

to become a middle level telemarketer. And

dialing for dollars. So I haven't.

So you know, I like to say my success as a legislator

is my ability to reach across the aisle. Find

public partners. But part of it just going to work on the peoples business

instead of going across the street raising money for yourself. [Sure]

It ain't a big secret. And I don't care what business

you're in, if you don't show up and go to work you're not gonna

get anything done. So it ain't rocket science. But I

want to see....this citizens united

reversed. That allows all this dark

money in the politics most of which is negative

and degrading of a camp...discourages good people

from running for public office. I think we need a system of

small donor contribution

supplemented by public financing.

I think we need to fix gerrymandering, the fact that there's 435

seats in the congress and only 24 of them are

competitive. That's not real democracy.

We need to have regular order. Right now I just

saw a report yesterday this

current congress has had more closed rules

than any other congress in the history of the country.

When I served before everything came up under an open

rule. If you had an idea, you offered it. And you debated

it and you argued it and that's how you find common ground.

But this healthcare legislation some

of which would put as many as 25-30 million people

on the streets without health care. And never

been presented and it with an opportunity to

make an amendment. The congress

the house just recently passed the

a tax bill under a closed rule.

Didn't matter if you were Rick Nolan or

Clem Kiddipelhopper you know, from Alabama.

If you had an amendment you wanted to offer you didn't get a

chance. It was voted up or down. [Wow] That's not real

democracy. [No, no] Real democracy is a lot of work.

You have to hear everybody out and make some tough decisions

but now it's mostly just partisan positioning

and one party ruling and shutting

everybody else out. Ray: Let's just talk a little bit about

that tax legislation because that is

the criticism coming from lots of places.

That this is being rushed through you know

after Thanksgiving there was gonna be or was a vote

and it's not involving

people even from industry or people from

the colleges [No] who are experts and economists

and those people when they get a chance to start looking

at the legislation they're pretty much petrified by what

they're seeing. And it's....you know the same

[inaudible] made against the democrats with Obamacare. That that

stuff was ran through. But that took over a

year to develop that legislation. [It did] And this legislation

for the taxes taking them weeks. Rick: We....yeah

we didn't have one minute of hearing on this tax bill

that the house recently passed. And

I am of the belief that if we had a vote

on whether or not kids who are struggling with

their education, well they're no longer kids anymore, they're paying

their student debt. If we had a vote on whether or not the interest

on their loans should be deductible we'd

win that. You know? If we had a vote on whether

or not your state and local taxes should be deductible

we'd win that. If we had a vote on whether

charitable contributions or you name it...you know

we would win those. But we don't have any votes on that.

Everybody that's...contacted me in my office

you know, in the run up to this

tax debate has really

serious problems with it. Our Minnesota commissioners

determine that under the house passed bill

450,000 Minnesotans are gonna get a tax increase.

They found that...

320,000 people would lose the deductibility

on the interest for their college education

loan. Geez, Ray, you know when you and I went to

college it was about a 100 bucks a quarter. Ray: Yeah, it was pretty reasonable. Rick: I mean it was virtually

free. Huh, come on?! Ray: Yeah it was. Rick: So,

and the truth of the matter is if somebody

does get a tax break under this thing in the middle class

although the CBO, Congressional Budget Office,

said anybody making under 70,000 dollars a

year is going to get a tax increase.

If you did it'd be...if you did get a break it'd be enough to

buy a hubcap on a Mercedes Benz. Ray: Not a new car.

Rick: But you know, the upper one percenters you know, they'll

be able to buy the whole Mercedes Benz.

Maybe a fleet of them. There's 1...1.5

trillion dollars in tax breaks for the upper one percent.

Ray: And it's increasing the debt significantly. Rick: And

pass...well....the things most egregious about

this are one, that's passing that debt onto our children,

that's unconscionable, 1.5 trillion

dollars. And then this huge tax

break for the super millionaires and billionaires the

one percenter. I'm sorry, they're not struggling. I don't know

a lot of them but I do happen to know a couple of them.

And they're doing just fine. And

and then it's going to impose a tax

increase on the middle class that's struggling so hard.

It's a terrible bill, terrible bill. Bodes very poorly

for our countries future. At a time when the rich are getting

richer in degrees unparalleled. The middle class is getting

crushed every which way they turn. And

and the poor just getting poorer. And

the disparity in wealth has never been

so great in this country since just before

the great depression. So that does not bode well. Ray: So...

when you have private conversations with your peers,

across the aisle, they must feel some of the

pressure of dealing with this too. Even though maybe they

have to take the party line. Rick: Oh, they do, yeah. Ray: Because my experience

has been when you get politicians in the back rooms and they're

alone they're just like we are. Rick: Yeah,

you know Mark Meadows heads that

tea party liberty conference or caucus.

He's one of my better friends there in the congress.

And you know what? He and the tea party's

not happy about the fact that everything's being decided in

the speakers office. You know, they didn't come there for the photo opp

either whether you agree with them or not.

We can find agreement on the fact that we need regular

order where everybody's got an opportunity to

offer their amendments and they have them argued and debated

and voted on. You know,

generally I talk to my republican colleagues, you know what's going to

happen next week or next week or what's gonna be in the bill

and they say, I don't know. You know, they're not included.

Ray: That's pretty discouraging. Rick: It's very discouraging. Ray: We're down to

our last few minutes and I know you wanted to talk a little bit about

aquatic invasive species cause I think you've done some work in that

area. Rick: Yeah I have. I most recently got

an extra million dollars

for a....aquatic invasive species

research. You know, we've seen here in the

Brainerd lakes area how rapidly zebra mussels

have expanded. And to the extent that that can

continues, it bodes very poorly for

you know our sport fishing. Which is such an integral

important part of our life and our economy.

We've....

gotta find ways, better ways, to

abate this. We've gotta do more research. You know, to

find ways to stop it

and limit it. And that's just one of 100 or more other

invasive species that have come in who are threatening

our tourism, our sport fishing.

You know, I don't know about what your dad but my dad always

said you know, Richard, if you think you don't have time

for fishing you're just wrong. [laughter] And I said,

how's that dad? It's cause he says, everyday someone goes fishing

adds a day to their life, it doesn't count on their span of life. Ray: Ah, that's very good

philosophy yes. Rick: And we've got to do a better job on

that. Ray: That tourism is so huge

in Minnesota. [Yeah] And the spiny water

fleas, zebra mussels, you name it...

it's exploding. It's growing and growing.

CWD in our deer. [Oh yeah]

I just talked to a friend who just came back from Montana,

22 percent of the deer tested in Montana have

CWD. [Wow] You know, it's not an invasive species

they don't really know. It's a....

it's effecting the nervous system. Rick: Some kind of a parasite. And it's threatening

the.... Ray: It's like the mad cow disease almost. Rick: Yeah, threatening the moose

population as well. [Yeah absolutely] By the way, I was just saying also

you know how important the loon is...I mean

what an iconic....

bird and symbol for the beauty of our great

lakes in northern Minnesota. Crosslake Minnesota

is busy with an initiative to create a

national loon center. Ray: Oh really? Rick: I just had lunch...yeah.

I just had lunch with the president

of the Audubon Society and believe

it or not, the loon is on their list

of 300 species

most likely to be extinct by the

end of the century. [Wow] Zebra mussels,

they have a parasite in them, there were 10,000 loons

have lost their life from zebra mussels. So...

Ray: Pretty sad. Very sad. Rick: Yeah, so we gotta get going

and so much of this involves research.

And you gotta put the money up there to do the

research to find how you abate these, how you protect our

important species. Ray: We've run out of time. Rick: Dog gone it! Ray: I appreciate

your jumping on with us and sharing some of this

information. How do people get in touch with you if they want to? Rick: You know,

just go on the web and just put in there Richard

Nolan, member of congress. Ray: Congressman eight district. Rick: Yeah.

And they can get our...we get...I get

anywhere from a 1,000 to several thousand communications every

week. [Wow] And I value it, I appreciate it. My

staff gives me a report on every single one of them.

I look forward to...that's one of the first things I do every Monday

when I come into the office is look at the correspondence. Ray: Thank

you very much for appearing on the show. Rick: Thank you, Ray. Ray: You've been watching Lakeland

Currents where we're talking about what you're talking about. I'm

Ray Gildow so long until next time.

For more infomation >> Lakeland Current 1107 - A Visit with US Congressman Rick Nolan - Duration: 28:02.

-------------------------------------------

Tips for best Formula 1 experience - US Grand Prix Edition - Duration: 10:46.

hey guys I'm back at DC on a work trip and I figured that while I'm in this

luxurious hotel on this super modern looking couch figured I'll talk about

something that I haven't mentioned before on October 21st through 24th I

actually went to Austin Texas to attend the u.s. Grand Prix actually as I was

researching and preparing to attend Formula One Grand Prix I didn't see

that much content that would explain you what the experience is like and what are

the things you should consider and I wanted to share my experience and I

think it's gonna be applicable to a lot of Grand Prix's around the world because

Formula one runs them in a very similar fashion let's get straight to it

item number one you want to make sure you get the actual tickets to the

Formula one before you take care of everything else because believe it or

not they do sell out pretty fast. My advice to all of you who are actually

not that experienced at Formula One don't go crazy with the tickets it's a

very unique experience and I would say if you're attending for the first time you

just want to get a taste of it do the general admission general admission will

allow you to walk around the circuit without the assigned seats and soak in

the spirit and the experience of the festivity which is the

Formula One Grand Prix is now as for those who are more experienced at Formula One

and consider themselves true fans I would say you do want to make sure you

get nice seats the best part of the experience when it came to our tickets

was the fact that we were sitting at the main grandstands at the start/finish

line and we were actually facing the podium so we didn't have to run out to

the track as they were preparing to award the winners of the Grand Prix if

you're very passionate about the sport and if you are ready to commit north of

300 US dollars per ticket do your research

I'll try to link some of the useful websites below but the primary purpose

of your research should be figuring out where your seats are allocated so looking

at seat maps for this particular circuit and making sure you maybe even look up

some of the videos to see what the view will be like let's move on to the next

lesson

now item number 2 on your list should be figuring out the dates you do have a

little bit of overlap with a prior conversation about buying the tickets

when you're figuring out the dates because each Formula one weekend

consists of three days there's a free practice day there is a qualification

day and there's an actual race day the race day always happens on Sunday we can

pick all three days and buy the tickets for all three days of the race because

there'll be a lot of things to do the racetrack usually has a lot of

entertainment sometimes they have free concerts like in Austin they had Justin

Timberlake which was included where the tickets just make sure you check local

event because I think from one race to the other then type of activities varies

so you want to double check but in Austin it was actually pretty cool but

because we had a kid we were not necessarily able to attend all three

days imagine for the fact you pick up to date what's important now yes if it's

your first time take one day because they come for the race day and your trip

then should be consisting of however many days you want to pad before the

actual race so whether you want to arrive on Saturday

Friday Thursday it's really up to you but for those of you who are true

enthusiasts of sport I would say stick around and come for free practice day

which is Friday or qualification which is Saturday the autograph sessions

alone if they host them at your Grand Prix I think are worth if you are into

the sport and you think you want to make the most of it come in and attend Friday

Saturday and go enjoy the race on Sunday let's go talk now about what do you need

to consider once you settle on dates

you have the dates now whether you are an amateur who just want to explore

the event for the first time or if you're a real enthusiast of sport and

you're attending every single day at least now you know what the days are next

step the balance is now between the hotel and the flights because you know

the days and trust me all the local hotel vendors know what those dates are

as well so you really want to make sure you start thinking about the lodging and

the airfare in advance when it comes to picking the hotel or airfare nuh the

advice I don't think differs that much between sports fanatics or people who

are just tagging along or wanted to check out the event for the first time

you just want to make sure you plan way in advance it's very hard for me to give

you an advice because it really depends on which dates you pick and once you pick

the dates and you know you're gonna go you bought the tickets just commit and

get the airfare and definitely make sure you take care of the hotel check out the

Airbnb check out different hotels in the air don't be afraid to book a hotel a

little bit further out of the city because at the end of day like in case

of Austin Texas the circuit is actually 25 minutes outside of the city and we

pick the hotel which was about 35 minutes outside of the city we were

actually much closer to the race circuit than the city center and it played into

the price of the hotel plus what we did we actually just rented the car

unless it is a city circuit like Singapore Monaco Baku I would strongly

advise to actually rent a car because usually those racetracks are located

outside of the city so you're gonna have to get there and trust me please trust

me you don't wanna deal too much with the public transportation because there

probably won't be much of it anyway so rent the car renting a car allows you to

go and pick a hotel a little bit further out maybe a little bit closer to the

track further out of the city but at the same time it will make your life

thousand times easier so doesn't really differ that much I don't need to do this

or this on to the next one actually quick note

on Austin itself if you are going to the u.s. Grand Prix you're going to Austin

buy parking as well in our case if would have stayed in the city center there was an

option to take a shuttle but shuttle takes about 20 to 25 minutes if there is no

traffic and on the race day believe me there's a lot of traffic it can take up

to hour and a half to get from the city into the racetrack just bite the bullet

because of the fact that you're already spending decent amount of money on

everything else and just pay for parking don't wait in Austin the tickets were

actually about a hundred bucks for one parking spot but it's parking spot for a

car so if there are four friends and each one of you spends $25 you cover the

parking spot and you make your life so much easier because now you're in

control when you're getting in when you're getting out just take into

account the travel time it's gonna be long it's gonna be frustrating and

hopefully you're gonna make sure you're not late

so yeah and I think my final advice is I really make sure you make an event out

of it and you should not be really going there just for the race because trust me

it's gonna be crazy and getting in right as everyone is trying to get in for the

first day of the race weekend which is Friday or getting out right after the

race is over which is something that the Monday morning make it last if you can

afford it do some things around the city like in our case we actually had some

nice family time at the hotel because we stayed an extra I think being a half and

it was amazing

okay that was the first attempt. He's though...that thing got away from me come back

here they actually have

a 24/7 pecan vending-machine 21st century people. I think those are the main points that I

wanted to bring to you nothing super major or crazy I think

those are very logical but I actually had a hard time I had to go in between

different resources to collect to understand what's gonna happen during

the event hopefully this video helps you a little bit more yeah feel free to ask

me more questions in the comments below find me on Twitter or Instagram have fun

you make a vacation out of it don't just come there for the race come there for

the experience well what can I say this was a very nice way to spend this lonely

evening on the work trip now this guy Tohir I'm gonna go get some rest

it's been a long week I'm looking forward to starting the Edit and

hopefully hearing your feedback and comments in this section below

hey there's a comment section and there's a subscribe button somewhere

over there don't forget about it as always thank you very much for your

attention I'll see you next time guys see ya peace! hello again this is

actually the morning after I woke up this morning feeling a particular way

and I realized why the fun fact is I actually planned to shoot the video that

I made here in DC back during the f1 weekend in Austin but for some reason I

just stopped and I kind of gave up on that video idea and I figured that you

know what maybe someday in the future I'm gonna use it for something else

coming back to yesterday and getting my head together and actually sitting down

and shooting the video made me feel so good because god it feels nice to

actually finish something thank you guys see in the next one

you

For more infomation >> Tips for best Formula 1 experience - US Grand Prix Edition - Duration: 10:46.

-------------------------------------------

WWE News - SK's take on WWE's Clash of Champions US Title Triple Threat match announcement - Duration: 5:13.

WWE News - SK's take on WWE's Clash of Champions US Title Triple Threat match announcement

As we here at Sportskeeda have already covered, WWE has announced three matches for the SmackDown Live Clash of Champions PPV, scheduled for the Sunday the 17th of December at the TD Garden in Boston, Massachusetts.

com video, SD Live Commentator Byron Saxton reported that SmackDown Womens Champion Charlotte would defend her title against Natalya and Tag Team Champions The Usos would take on The New Day as well as Shelton Benjamin and Chad Gable in a triple threat title match.

These were two matches we werent surprised to see confirmed for the Clash of Champions card, however, the third match revealed by Saxton was an unexpected one.

This out-of-nowhere match announced was a triple threat bout between US Champion Baron Corbin. Bobby Roode and, of all people, Dolph Ziggler.

Ziggler recently had feuded with Roode, which included losing to The Glorious One at the Hell in a Cell PPV back in October and in a 2-out-of-3 Falls match on the Halloween edition of SmackDown.

That was seemingly the end of this feud.

After the Survivor Series PPV, WWE started to plant the seeds for a feud between Corbin and Roode during a Kevin Owens and Sami Zayn vs. New Day Lumberjack Match, when the US Champ struck Roode in the face.

On this weeks episode of SmackDown, Roode and Corbin traded words, strongly teasing a match between each other. This was until Corbin backed down from Roode.

Hence, the WWE Universe was expecting to see the pair go at it, one-on-one, for Corbins US Championship at the Clash of Champions PPV.

So, with all due respect, why on earth has Dolph Ziggler been inserted into this Clash of Champions US Title Match?.

My view on the situation is that WWE wants Corbin to retain his US Title, but at the same time, they want Roode, a former NXT Champion who the company is apparently very high on, to be protected in defeat.

Therefore, by having Dolph in the contest, WWE can have Roode evade damage by booking Corbin to retain his Championship through pinning Ziggler and not him.

With Roode only debuting on the main roster and SmackDown back in September, any clean losses in the middle of the ring at this early stage in his WWE career, especially in a title feud, could be a momentum killer.

There is another side to the coin though. It is possible WWE want to have Roode WIN the US Title from Corbin at COC, but in a way in which Corbin is not made to look weak.

But I think WWEs plan is for Corbin to retain for now, and then have Roode win the US Title from him in a single match at the Royal Rumble PPV, i.e, at a bigger stage than Clash of Champions.

A Championship win at a Big Four PPV like the Royal Rumble would do a lot more for Roode than a Championship victory at COC.

If this is the direction they are going in, it means the company are firmly behind Bobby Roode, which may come as a shock to those who still think of Roode as n ex-TNA wrestler.

Either way, I am sure it is not Ziggler being given a push by being randomly placed in a match at Clash Of Champions. Really, he will just be WWEs Fall Guy again at the PPV, or more so Corbins.

And unfortunately for Dolph, this will be just another similar chapter to all of the other ones in the story of his WWE tenure. Another good match, but not a good result. Could this be his End of Days in the WWE?.

For more infomation >> WWE News - SK's take on WWE's Clash of Champions US Title Triple Threat match announcement - Duration: 5:13.

-------------------------------------------

U.S. Stocks Soar on Tax Cut Optimism - Duration: 0:54.

For more infomation >> U.S. Stocks Soar on Tax Cut Optimism - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

PRINCE HARRY & MEGHAN MARKLE YOU'RE ALL INVITED TO WATCH US GET HITCHED!!! 1 - Duration: 1:59.

PRINCE HARRY & MEGHAN MARKLE YOU'RE ALL INVITED TO WATCH US GET HITCHED!!! 1

Harry and Meghans wedding is still in the early planning stages, but our Kensington Palace contact tells us theyll allow cameras in St.

Georges Chapel at Windsor Castle to make it available on the tele.

Were told it will be a pool camera, meaning all media outlets can plug in and run the wedding on broadcast and cable TV as well as all digital platforms.

Heres the contest.

Around 23 million Americans and 27 million Brits tuned in to Kate and Williams wedding back in 2011.

Our guess.

Harry and Meghan will beat that, especially in America because shes one of US.

If you want to set your DVR, there are reports that the wedding will go down May 26 during Memorial Day weekend.

The precise date will be revealed next week.

For more infomation >> PRINCE HARRY & MEGHAN MARKLE YOU'RE ALL INVITED TO WATCH US GET HITCHED!!! 1 - Duration: 1:59.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: U.S. Senate Passes Major Tax Reform – Here's How It Affects You - Duration: 9:39.

Early Saturday morning, the United States Senate passed the most sweeping tax reform

in decades, which will bring a significant tax cut to both the working class and big

business.

The vote was close – 51 to 49 – with only one Republican voting against the GOP-sponsored

bill.

Fox News reports on what the reform will mean for you.

The U.S. Senate voted just before 2 a.m. ET Saturday to pass a sweeping tax overhaul worth

roughly $1.4 trillion, putting the Trump White House a big step closer to its first major

legislative victory – and many Americans closer to a tax cut.

The vote was 51-49, with Republican Bob Corker of Tennessee the only member of the GOP to

side with the Democrats in opposition.

The bill is still not yet finalized.

Saturday's vote means the Senate and House have passed similar tax reform plans, but

negotiators from both chambers will start meeting Monday to agree on a single piece

of legislation that both chambers must approve before it is sent to President Donald Trump

for his signature.

Here's how the latest legislation would affect you:

What deductions can I claim under the Senate bill that just passed?

The Senate bill does away with federal deductions for state and local income and sales taxes,

but allows deductions of up to $10,000 in local property taxes.

The legislation originally eliminated federal deduction for all state and local taxes, but

the property tax exemption was later added at the insistence of Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine,

who said she was "delighted" about the change.

What about personal deductions?

Like the House bill, the Senate bill nearly doubles the standard deduction level to $12,000

for individuals (up from $6,350) and $24,000 for couples (up from $12,700).

Any other deductions I could claim?

The Senate bill retains the current limit for the home mortgage interest deduction to

interest paid on the first $1 million of the loan.

(The House bill reduces the limit to $500,000 for new home purchases.)

The Senate version also preserves the deduction for medical expenses not covered by insurance

(the House bill does not), but ends deductions for moving expenses and tax preparation.

Why does the Senate bill allow deducting medical expenses not covered by insurance?

Because the Senate bill also repeals ObamaCare's individual mandate, while the House bill does

not.

If ObamaCare's mandate is repealed, thousands of people are expected to drop their health

insurance, raising the cost for those who decide to keep it.

And the personal exemption?

The Senate and House bills both eliminate the $4,050 personal tax exemption.

Will the tax brackets change at all?

The Senate bill keeps seven tax brackets, but reduces them to 10, 12, 22, 24, 32, 35

and 38.5 percent.

(The current brackets are 10, 15, 25, 28, 33, 35, and 39.6 percent.)

The House measure condenses seven brackets to four: 12, 25, 35 and 39.6 percent.

I own a small business.

What would this mean for me?

The Senate bill allows owners of so-called "pass-through" businesses (that is, businesses

that aren't incorporated) to deduct 23 percent of their earnings, and then pay at their personal

income tax rate on the remainder.

This issue was a key concern of Sens. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Steve Daines, R-Mont.,

both of whom announced this week that they would support the bill.

What about corporate tax rates?

Like the House bill, the Senate bill cuts the current 35 percent rate to 20 percent,

but the Senate bill calls for a one-year delay in dropping the rate.

When will tax reform take effect?

President Trump and congressional Republicans have vowed to make tax reform law before the

end of the year.

If that happens, most of the provisions would come into force on Jan. 1.

Will tax reform affect my returns for this year?

The changes will not have any impact on your taxes for 2017, which are due to the IRS by

April 17, 2018 (you get an extra 48 hours to file because the traditional April 15 due

date falls on a Sunday).

So when will the differences in the bills be hashed out?

The House will vote on a motion to go to conference on the tax bills on Monday evening.

The Senate is expected to vote on a similar measure soon after.

Congress is scheduled to adjourn for its Christmas break on Dec. 15, but House Speaker Paul Ryan

has said he will keep the House in session beyond that date if necessary to get tax reform

passed.Just when you thought you heard all you could about sexual assault allegations

these past few weeks, a BOMBSHELL was just dropped involving the queen of media, Oprah

Winfrey.

You HAVE heard of Oprah Winfrey before, right?

You know the sanctimonious liberal that had a popular talk show on television blabbering

for an hour about topics none of us cared about before launching it into a billion dollar

empire.

Yep, that's the one.

For decades, Oprah has crafted a persona of a caring and nurturing woman who supports

women making it big in the media world, but that is not who she truly is.

As it turns out, Oprah has some nasty skeletons in her closet that she has kept hidden to

keep up her squeaky-clean image to make a presidential bid in 2020.

However, someone just opened that closed closeted door, and the truth has come out about her

sex scandal that will destroy any chance of her running for president for good.

Oprah Winfrey has touted herself as a champion for women and minority causes aligning herself

with liberal elitists like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Oprah has always been a favorite of the left since she parrots the talking points they

want her to say and lulls the modern housewife into voting for progressive agendas under

the guise of empowerment.

However, these liberal women may change their opinion of Oprah after it was discovered that

she helped Harvey Weinstein in procuring potential victims, and has kept it a secret all these

years.

In a new stunning report, British actress Kadian Noble has charged the talk show queen

of failing to warn her about Weinstein's sexual deviancy and even prodded Noble to

speak with him to advance her career.

Noble claims that Winfrey also went as far as to say that she could trust Weinstein and

even praised the serial rapist alongside former supermodel Naomi Campbell knowing full well

that he would sexually assault her.

Here is more from Page Six:

An aspiring actress says Harvey Weinstein used Oprah Winfrey and Naomi Campbell to dupe

her into thinking he would help her with her career — only to use her for sex.

British actress Kadian Noble said Tuesday she was head-over-heels impressed when she

first met Weinstein at an event in London because he was hanging out with model Campbell

and had megastar Oprah "swinging off his arm."

"I thought, obviously, this man has something amazing in store for me," she said during

a teary-eyed press conference in Manhattan to discuss the sex trafficking lawsuit she

filed a day earlier against Weinstein in Manhattan federal court.

Instead, Weinstein used promises of career advancement to lure the actress to his hotel

room in Cannes, France, where he forced himself on her, she said.

"I felt completely played," she said.

Noble is the latest in a long line of actresses and models who claim Weinstein either forced

himself on them or coerced them into sex with promises of career advancement.

"Mr. Weinstein denies allegations of non-consensual sex," his spokeswoman said.

"Mr. Weinstein has further confirmed that there were never any acts of retaliation against

any women for refusing his advances."

After meeting Weinstein in London, Noble said she thought nothing of bringing her "show

reel" to his hotel room when she saw him again in Cannes in February 2014.

Once inside the hotel room, however, "he didn't seem that interested in my show reel,"

Noble said.

Instead, he began touching her while discussing hooking her up with a modeling agency in London.

"He said, 'I need to know you really like me,'" Nobel said.

"'I have all the information we need.

I just need to know you really like me.'"

The incident ended in the bathroom, where he "forced" Noble to perform sex acts

in front of the bathroom mirror, she said.

Afterward, Weinstein failed to help her with her career as promised, she said.

She blames him for destroying her acting dreams and said she has since reported her case to

the NYPD.

Noble's lawsuit claims that Weinstein's practice of luring aspiring actresses to his

casting couch with promises of career advancement makes him no better than a seedy sex trafficker.

Her lawyer, Jeff Herman, said he is hoping for "millions of dollars" in damages.

"The jury will decide what they think her damages call for," Herman said at the same

press conference.

But it will be "significant," he said.

"It will go into the millions of dollars."

It is incredibly sad to hear that another innocent woman was deceived by these horrible

predators in Hollywood.

Noble's career is shattered and her all her dreams are gone while Oprah sits on top

of an empire built on deception.

Of course, it is Weinstein's fault for what he did to this woman, but Oprah was equally

complicit and should have to pay the price for destroying a life.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét