Thứ Ba, 21 tháng 8, 2018

Auto news on Youtube Aug 21 2018

Seoul's Foreign Minister expects Washington to issue more sanctions against North Korea,

unless the regime takes practical measures towards denuclearization.

She also says South Korea's efforts to establish a liaison office with the North are in line

with international sanctions.

Kim Mok-yeon reports.

Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha has said that the U.S. is likely to continue announcing

additional sanctions on North Korea due to Washington's strong stance that sanctions

are needed to achieve Pyongyang's denuclearization.

She made the comments at the meeting of the National Assembly's Foreign Affairs and Unification

Committee on Tuesday.

When asked whether South Korea agrees with the U.S. view that Pyongyang hasn't taken

any practical steps towards denuclearization, Kang said that she thinks it is not possible

for the two allies to completely share the same perspective, adding that despite this,

they are closely cooperating to share information on each others' situation.

Regarding concerns that Seoul could undermine international sanctions on the regime especially

through the establishment of an inter-Korean liaison office in North Korea, Kang said that

the liaison office is clearly not a violation of global sanctions, stressing that Washington

shares the same thought.

Unification minister Cho Myoung-gyon , who was also present at the meeting... went one

step further, claiming the establishment of the office could rather boost Pyongyang's

disarmament.

Concerning the upcoming inter-Korean summit expected to be held in September,... the unification

minister said that the ministry is still working to set a final date as soon as possible, and

spoke of hopes that the talks could bring peace and prosperity to the Korean peninsula.

Kim Mok-yeon, Arirang news.

For more infomation >> U.S. will continue issuing sanctions until N. Korea takes action on denuclearization.. - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

Inter-Korean relations and denuclearization must move forward together: U.S. State Department - Duration: 0:53.

The U.S. State Department stands firm on its position that inter-Korean ties must move

forward in step with Pyongyang's denuclearization process.

A State Department official, responding to an enquiry by South Korea's Yonhap News Agency,

said the U.S. is aware that the two Koreas plan to open a joint liaison office in Kaesong.

The official did not comment on whether the project would be against the sanctions on

North Korea, but said that the restrictions remain valid until the complete denuclearization

of the regime.

The U.S. response comes after Seoul's top office rejected claims that opening an inter-Korean

liaison office at the Kaesong Industrial Complex violates international sanctions.

The State Department also said the two Koreas' road modernization project needs to go hand

in hand with Pyongyang's denuclearization process, according to VOA on Tuesday.

For more infomation >> Inter-Korean relations and denuclearization must move forward together: U.S. State Department - Duration: 0:53.

-------------------------------------------

State gubernatorial candidates square off at business forum - Duration: 1:56.

For more infomation >> State gubernatorial candidates square off at business forum - Duration: 1:56.

-------------------------------------------

Georgia State officer, suspect exchange gunfire on campus - Duration: 0:23.

For more infomation >> Georgia State officer, suspect exchange gunfire on campus - Duration: 0:23.

-------------------------------------------

Conversation with Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden & Archivist of the United States David Ferriero - Duration: 46:54.

>> From the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C.

>> Please welcome to our stage, Carla Hayden and David Ferriero.

[ Music ]

[ Clapping ]

>> Carla Hayden: Well --

>> David Ferriero: How have you been?

>> Carla Hayden: We call ourselves partners in crime.

>> David Ferriero: We are though we're not going to talk

about the crime part of it, right?

[Laughter] We're just going to talk about the partner part.

>> Carla Hayden: Well, what's been really interesting

since I've been in the position

of Library [inaudible] is the fact that people ask me well,

what does the National Archives do?

You know --

>> David Ferriero: What do you mean?

What does that mean?

>> Carla Hayden: What does the archivist do?

You're the Library of Congress.

And then this -- there's a confusion about the histories

and the roles of each of the institutions.

And I've learned a lot in that even about the tank coming

up to reclaim the Declaration of Independence,

the Bill of Rights, and was there a third?

>> David Ferriero: We call it the Constitution.

[ Laughter ]

>> Carla Hayden: That were held by the Library of Congress

and that type of thing.

So could you --

>> David Ferriero: Well you got an earlier start than we did.

It wasn't until the 1930s

that the United States got serious about its record.

And it was Franklin Roosevelt who was passionate about records

that we actually created the --

he signed the legislation that created the National Archives.

The charters that Carla is referring to had been

in the custody of the State Department and then

at the Library of Congress.

And when the Archives building was built,

a beautiful tabernacle was created

for the Declaration of Independence.

Doors opened in 1935 but the librarian of Congress refused

to release the Declaration.

[ Laughter ]

And I've held that against you [laughter] ever since.

>> Carla Hayden: I wasn't born then

but I knew this was going to happen.

>> David Ferriero: And it wasn't until Harry Truman came

into office that he, you know, kind of laid down the law

with the new librarian of Congress that they really needed

to deliver that document where it belonged.

So as Carla describes it, it was a really military ceremony

with tanks and military people lining the steps of the --

and she claims she always describes it as a grab

for the Declaration [laughter] but it --

>> Carla Hayden: Tanks literally --

>> David Ferriero: -- was the only transfer of the document

to its rightful place.

>> Carla Hayden: And we have photographs.

Photographs --

>> David Ferriero: We do.

>> Carla Hayden: -- of the people.

The tanks with the -- what are those?

>> David Ferriero: Howitzers.

>> Carla Hayden: Yes.

[Laughter] Right there waiting and you can imagine the curators

and the librarians thinking well maybe it's time.

And who was the librarian of the Congress then?

Do you remember?

>> David Ferriero: Oh I forget.

Someone here must remember.

>> Carla Hayden: Someone here.

Winston Tab is here.

He is my check on all the time.

>> David Ferriero: Oh Winston.

You were here.

What was the --

[ Laughter ]

>> Carla Hayden: But that was the start of the kind

of clarification of roles and to really divide up things.

>> David Ferriero: The Archives was created to collect

and protect and made available the records

of the United States government.

So anything that was created by the government.

So the question -- the natural question is what about the stuff

that was created before 1934 when the legislation was signed?

A lot of it is in our custody.

Some of it is at the Library of Congress.

Since the materials were stored in attics and basements all

over town, a lot of it was lost through the fire and theft

and flood but what we have now is a dividing line

between everything the government creates

and that's me, and everything they don't create which is you.

>> Carla Hayden: And sometimes I like to --

and there are times when I'm glad you're you.

[Laughter] I've learned that.

>> David Ferriero: And there are times when I wish I were you.

[ Laughter ]

>> Carla Hayden: And I've described it in another way too

that for instance, Truman and his official records might be

with the Truman Library and I'd really like to get

into those things too with the Presidential Libraries and some

of the letters that he wrote to his family.

So the person is where you might -- the things that the person,

the diaries, all of the things like that, the personal part

and the personal life of an official might be

at the Library of Congress.

And so the papers of 23 presidents

from George Washington to Coolidge are

at the Library of Congress.

And we were both in Starkville, Mississippi.

>> David Ferriero: Starkville, Mississippi,

where Ulysses S. Grant is still probably revolving in his grave

through [multiple speakers].

>> Carla Hayden: And the Abraham Lincoln.

>> David Ferriero: Yes.

>> Carla Hayden: Collection.

>> David Ferriero: Ulysses S. Grant Presidential Library --

>> Carla Hayden: Library is in Starkville.

>> David Ferriero: At -- in Mississippi.

Can you believe it?

>> Carla Hayden: And we were there.

>> David Ferriero: We were.

>> Carla Hayden: And [multiple speakers].

>> David Ferriero: It turns out there are more

than 200 Presidential sites around the country.

People beyond the Library of Congress

and the National Archives who have some kind of responsibility

for some aspect of a President's life and they're all meeting

in Washington in August.

>> Carla Hayden: And what's interesting

about the Presidential Libraries,

the Library of Congress has custody of the actual papers

and documents of Ulysses S. Grant and what some

of the Presidential Libraries do is what they will collect

and make copies of things from different collections

about a President and put them in [inaudible].

>> David Ferriero:

Those Presidential cites, that's right.

Yes.

>> Carla Hayden: Place and that's how the --

some of the Presidential Libraries have --

been established.

>> David Ferriero: So when Franklin Roosevelt created the

National Archives, he also decided

to have a Presidential Library.

So technically his was the first --

I'm convinced he was a closet archivist.

He was really passionate about his papers

and understood the importance of archives.

Spent a lot of time hiring the first archivist and spent a lot

of time supporting that first archivist,

Robert Connor [phonetic], in his work as he was trying to figure

out where the records are, and more importantly,

to convince the agency heads to give up their records

because that wasn't something

that people were interested in doing.

So Roosevelt created his own library or Herbert --

whoever decided he wanted a library at that point

but this was all voluntary.

It was all voluntary up until 1972 when thanks

to President Nixon and his thoughts

that he owned his own records that legislation was passed,

the Presidential Records Act,

which made it government property.

So 1972 is kind of our marker for you have to donate.

You have to give your papers to the National Archive.

>> Carla Hayden: And so the role really became official then.

>> David Ferriero: Yeah.

>> Carla Hayden: And then the other departments

and that's another confusion that happens sometimes.

>> David Ferriero: Well it's a separate set of laws.

Presidential Records Act was 1972.

The Federal Records Act was created much earlier than that.

And that guides all of the records management activities

for the Executive Branch.

So all of the 275 Executive Branch Cabinet level

and agencies and departments.

>> Carla Hayden: What about congressional records

of [multiple speakers] --

>> David Ferriero: We provide

by a gentleman's agreement way back when,

we provide courtesy storage for the records

of Congress and service them.

They are the records of Congress but they aren't

at the Library of Congress.

>> Carla Hayden: And you --

and I want all of the people watching and listening

to realize that the joy of working with your colleagues.

Some that you've known.

I've known David his time at New York Public and all of that,

is that you have this kind of friendly,

kind of historical whatever competition.

[Laughter] So when you talk about your --

>> David Ferriero: And some grudges.

Still carrying --

>> Carla Hayden: And grudges.

>> David Ferriero: -- some grudges.

[Laughter]

>> Carla Hayden: So when you talk about

and I know you've seen that movie, National Treasure.

>> David Ferriero: Yes.

>> Carla Hayden: You got all the kids.

>> David Ferriero: Yes.

>> Carla Hayden: And they're doing it but the Library

of Congress has that first printing

that just had John Hancock on it.

And then they send it out.

>> David Ferriero: It wouldn't have been that first printing

if those original signors didn't sign something.

>> Carla Hayden: See.

[ Laughter ]

And --

>> David Ferriero: Which I have.

>> Carla Hayden: And David Ferriero --

[laughter] right, right, okay.

It's okay.

It's okay.

And the Gettysburg Address, you know, that he took on the field.

>> David Ferriero: That's right.

>> Carla Hayden: The contents

of Abraham Lincoln's pockets the night he was assassinated.

>> David Ferriero: [Inaudible] I know.

>> Carla Hayden: Four locks of Thomas Jefferson's hair.

[ Laughter ]

Just saying.

[Laughter] You know, so there is kind of fun to have this kind

of historical back and forth with people.

Oh those Tony Marks [phonetic].

He's got a few artifacts too at New York Public.

>> David Ferriero: Yeah.

The [inaudible] stolen from the Vatican by Napoleon.

>> Carla Hayden: Okay.

>> David Ferriero: Yeah.

>> Carla Hayden: There are a few things over there.

So everybody's -- and let's not even bring up Hamilton, right?

[Laughter] Let's -- okay let's bring up Hamilton.

[Inaudible] how did you pull that off?

>> David Ferriero: We have Hamilton's --

oh it's through the New York Public Library actually.

Tommy Kale [phonetic] [laughter] who was the Director

of Hamilton was a member of the Library

for the Performing Arts Visiting Committee.

And he and I became good friends and when we decided

to honor Ron [inaudible]

and Lynn Manuel [phonetic] it was through Tommy Kale --

>> Carla Hayden: Oh was that really good.

>> David Ferriero: -- we got all three of them in house.

Yes.

>> Carla Hayden: Well, we're not going to name drop.

Okay.

>> David Ferriero: Not at all.

>> Carla Hayden: We're just going to let that go.

>> David Ferriero: Not at all.

>> Carla Hayden: We're going to let that go.

>> David Ferriero: But we do have Hamilton's Oath

of Allegiance signed at Valley Forge by George Washington.

>> Carla Hayden: And [laughter] we just digitized the last note

to his wife, Eliza.

[ Laughter ]

[ Inaudible ]

>> David Ferriero: Not yet.

[ Laughter ]

>> Carla Hayden: It's so much fun.

And then you get Tony on the side --

>> David Ferriero: We have [inaudible]

to the government outlining her poverty asking for support

from the federal government.

>> Carla Hayden: And we just are finishing digitizing all

of her correspondence of the rest of her life

when she did his -- and made -- unburnished his reputation.

>> David Ferriero: Yeah.

>> Carla Hayden: So we could go on.

>> David Ferriero: What else are you doing in the digitization?

>> Carla Hayden: We can go on.

>> David Ferriero: Okay.

>> Carla Hayden: You just name a historical figure.

If they were official, that's what you have though.

>> David Ferriero: That's right.

So what are you doing in --

what are we doing together in the digitization?

>> Carla Hayden: Well, we are doing some cool stuff.

Why don't you tell them a little bit about that?

>> David Ferriero: We're working on the Terrific Exhibit

with the BNF tracing the French role in the American Revolution.

Working with, I think you guys are involved

in the New York Public Library.

>> Carla Hayden: New York Public's very involved.

>> David Ferriero: The BNF, Library of Congress, and the --

>> Carla Hayden: And the BNF, just in case people --

>> David Ferriero: And another project

with the British Library, George --

>> Carla Hayden: The two Georges.

>> David Ferriero: Two Georges about the beginnings

of this country, King George and our King George.

>> Carla Hayden: We're calling it the two Georges

because it's their George, George the Third,

and George Washington.

And the cool thing about it is that they were reading some

of the same books at the same time.

They had similar interests and so it'll be a joint exhibit

with the Royal Archives.

>> David Ferriero: That's right.

>> Carla Hayden: Windsor.

We didn't go to the wedding

but [laughter] our research timing didn't coincide

but the Royal Archives, Kings College,

and William and Mary here.

So that type of collaboration happens all the time

and we keep -- and we mentioned Tony Marks and New York Public

because in terms of a public library that has a collection

that complements some of the things that we're involved in.

New York Public is the library that we work closely

with in different ways.

So the burning question that people have asked me already

and it came up at a session, one of the sessions, what do we do

and how do we deal with technology going forward?

Some of the historical records now are going to be

in a different format.

>> David Ferriero: They already are.

>> Carla Hayden: And you've been really on the forefront of that

with your -- you were putting a hard stop

on collecting in analog.

>> David Ferriero: I'm sure you've read in the press

about the President's Reform Plan

that was just issued last week.

If you go to page 103, you'll see a two page description

of the National Archives contribution

to that reform plan.

And what it spells out is the message

that we've already delivered to the agencies

that we are no longer accepting paper at the end of 2022.

They have until 2022 to get their paper to us.

That they -- that's in their custody now that is scheduled

to be transferred but after 2022, it's digital only.

So the agencies have already been prepared for this.

They've already -- many of them 85% of them

about have been already digitizing their records.

So we're in pretty good shape that way

but the most important factor is

that those agencies are already creating their records

electronically and they have been for some time.

So this is not, you know, a great surprise, a great shock.

And just a data point, since I know there are some people

who are confused about what's going on with the Obama --

the planning for the Obama Library.

It turns out that more than 80%

of the Obama records are born digital.

There is no paper equivalent.

So the plan is with the agreement

of the Obama Foundation that we will create the first all

digital Presidential library.

The money would have been invested

in creating a physical facility in Chicago is going

to be devoted to digitization of that 15%

that isn't already digital.

And that's, you know, a very different model

for Presidential libraries.

It's a very different model for how we deliver information

and service the Presidential records

but it's an exciting opportunity for us

to rethink a whole new way of communicating,

connecting with our users.

>> Carla Hayden: Are you going to be borrowing some techniques

from museums and things in terms of how you display --

>> David Ferriero: The plan is

that the foundation has already designed

and will build a museum.

And we will loan to them artifacts

because the Presidential libraries are a combination

of paper or film, photographs, and lots of artifacts,

gifts from foreign heads of state,

gifts from the American people, more macaroni pictures

than you've ever seen in your life.

[Laughter]

>> Carla Hayden: The things from children.

>> David Ferriero: Yes.

>> Carla Hayden: Hopefully.

>> David Ferriero: Oh yeah.

Yeah. Yeah.

>> Carla Hayden: Okay.

>> David Ferriero: Every one

of the Presidential libraries has this kind of collection.

So those are the kinds of things that will end

up in the museum part of the --

>> Carla Hayden: What about letters from young people?

>> David Ferriero: That's part of --

those are all digitized now.

>> Carla Hayden: Oh that's going --

>> David Ferriero: They're all digitized.

>> Carla Hayden: to be very cool --

>> David Ferriero: Yeah.

>> Carla Hayden: -- to see all the letters

and I know that's a big part.

>> David Ferriero: Well that's important to me

because when I became the archivist and met

with the Directors of the Presidential libraries

for the first time that Director of the Kennedy handed me a copy

of a letter that a kid wrote to the President asking

for information about the proposed Peace Corps.

And it's a letter from me.

[ Laughter ]

Two weeks later the Eisenhower called

to say they had found two letters from me

to President Eisenhower and when I visited the LBJ Library they

gave me a copy of the letter that I sent

to LBJ congratulating him for signing the Civil Rights Act.

>> Carla Hayden: David,

you've been working on this for a while.

[ Laughter ]

[ Clapping ]

That is cool.

[ Clapping ]

>> David Ferriero: So I'm sure you've heard

about our sleepovers and one

of the activities during our sleepovers is an opportunity

for the kids to write a letter to the President.

And we deliver those letters to the President

on the next Monday morning.

And the White House then supplies us with a letter

that we can send back to them thanking the kids

for their interests and some words of encouragement signed

by the President which is a pretty nice touch.

>> Carla Hayden: And I must tell you,

there have been wonderful moments and things

that have been challenging but one

of the most challenging has been trying to figure

out as a former children's library, right?

How I can top this wonderful thing that you do

with children in the Archives?

They sleepover by the Constitution, right?

[ Laughter ]

In that wonderful place, there they are.

It's night and they're spooky

and they're all really having fun.

And then the next morning and I've heard

so many people tell me this, you know the Archivist

of the United States makes pancakes

for the kids the next day.

[Laughter] So now I don't worry --

we have Thomas Jefferson's recipe for macaroni

and cheese [inaudible].

I'm trying to get David and David --

>> David Ferriero: She has been trying to horn into this event

since she arrived [inaudible].

>> Carla Hayden: [Laughter] And this is really true

because I have -- I said okay,

maybe we can make a progressive weekend.

>> David Ferriero: A progressive sleepover.

>> Carla Hayden: See he knows.

[Laughter] I've got him -- at least you're saying it, David.

[Laughter] Right?

Don't you think that'd be neat?

So we have a new gang of three, you know, in Washington.

They have gangs of four and five and eight, everything.

So there's a new gang in town, it's the gang of three.

It's David Skorton, David Ferriero, and Carla Hayden.

And we, the Smithsonian, the Archives, and the Library,

and we've actually met and we talk about this.

And we might have what if the kids started

out at the Natural History Museum, right?

With all that stuff and then [laughter] I think

that would be -- or they slept there because I think, you know,

that's -- and so we're trying to figure this out.

And I think evenings should be with us

with the macaroni and cheese.

>> David Ferriero: I think Air and Space, I think Air

and Space already does a sleepover.

>> Carla Hayden: See.

>> David Ferriero: See.

>> Carla Hayden: See we're working together now.

>> David Ferriero: But you did the mention the fact

that David Skorton, that's an important thing --

>> Carla Hayden: Yes.

>> David Ferriero: -- thing that we should talk about.

And that is the close working relationship that the three

of us had which is unlike --

>> Carla Hayden: Any --

>> David Ferriero: You know, I've been there

for eight years almost nine years and this is the first time

that the three institutions have really gotten serious

about working together.

>> Carla Hayden: And it's fun because when --

and so I invited the two Davids over to the Library

of Congress for the luncheon.

And of course, our curators and librarians put

out the good silver, we call it.

You know, all of our stuff, right?

And they're in there.

And we knew that this David was opera buff.

So we had one of our music librarians bring

out this wonderful -- these just opera things that --

tell them some of the stuff because you know.

I don't --

>> David Ferriero: It was the first printing

of the first liberto for an opera.

>> Carla Hayden: Right.

>> David Ferriero: Which I had never --

I've never even heard of which was [inaudible].

>> Carla Hayden: He had never heard of it.

And then David Skorton is a jazz fanatic.

So we brought out the Billie Strayhorn things

that we had just gotten and all the Jelly Roll Morton.

And then the curator was so good, he knew opera and jazz.

>> David Ferriero: And could sing it.

>> Carla Hayden: So he was --

>> David Ferriero: And he sang --

>> Carla Hayden: And he sang.

[Inaudible] Plus we had the chicken salad thing

and all that.

It was very nice.

It was very nice.

And so this curator had a piece by Jelly Roll Morton

who is known for jazz that bridge the two types of music

because Jelly Roll Morton did an operetta or --

>> David Ferriero: That's right.

That's right.

>> Carla Hayden: --

did something and so he just slid right into that.

Now David Skorton and I think we can reveal this,

wanted to get the card of the curator.

>> David Ferriero: Oh yes.

>> Carla Hayden: So there is some poaching [inaudible].

>> David Ferriero: He was trying to steal the curator.

>> Carla Hayden: Right there.

>> David Ferriero: Right in front of her.

>> Carla Hayden: [Laughter] Right in front of me.

>> David Ferriero: How long have you been here?

Are you happy here?

>> Carla Hayden: Are you happy?

[ Laughter ]

Yes he's happy.

And I had to talk to the guy --

>> David Ferriero: Yeah, you told him he was happy.

>> Carla Hayden: Yeah.

I had to talk to the guy afterwards.

So are you happy?

So that kind of -- but it's really a lot of fun

when you start joining forces.

>> David Ferriero: Yeah but the pressure.

See we're doing the next one.

We're doing the next lunch.

>> Carla Hayden: I'm afraid.

>> David Ferriero: And the pressure is already

on about what are we going to show you.

>> Carla Hayden: And that's the really cool stuff

because women suffrage is coming up and you have a lot

of things and Smithsonian.

We're doing an exhibit.

We even talked about it as you mentioned Air and Space Museum.

You have for the Wright Brothers some pretty cool things.

>> David Ferriero: The Wright Brothers patent.

Yes.

>> Carla Hayden: The patent.

And the Library of Congress has the actual papers.

>> David Ferriero: That's right.

>> Carla Hayden: David McCullough did his book

on the Wright Brothers was really based on that.

And then the Smithsonian has the plane.

>> David Ferriero: The model.

Yeah.

>> Carla Hayden: Yeah.

>> David Ferriero: Yeah.

>> Carla Hayden: And so we're really working

to see what are some of the things that we have that each

of us can bring together for special exhibits

to really put things when one is having an exhibit on something,

put something about it in our own institution.

>> David Ferriero: That's right.

>> Carla Hayden: And the Smithsonian we were

very pleased.

We went halvies [phonetic] to purchase the first photo,

known photo, of Harriet Tubman.

And it's going to be exhibited in the new -- we digitized it,

took care of it, and it's going to be on exhibit

at the new Museum of African American History

in College Town.

>> David Ferriero: That's great.

>> Carla Hayden: So that type of --

[clapping] And you'll see more of it.

Now we'll still have the friendly rivalry.

It's always fun.

And when Tony comes to play and puts his thing down there

and all of that but just getting this community of history

and culture seems to be growing.

And we work together for that.

>> David Ferriero: So what has surprised you about --

>> Carla Hayden: At the Library of Congress?

>> David Ferriero: About working in Washington?

>> Carla Hayden: Oh.

[ Laughter ]

And Tony's over here going don't say anything.

Tony's like [inaudible].

I still live in Baltimore and --

>> David Ferriero: That says it all.

>> Carla Hayden: -- I commute.

>> David Ferriero: That says it all.

>> Carla Hayden: No, no, no, I commute

and it's really interesting because I've lived in other --

when I lived in Chicago, there's so many commuters that came in.

People would come into Chicago from Gary, Indiana, every day.

And so this idea that people come in from different states,

different places every day and I'm taking the train now.

And you just see how many people come in to the city

and then it goes -- it's like elastic.

And I didn't get a sense of that before.

You know, you go in and you think no, there are people

who live there and it grows.

And it really expands.

And how many -- and there's an energy there that's similar

to New York where you go into New York

and you just feel a pace and it changes.

And that's why when I go back to Baltimore it's like, you know,

we have the Baltimore [inaudible] and it's different.

>> David Ferriero: It's --

>> Carla Hayden: It's --

>> David Ferriero: And there are a lot of young people

in [inaudible] which is really --

>> Carla Hayden: And they all walk fast

and they have [laughter] two or three devices.

>> David Ferriero: Yeah.

>> Carla Hayden: And they're just --

>> David Ferriero: But they're all smart.

And they're all passionate about what they're doing and --

>> Carla Hayden: Yeah.

>> David Ferriero: It's really rewarding --

>> Carla Hayden: The brain --

>> David Ferriero: -- to work with them.

>> Carla Hayden: -- power --

>> David Ferriero: Yeah.

>> Carla Hayden: -- there is something.

And so the Library of Congress --

oh, you probably already do it.

>> David Ferriero: Probably.

What is it?

Another idea you've stolen from us?

>> Carla Hayden: Yes.

[Laughter] Because we're going to talk briefly about one

and in the public citizen archivist

and the citizen historian because that is really cool.

So we're working on -- here you have in Washington, D.C.,

literally some of the brightest,

smartest young people you will ever ever meet.

And they are just -- some look like they're 12 years old.

[Laughter] And they are policy --

I mean they're just something.

And so we have tried to think

of how can we get these young millennials

or they're not even millennials, some of them.

>> David Ferriero: Right.

>> Carla Hayden: They're --

engaged because they are so smart.

So they want to do -- so we've had scavenger hunts

and a little Jeopardy and some really cool things

to engage them.

We have libation sometimes and things

like that but they -- yes.

Thomas Jefferson was a wine connoisseur.

[ Laughter ]

You know, we work it.

To get these young people engaged in things

because they want to still learn.

A lot of them are coming from these colleges and they're right

out of college and they're -- you know still in Georgetown

and they're doing all this stuff.

So they will sit and listen to someone talk about something

or author or something.

They will.

And they want to meet people.

One young congressional staffer said, you know, we're --

you know our salaries might, you know, we're here.

And so this is like date night.

They -- to go and do something kind

of just [inaudible] in the summer.

Free popcorn.

How about that?

[Laughter] Big screen --

>> David Ferriero: Ooh, free popcorn.

>> Carla Hayden: -- on the lawn.

With the machine.

It's not just --

>> David Ferriero: Oh my God with a machine too.

>> Carla Hayden: With the machine.

[Laughter] With the machine free popcorn and so then they get

to see -- oh I think we might have you a little bit on that.

>> David Ferriero: No I don't think so.

>> Carla Hayden: Wait a minute.

Okay. Wait a minute.

>> David Ferriero: Let me talk about the Young Founders.

>> Carla Hayden: Not fundraising.

>> David Ferriero: This is an idea that I took

from New York Public Library, the Young Lions.

A similar kind of group really interested in the library.

Been in existence for what?

Twenty-five years or so.

Some fun day an award, fiction award for a young author.

And so I took that idea to the New York --

to the National Archives and we have a group, similar group

that we're working with, the Young Founders Society trying

to engage them in the life of the National Archives.

This is a group of folks who are drawn in all kinds

of different directions.

So getting them to focus has been the challenge but --

>> Carla Hayden: We don't have a name yet.

>> David Ferriero: Oh well.

>> Carla Hayden: So we're working on that.

I like Young Founders because then you feel --

>> David Ferriero: Well it's already been taken.

>> Carla Hayden: I know.

I'm saying this is -- but that's the good thing.

>> David Ferriero: Yeah.

>> Carla Hayden: So we are working

on how we can get this group and it's going

to be really though -- actually it's the same group

of kids -- or young people.

>> David Ferriero: Probably.

Probably.

>> Carla Hayden: That will be going

to these types of things and that --

>> David Ferriero: Well, if you have any literature you want me

to share with my group I'll --

>> Carla Hayden: Well let's talk

about your citizen archivist because that one --

>> David Ferriero: Sure.

>> Carla Hayden: -- we just took almost verbatim

and made it citizen historian

because of the transcription and things.

>> David Ferriero: So when I was hired in 2009 by President Obama

and on his first day in office, he told his senior staff

that the government doesn't have all the answers and we need

to figure out ways to engage the American public

in solving some of those problems.

And I took that to heart and worked with the staff to think

about ways that we could engage the American public

in the work that we do.

And the result of that was the creation

of the citizen archivist dashboard which has a number

of activities that you can help us do our work.

Tagging photographs.

Identifying this is become fairly standard now,

identifying people in places in photographs.

But I think the centerpiece, the thing I'm most excited

about is the transcription project that we have going

on where we've loaded thousands of records.

Kids aren't being taught [inaudible].

>> Carla Hayden: Cursive.

>> David Ferriero: [Inaudible] or -- in schools.

>> Carla Hayden: Definitely not [inaudible].

>> David Ferriero: [Laughter] And I have billions

of records in cursive.

So we're, you know,

disenfranchising an entire generation

and future generations because they can read this stuff.

So we have people all over the country and actually all

over the world who are helping us transcribe

in this citizen archivist dashboard activity.

So that's a way that we're trying to engage the public

in helping do our work.

>> Carla Hayden: And we just put citizen historian and took it

because the model is so great.

And there is the same need at the Library of Congress.

>> David Ferriero: That's right.

>> Carla Hayden: Susan B. Anthony's papers.

All these people.

Frederick Douglas.

Some of the things that are in cursive

that literally young people and because of the writing,

sometimes other people can't read these documents.

So the Library of Congress is launching citizen historian

and we even reference and say it started

with the National Archives, citizen archivist

because we want people that are doing one to think

about doing the other too.

>> David Ferriero: Well and we're also working together

on are history hub site where we're --

our reference folks are sharing, collaborating --

>> Carla Hayden: Right.

>> David Ferriero: -- and providing reference service

to anyone who has a particular reference question.

We're fielding and sharing information

from our own collections to solve the research needs

of the people who are using history hub.

So that's another -- and we're bringing the Smithsonian

on board with that also.

>> Carla Hayden: Right.

>> David Ferriero: And I noticed that your folks were

at the National Archives last week

for an editathon [phonetic], a Wikipedia editathon.

>> Carla Hayden: Yes.

>> David Ferriero: So we're working together on Wikipedia.

>> Carla Hayden: Yeah, working together.

And I also want to share what I know we've talked

about a little bit.

The concern about history going forward

and records being created digitally and how we deal

with storage issues, security, technology,

keeping up in the future, and there's real concern at time.

That future historians how will get these items

as history's being made in a different format.

>> David Ferriero: It's the one thing --

of all the things that keep me up at night, this is the one --

>> Carla Hayden: That's the one.

>> David Ferriero: -- that keeps me up at night.

Yeah. It's ensuring that, you know, our mandate is to ensure

that people have access to the records in perpetuity

and you know, we're barely able to guarantee that in paper

but being able to guarantee

that in the electronic environment is our

biggest challenge.

>> Carla Hayden: Is --

>> David Ferriero: And I always have in the back

of my head the work that Nicholson Baker did

in a book entitled Double Fold.

>> Carla Hayden: Yes.

>> David Ferriero: Where he chastised us

for microfilming all of those early American newspapers

and throwing out the originals.

And leaving us in a situation where here

in the United States we did not have copies

of our own newspapers.

>> Carla Hayden: That's right.

>> David Ferriero: Because the microfilm was --

and the microfilm is so poorly created and disintegrated

in some cases but there was no --

in lots of reels no quality control.

So the images weren't perfect and the worst thing was

that many of the -- The New York Herald was the first, I believe,

newspaper to introduce color

into the comics on Sunday editions.

And the newspaper microfilm is black and white.

So we lost the whole sense of our history in a flawed project.

>> Carla Hayden: And that --

>> David Ferriero: But I am happy to report Nicholson Baker,

the month that the book came out,

Nicholson Baker's book came out, the librarian community,

of course, have circled the wagons

and Nicholson is our enemy.

[Laughter] And I was opening a new storage facility

at Duke University and I needed a speaker.

And I invited Nick to come and be our speaker to open

because here is this warehouse of paper.

Isn't this wonderful, Nick?

And we had dinner -- Nick had raised the money

from his borrowing from in-laws to buy

from the British Library the only paper copies that existed.

The British Library was [inaudible] them.

And Nick bought them and setup a warehouse in New Hampshire.

He became a newspaper librarian and was providing photographs

and things, scanned images from this collection.

So and I invited Nick to be our speaker.

He came. We had dinner.

And I told him when you get tired of newspaper librarian,

this wonderful new facility

that you just dedicated would be a great place to house them.

And so those newspapers are at Duke University now.

>> Carla Hayden: Right.

>> David Ferriero: Thank God.

So I always have that in my mind when I'm thinking

about what we're dealing

with with this electronic information.

So that we don't get into the position

where we've lost everything

because of the security things --

>> Carla Hayden: Sure.

>> David Ferriero: Technology, all kinds of issues.

>> Carla Hayden: And the security thing

that becomes even more of an issue with the technology.

The Library of Congress, for instance, has storage modules

and they are modules but think Amazon

and what those warehouses look

like in Fort Meade, military base.

[Inaudible] that.

The electronic environment in terms of security

and making those transitions as technology progresses.

So there's that fiscal part that's a major challenge too.

>> David Ferriero: Exactly and we're doing a lot of work

with the industry to educate them about what the needs are

around tools that -- for, in my case, the agencies need

to create and maintain their records.

The situation in the federal government is very much the

situation that I remember from the university settings

where every agency -- I mean every faculty was able to go off

and build their own system or buy something off the shelf.

And there was no interoperability.

There was no enterprise approach to technology

and that is clearly the description

of the federal government that --

>> Carla Hayden: So each department --

>> David Ferriero: Yeah.

>> Carla Hayden: -- has its own way --

>> David Ferriero: Right.

>> Carla Hayden: -- of sealing [inaudible].

>> David Ferriero: So the state

of information technology infrastructure is not

where it should be and that's another issue that's outlined

in the reform plan.

Another point that is in support of the work

that we're trying to do.

>> Carla Hayden: What about the resources to keep up?

>> David Ferriero: Well that's -- yeah.

How's your budget?

>> Carla Hayden: Ah.

[Laughter] Well the technology, it actually been very supported

in terms of the technology effort and bringing the Library

of Congress to be a modern and very efficient.

And that's been very heartening coming in and seeing that

and having that kind of support.

And you know, that you have to maintain it

and also the staffing that you need to have

that digital strategy that's going to be able

to look forward and keep going.

So we just hired a digital strategy manager and are going

to do more with that because we have to.

We have to look at and also look back at the same time.

>> David Ferriero: Exactly.

>> Carla Hayden: So it's a fun time in a lot of ways because --

>> David Ferriero: You should -- we should actually put that --

>> Carla Hayden: -- we're getting a lot of people

from the technology sector that are coming into the library

to work and to help us to try to solve some of these things.

And that's brought a --

some energy and some cross fertilization.

That's been real exciting for us.

>> David Ferriero: That's something we should put

on our agenda for the three of us when we --

>> Carla Hayden: The technology.

And we even had and I referred back to Tony.

One of his -- he hired someone

from Great Britain to come over --

>> David Ferriero: BBC.

>> Carla Hayden: The BBC.

That is a technology digital guru and we had him come

to the Library of Congress and talk to our staff

about what New York Public is doing.

They're -- we're a little jealous of some of the stuff

but they're doing a lot of cool things.

And we had him come.

So just this cross fertilization between institutions,

between types of libraries, archives, has been, I think,

helpful for us to share and say hey we have common problems

and what could we do together.

Now the -- we have the young professionals.

We have the children.

Are you working on things for seniors?

>> David Ferriero: Things for seniors.

>> Carla Hayden: Oh good.

[ Laughter ]

>> David Ferriero: Yeah we're planning a sleepover for --

>> Carla Hayden: No --

[ Laughter ]

[ Clapping ]

Well we have a wonderful partnership

with AARP, I must say.

They've supported the Book Festival and some other things.

And --

>> David Ferriero: We have a lot of support from them also.

>> Carla Hayden: I know you do

but what can we do to engage seniors?

And as I'm mature, that becomes a particular interest as well.

>> David Ferriero: We do have --

it's been interesting to watch this transcription project

because there are a number

of senior centers and nursing homes.

There's a nursing home in Lynn, Massachusetts who has adopted us

and is doing transcriptions.

>> Carla Hayden: Yes.

>> David Ferriero: Which I think is wonderful.

>> Carla Hayden: And see that's in terms of retired professors

and people that want to keep engaged.

>> David Ferriero: Yeah.

>> Carla Hayden: And because you can do it remotely

that with limited mobility with a lot of seniors.

This is a way that they can keep involved and keep that

but we're going to have -- I won't even -- well I can --

>> David Ferriero: What are you doing?

>> Carla Hayden: About cooking to --

>> David Ferriero: Macaroni and cheese.

>> Carla Hayden: Stay tuned.

>> David Ferriero: Probably.

>> Carla Hayden: Stay tuned.

The Library of Congress has one

of the world's largest collections

of historical cookbooks.

So imagine what programming you could do with that.

>> David Ferriero: Amazing.

>> Carla Hayden: Not going to say anything

because he'll steal it because he probably has the patent

to whatever the mixer [laughter] or something like that.

You do. You do.

>> David Ferriero: Well before your time we had a blockbuster

exhibit called What's Cooking Uncle Sam

about the government's role in food which told the story --

a horrible story about testing preservatives and the changes

of the food groups over time.

Did you know butter used to be a food group?

Butter.

>> Carla Hayden: I still think it is.

[ Laughter ]

Yeah I'm for that.

Yeah. Well the -- and I have to talk about your shop.

You just renovated and you have a new education center

and your shop is to die for.

>> David Ferriero: Yeah, I know.

I heard you were trying to steal my shop manager.

>> Carla Hayden: I was scouting.

You know? We're renovating our shop.

We're renovating our shop.

I had to do a field trip and I did talk to the nice lady.

She seems moderately happy.

[ Laughter ]

I mean she did your shop.

She's ready for a new challenge.

>> David Ferriero: We stole her.

You know we stole her from the zoo.

[ Laughter ]

>> Carla Hayden: I'm not saying a word with that one.

I'm letting that go.

>> David Ferriero: In her first year, she introduced socks

into the repertoire and $100,000 worth

of socks in the first year.

>> Carla Hayden: That's right.

>> David Ferriero: Your shop --

the really cool thing about the Archives and the shop is

that when you're in a section and they have sections

that are just wonderful about subjects and eras,

the World War II, and all of this.

There are the terminals right there that connect you

to the collections and what else you can do.

So right when you're making that decision about purchasing,

you also are being tied to the Archives and that.

And that's what really makes it not just a retail experience.

Those are great but the tie in to the content

of the Archives is what really got it.

>> David Ferriero: So then if you've never been

to the National Archives, there are two entrances.

One on Pennsylvania Avenue and one on Constitution Avenue.

The Constitution side is if you want to come in

and see the charters and the exhibits

and the museum side of the house.

And the other side is for research.

You come in that door to use the collection to do research.

And I've been -- since I got there trying to figure

out ways to break that wall.

Break a hole through that wall so that there's more interaction

on both sides so that you get a taste on the museum side

about what's possible.

Genealogists -- genealogy is our biggest market.

Most -- [cheering] -- genealogists than anything else.

Genealogists then Veterans and then everything else after that

but some way to use the experience --

immediate experience from the museum

on the other side in the research.

On the research side to get people more interested

and excited about not just genealogy

but our records in general.

Learning more about our history and more --

most important, learning about civics

and how the government works.

>> Carla Hayden: Yes.

>> David Ferriero: And what the three branches of government are

and what their responsibilities are as American citizens.

That's what --

>> Carla Hayden: Right.

>> David Ferriero: -- I'm trying to figure out.

>> Carla Hayden: [Clapping] Well we all are.

>> This has been a presentation of the Library of Congress.

Visit us at loc.gov.

For more infomation >> Conversation with Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden & Archivist of the United States David Ferriero - Duration: 46:54.

-------------------------------------------

Airlines give US stocks a boost - Duration: 3:07.

For more infomation >> Airlines give US stocks a boost - Duration: 3:07.

-------------------------------------------

Race Heats Up For New Jersey's U.S. Senate Seat - Duration: 2:45.

For more infomation >> Race Heats Up For New Jersey's U.S. Senate Seat - Duration: 2:45.

-------------------------------------------

Turkey files complaint against US steel and aluminum duties to WTO - Duration: 1:42.

Turkey has lodged a complaint at the World Trade Organization against additional U.S.

duties on Turkish steel and aluminium.

For more on this and other news around the world we turn to our Ro Aram…

Aram… the trade dispute between the two countries seems to be escalating….

That's right Mark…

Turkish officials had previously hinted that Ankara would initiate a dispute complaint

with the World Trade Organisation.

The WTO confirmed Monday that it has received the request.

The move comes after U.S. President Donald Trump said earlier this month that he had

authorized the doubling of tariffs on Turkish metal imports.

That would mean the tariff rate on steel would rise to 50 percent and 20 percent for aluminum.

This came amid a row over an American pastor, who is being held in Turkey on terror charges.

Last week, in retaliation, Turkey increased import duties on American goods, such as alcohol

and cars.

The diplomatic rift between the two nations has thrown Turkey's financial markets into

turmoil, with the country's currency dropping to record lows - though it has rebounded slightly.

In its complaint to the WTO, Ankara claimed Washington was violating free trade rules

when it initially imposed steel tariffs on various countries, adding that the doubling

of these rates amounts to an additional violation.

Under dispute consultations, both sides have three months to seek a solution before the

organisation's trade judges get involved.

Turkey joins Canada, Mexico and the EU, among other nations, in filing complaints at the

WTO.

For more infomation >> Turkey files complaint against US steel and aluminum duties to WTO - Duration: 1:42.

-------------------------------------------

Pittsburgh Named 2nd Most Livable City In United States, 32nd Worldwide - Duration: 0:26.

For more infomation >> Pittsburgh Named 2nd Most Livable City In United States, 32nd Worldwide - Duration: 0:26.

-------------------------------------------

Shots fired at US Embassy in Turkey - Duration: 0:59.

For more infomation >> Shots fired at US Embassy in Turkey - Duration: 0:59.

-------------------------------------------

Inter-Korean relations and denuclearization must move forward together: U.S. State Department - Duration: 0:52.

There have been concerns in some quarters that the improvements in inter-Korean ties

are getting ahead of North Korea's denuclearization.

The U.S. State Department, for one, is standing firm in its position that ties must move forward

in step with the denuclearization process.

A State Department official, responding to an enquiry by South Korea's Yonhap News Agency,

said the U.S. is aware that the two Koreas plan to open a joint liaison office in Kaesong.

South Korea has said the project would not violate international sanctions on the North.

The U.S. official wouldn't comment on that issue, but they did say the sanctions will

remain valid until the regime is denuclearized completely.

On Tuesday, VOA cited a State Department official as saying the two Koreas' project to modernize

roads in the North also needs to go in line with Pyongyang's denuclearization.

For more infomation >> Inter-Korean relations and denuclearization must move forward together: U.S. State Department - Duration: 0:52.

-------------------------------------------

US Space Force - What Is It And What Will It Do? (6th US Military Branch) - Duration: 8:39.

Space: the final frontier- and for our modern militaries, the indispensable 'high ground'.

Whereas decades ago, whoever controlled the sky would likely win the war, space has become

the new critical high ground that nations must protect and defend against their enemies

if they want to ensure victory.

In today's episode of The Infographics Show, we ask: Space Force: What Would It Do?

Why is space so important to a modern military?

The answer to that question lies in the unique vantage point that space provides- with a

small constellation of satellites, you can see everything happening in the world at once,

and with cloud-penetrating radar, even a rainy day won't hide the enemy from your sight.

Being able to see means being able to target an enemy with today's high-tech weapons; everything

from cruise missiles to gps guided artillery shells take advantage of advanced recon capabilities

to locate, track, and destroy an enemy.

This is why we don't carpet-bomb our foes the way we used to back in World War II.

But space is important for communications too- typical radio communications only work

for short ranges, thanks to the curvature of the earth, and can be prone to atmospheric

interference or interception/jamming by the enemy.

With a satellite in orbit though, military units can always be in direct communication

with each other, no matter where in the world they are, and satellites allow a military

to deploy advanced and very secure communication technologies that are difficult to intercept

or jam.

Basically, space is important because with eyes in the sky, you can always see your enemy,

and you can always talk to your friends.

And with so many high-tech weapon systems, there's no nation on earth that space is more

important to than the United States, who, with 123 assets in space, has nearly twice

as many military satellites as Russia, the number 2 contender, with 74.

But what would an American Space Force do exactly?

Well, at first it wouldn't be as glamorous as what you see in sci-fi movies, though given

the rate of human technological advancement, it's only a matter of time before we take

to the stars and war inevitably comes with us.

The first job of a US Space Force would be to consolidate all the various space assets

each American military service branch has.

Right now, American military satellites are divided up between the major branches of the

military: the Air Force, Army, and Navy, as well as some of the federal institutions such

as the National Reconnaissance Office.

In the event of a major war, it may be hard to coordinate between all those assets and

share information freely back and forth between the services; this is where the US Space Force

would come in.

By consolidating US space assets into a single branch of the military, the Space Force would

make it easier to coordinate the sharing of critical information and respond to enemy

attempts to sabotage or destroy American military satellites.

Commanders in a battle zone would have just one agency to ask for help from, rather than

trying to get information from multiple agencies at once.

The Space Force would also be tasked with military surveillance and reconnaissance.

It would be responsible for developing new recon technologies and coordinating with American

industry on how to best get them into space.

Once in space, the Space Force would monitor for enemy activity and be ready to immediately

raise the alarm if an attack is suspected.

But Space Force surveillance would also be important during peacetime- in recent years

American space assets have been the leading source of information on the North Korean

nuclear program.

By carefully monitoring suspected test sites, American space assets were able to determine

when underground detonations were taking place, as well as estimating yield and even giving

insights to the type of weapon tested.

Reconnaissance photos of missile test sites showed us how close to building and perfecting

a long-range missile the North Koreans actually were.

In the future, the US Space Force would take over these duties, meaning its members would

have to be on constant alert against rogue states.

Another area of responsibility for the US Space Force would be in the realm of logistics.

Where it would take a day or more to move even just a few pieces of military hardware

from one place to the next by air, sea, or land, an orbital logistics hub could have

that same hardware anywhere in the world in just a few hours.

While this is still currently outside the realm of our technology, it's not as far off

as one might think, and America's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA,

has been looking into what it would take to deliver supplies from orbit to the ground

safely for years.

While in the next few years, we might see orbital drops of hardware such as food, ammunition

and medical supplies, it might not be long before American servicemen are themselves

stationed in orbit and ready to deploy within a moment's notice.

As one senior American official once said, "Getting 2,000 American boots on the ground

anywhere in the world within 2 hours could stop a lot of wars before they even begin."

But why put troops in space if you can put weapons instead?

While the militarization of space is a hot-button topic, and most American defense officials

are not eager to open up another arena of weaponized conflict, the reality is that in

all likelihood someone sooner or later will put physical weapons in space.

Despite the Outer Space Treaty banning weapons of mass destruction in space, it does not

specifically prohibit conventional weapons- a fact that the Soviet Union took advantage

of in the 1970s when it was the first, and only, nation to put a weapon in space.

Installed aboard its Almaz space station, the R-23M Kartech cannon was designed to fire

explosive shells at American space vessels.

But the Kartech was only the tip of the iceberg for what's possible if you really want to

weaponize space.

Known as 'Rods From God' and codenamed Thor, the US military studied the possibility of

creating an orbital strike platform that used nothing more than solid tungsten rods about

20 feet long and 1 foot in diameter to deliver devastating bombardments against enemy installations

or troop concentrations.

Hopelessly outnumbered by the hordes of Soviet tanks that threatened to swallow up Cold War

Europe, American scientists were looking for a way to neutralize large armored columns

without the use of nuclear weapons and thus avoid the risk of nuclear war.

They theorized that using kinetic energy alone, a telephone pole-sized rod made of solid tungsten

and equipped only with a very basic guidance package and a pair of fins, could deliver

a blast along the lines of a small tactical nuclear weapon.

Physics shows that they weren't wrong- dropped from orbit, those rods would have reached

speeds up to ten times the speed of sound.

Since Force = Mass times Acceleration, each rod would have generated an incredible amount

of energy.

Despite President Trump's executive order, the purpose and aim of the US Space Force

is still under official review, with most defense insiders saying that the need for

a dedicated space force isn't yet critical.

Yet as the expansion of the American commercial space industry has shown, humanity's expansion

into the solar system and beyond is inevitable, and as our own history shows: where man goes,

war follows.

Eventually the United States and every other modern nation on earth is going to need a

space force, or be at the mercy of those who have one.

So, what do you think about the US Space Force?

Should the US be preparing for future conflicts now so as to help prevent them in the first

place, or would it only invite other nations to start militarizing space?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments.

Also be sure to check out our other video called Moab - the Mother of All Bombs.

Thanks for watching, and, as always, don't forget to like, share, and subscribe.

See you next time!

For more infomation >> US Space Force - What Is It And What Will It Do? (6th US Military Branch) - Duration: 8:39.

-------------------------------------------

REVEALED: Meghan Markle to visit mother in US but has 'NO PLANS' to visit father Thomas Markle - Duration: 3:11.

For more infomation >> REVEALED: Meghan Markle to visit mother in US but has 'NO PLANS' to visit father Thomas Markle - Duration: 3:11.

-------------------------------------------

Foreign Press Center Briefing - U.S Policy in the Indian Ocean Region - Duration: 29:28.

MODERATOR: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.

Thank you for waiting.

We are very pleased this morning to welcome our senior bureau official for South and Central

Asian Affairs, Ambassador Alice Wells.

She will review her upcoming travel to the Indian Conference – or Indian Ocean Conference,

sorry, and how it supports the Trump administration's Indo-Pacific strategy.

This annual conference is hosted by the India Foundation along with its partners from Singapore,

Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh.

And this year's conference will take place in Hanoi, Vietnam, August 27th to 28th, focusing

on building regional architecture.

You have Ambassador Wells's bio handed out to you from our notice.

Just to remind that we are on record, on camera.

We'll let her make some opening remarks and then I'll open the floor to questions.

And because of constraints, including time, we'll be sticking fairly strictly to this

topic, please.

Thank you very much.

AMBASSADOR WELLS: Thank you.

No, I'm delighted to be here today to talk about how we're building out the Trump administration's

Indo-Pacific strategy and to preview my upcoming participation in the Indian Ocean Conference,

and I'm looking forward to taking your questions.

This whole-of-government strategy, which has been endorsed by President Trump, is rooted

in the fact that the United States is an Indo-Pacific nation and one that's deeply invested in

the broader region.

The United States conducts about $1.4 trillion in two-way trade with the rest of the Indo-Pacific,

more than any other country in the world, and has provided a cumulative 850 billion

in foreign direct investment.

So we naturally want to build our longstanding commitment to the region and have taken some

important steps recently to ensure that the region's future is free and open and operates

on a rule-based system.

At the Indo-Pacific Business Forum last month, Secretary of State Pompeo announced $113 million

in funding for a suite of initiatives in the areas of digital economy, infrastructure,

and energy, including the first-ever U.S. contribution to the Indian Ocean Rim Association.

As he said in his remarks at the forum, these funds represent just a down payment on a new

era in U.S. economic commitment to peace and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific.

Soon after, the United States made a major investment in strengthening our security cooperation

across the region when Secretary Pompeo announced on August 4th nearly $300 million in additional

security assistance for nations spanning the Indo-Pacific.

We are proposing to our Congress that more than $100 million of this funding will go

towards South Asia, including 39 million for Bangladesh, 40 million for Sri Lanka, and

17 million for Nepal.

This investment will focus on maritime security, humanitarian assistance and disaster response,

peacekeeping capabilities, and countering transnational crime, all of which are key

to ensuring a free and open Indo-Pacific.

This announcement also served as the launch of the Bay of Bengal Initiative, which will

enhance the capacity of Bangladesh and Sri Lanka to share shipping information with other

partners in the region such as India to improve detection and response to emerging threats.

The Bay of Bengal, off of India's east coast, is home to important sea lanes linking the

Indian Ocean to East Asia.

And by helping countries like Bangladesh and Sri Lanka improve their maritime domain awareness

capabilities, we can facilitate easier and more secure commerce from the Bay of Bengal

to Pacific markets, including the American market.

As you all know, all the nations of South Asia have expanding populations, dynamic economies,

and ambitions of their own to promote a free and open Indo-Pacific, and we look forward

to discussing with these countries how this contribution can support the Bay of Bengal

and their humanitarian assistance and disaster response priorities.

I'm looking forward to highlighting these major economic and security investments totaling

over 410 million on my upcoming trip to Hanoi, Vietnam, next week for the Indian Ocean Conference.

This annual conference hosted by the India Foundation and our partners in Singapore,

Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh has become an important touchpoint for nations bordering the Indian

Ocean, and it showcases India's rising leadership role in the region.

I had the privilege of attending last year, and so this will be the second time I will

be at the conference.

This year's conference theme, building regional architectures, is timely.

South Asia is the least economically connected region of the world in terms of intraregional

trade, and building a stronger regional institutional architecture is one of my top priorities.

That's why we're expanding our diplomatic engagement with the Indian Ocean Rim Association,

or IORA, including through our recent commitment to the IORA Women's Business Forum.

As an IORA dialogue partner, the United States supports this organization's renewed focus

on a clean maritime economy, women's economic empowerment, and environmental and maritime

security issues.

The United States is also lending its expertise to the Indian Ocean Naval Symposium, which

offers a forum to pursue collective action on regional maritime security issues such

as devastating natural disasters.

The more economically focused organizations of the Bay of Bengal Multi-Sectoral Technical

and Economic Cooperation, BIMSTEC, and the South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation,

SAARC, offer important venues to drive conversations on regional connectivity and infrastructure

priorities.

All of these organizations allow us to build capacity within the Indian Ocean region on

a more wholistic level.

So I look forward to engaging further with our partners at the Indian Ocean Conference

on ways to develop these organizations and pursue initiatives that enhance the region's

security, stability, and prosperity.

And I think Secretary Pompeo summed up our approach well when he said, "Where America

goes, we seek partnership, not dominion*."

And that will certainly be my approach as I head to the region to further build out

the administration's strategy.

And with that, I'd like to take your questions.

Thank you.

*domination

MODERATOR: Thank you very much.

Before we begin, let me just quickly go over a few ground rules.

Those who've been here before know our procedure.

Please wait for a microphone.

When you get the microphone, please identify yourself.

Please limit yourself to one question.

For our colleagues in New York, please step to the podium when you're ready.

I didn't mention this before the opening statement, but for the Q&A period I'll ask

please that we do observe an embargo until the end of the briefing, at which time the

embargo will be lifted.

With that, let me start here, sir.

QUESTION: Can you hear me?

Tom Watkins, Agence France-Presse.

It was a year ago that President Trump unveiled his South Asia strategy.

I was wondering if you could please give us a sense of how countries in the region beyond

Afghanistan have evolved or changed in helping the U.S. in Afghanistan.

More specifically, could you please tell us your sense that you got when you met with

Taliban officials in Doha last month?

What --

MODERATOR: Sir, if I can, I did say that we were going to stick fairly strictly to this

topic.

I'd be happy to take that question, but for today's --

QUESTION: Okay, it's a regional question, so I'm asking about the whole regional South

Asia Strategy, and then the specific about Qatar as well.

Thank you.

MODERATOR: I – we can certainly answer the regional question, but the other one we may

take.

AMBASSADOR WELLS: No, I'd say the South Asia strategy obviously pointed to the role

that India can and should play in supporting the stabilization of Afghanistan.

And I think that was one of the key new features of the strategy, tapping what has been India's

$3 billion commitment to date up to 2020 in support of Afghanistan's economic development.

And I think that we need to see Afghanistan stitched back into the region, and that includes

both north-south trade as well as east-west trade.

And we welcome the fact that India has stepped up and has evinced this commitment and enjoys

a strategic relationship with Afghanistan that does not have to come at the expense

of any other country in the region.

QUESTION: What about Pakistan?

AMBASSADOR WELLS: Pakistan obviously has a critical role to play in the stabilization

of Afghanistan.

We've encouraged Pakistan to take stronger steps to ensure that the Taliban either come

to the negotiating table or are expelled back into Afghanistan rather than enjoy safe haven

outside of the country.

Pakistan and Afghanistan have embarked over the last several months on an effort to improve

their bilateral relationship with the negotiation of a solidary document, which we strongly

support.

And I think we welcome the words of Prime Minister Imran Khan when he discussed the

importance of having peace on both sides of Pakistan's borders.

MODERATOR: We'll take Bingru first, and then we'll go to New York, please.

QUESTION: Thank you very much for this briefing.

Bingru Wang with Hong Kong Phoenix TV.

Ambassador Wells, you mentioned that $113 million is just a down payment.

So is U.S. long-term goal to merely match the investment of – the Chinese investment

in Indo-Pacific region?

And the Chinese foreign minister already said China welcomes U.S. investment, and China

welcomes the real money U.S. put in this region.

I'm wondering if you think the Chinese response to the U.S. strategy in this region is encouraging.

Thank you.

AMBASSADOR WELLS: No, thank you.

And I think you've hit on an issue that really needs to be clarified.

This is not about spending dollar-for-dollar, for instance, compared to the Belt and Road

Initiative.

Rather, this is about untapping or tapping the potential of the American private sector,

which already plays such a crucial role in the region, as I mentioned, with over $850

billion in foreign direct investment.

And so the programs that are being launched by the administration are designed to increase

the capabilities of the American private sector to do what they do best; I mean, to build

projects, to participate in projects that are at the highest international standard,

that are efficient and cost-competitive, and that bring returns to the countries who benefit

from their participation.

And so whether it's the Infrastructure Transaction and Assistance Network, which is going to

be able to pool information and resources for the private sector; whether it's the

specific focus on energy through the EDGE program; or whether it's the steps that

have been taken that are in process now with Congress to double our developmental financing

capacity to $60 billion, all of this is done to spur the private sector to be able to move

out to the region.

We see that the – we understand that the countries of the Indo-Pacific have a huge

need for infrastructure investment.

I mean, some of the estimates are, like, $27 trillion in investment is going to be required

over the next several decades.

And so how do we help countries be able to undertake the development that's critical

to their people's well-being, to their own stability, and to untapping the potential

of this region?

From my focus in the South Asia region, one of the challenges is that the region is so

closed to itself.

And so how do we use our own bilateral programs as well as working multilaterally to facilitate

cross-border trade?

It's easier for India to trade with Brazil than it is with some of its neighboring countries.

That doesn't make sense.

And so how do we as an international community support the kinds of steps that are going

to make it more possible for goods and people and services to flow?

Here I don't think this is at cross purposes or it certainly doesn't need to be at cross

purposes with what China is doing.

Again, we support investment that meets international standards, that's sustainable, that's

transparent, that meets the needs of the countries, and doesn't lock the countries into unsustainable

projects.

We want to have a results-oriented and very constructive bilateral relationship with China.

And obviously, there are always areas of cooperation and areas of tension, but I think in South

Asia many of our objectives are similar.

And so how can we work together to promote increased trade between the countries of the

region and increased economic well-being?

I don't think I need to repeat the words of President Trump, but what we're looking

for are – we're looking for fair and reciprocal trade, and to be able to create the conditions

through a free and open system that allow the – what we've really established since

the end of World War II to continue to the benefit of all the countries of the region.

MODERATOR: All right.

Let me take one from New York and then we'll come back here.

Go ahead, sir.

QUESTION: My name is Mushfiqul Fazal.

I am originally from Bangladesh and I'm representing Just News BD.

Thank you very much for this briefing.

And the assistant secretary, you are closely monitoring the situation of Bangladesh.

As you visited Bangladesh, you met with the ruling prime minister and the opposition leader,

who is in jail now – I believe it is for political reason – and government is not

giving any space, though U.S. is urging for free --

MODERATOR: Hold on, this is supposed to be about the upcoming, okay?

QUESTION: Yeah.

So how you – I – we – as we know, the Ambassador Bernicat, she's urging for the

democracy voting rights, and you are closely monitoring the situation, but government is

accusing Ambassador Bernicat for this as she are giving any --

MODERATOR: This – I don't think this is really the best briefing.

QUESTION: Yeah.

So how – very briefly, how you are monitoring the close – as you are monitoring closely

the situation of Bangladesh, so what is your observation of recent activities in Bangladesh

in terms of democracy and voting rights?

MODERATOR: Sir, I think we'll take that question if you --

AMBASSADOR WELLS: No, I'm happy to answer.

MODERATOR: Okay.

AMBASSADOR WELLS: Bangladesh has an important role to play in the Indo-Pacific strategy.

As one of the countries with a growing economy, a dynamic economy where already Chevron is

the single largest foreign direct investor, the interest in developing Bangladesh's

energy resources, the connectivity potential between Bangladesh and India and other countries,

and what's going to fuel and further fuel Bangladesh's success is the deepening of

its democratic institutions and governing structures.

And so we certainly always encourage the Government of Bangladesh to fulfill its commitment to

hold fair and credible elections that are contested and reflect the will of the Bangladeshi

people.

I think we saw the student protests recently, which really are sort of the purest manifestation

of democracy, where something happens, and citizens rally, and the government responds

to effect reform.

And so we continue to welcome the ability of all groups in Bangladesh to participate

fully in expressing their viewpoints and participate fully in the political process, whether that

is to campaign, to hold peaceful rallies and meetings without intimidation or reprisal.

We certainly condemn anyone who would use violence as a tool in the political process.

But our message is that the stronger and healthier Bangladesh's democratic structures are,

the more appealing the country is to American investors and the more scope we have to be

able to deepen our partnership, which is very much our goal.

MODERATOR: Sir.

QUESTION: Thank you.

This is Jahanzaib Ali from ARY News TV Pakistan.

There were a few media reports that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is visiting Pakistan

in the first week of September.

Can you confirm that?

And secondly, there were also some media reports that you have directly talked to the Taliban

leaders in Qatar.

Can you confirm this news, please?

Thank you so much.

MODERATOR: Why don't I take those right now.

In terms of travel to the region, no travel has been announced for the Secretary beyond

what's already been issued in media notes.

And for your other question, I'd be happy to take it.

But again, the reason I'm holding us to this topic rather strictly is we have limited

time, and I want us to focus on this.

I am trying to encourage Ambassador Wells to come back, and I'm hoping we can have

briefings on other topics at later dates.

QUESTION: Then let me ask another?

(Laughter.)

MODERATOR: Quickly, please.

QUESTION: So about you are asking Pakistan to take actions against Haqqani Network and

Taliban leaders, so do you see any progress in your demands, whatever you are asking Pakistan

for the long time?

I mean, is there kind of any hopes, and especially when there's a new government in Pakistan?

Thank you.

AMBASSADOR WELLS: Well, we look forward to working with the new Government of Pakistan,

and Secretary Pompeo has issued a statement to that effect.

As I said earlier, Pakistan has an important role to play in furthering stability in Afghanistan.

We have expressed our concern over the fact that terrorist proxy groups continue to be

able to enjoy safe haven in Pakistan.

We are urging the government to do more to bring pressure to bear against these organizations

externally-oriented terrorist groups.

And at a time when President Ghani has been so forward-leaning in putting forward a peace

proposal that the international community has rallied around, at a time when the Afghan

people are calling for peace, at a time when we saw the reaction to the initial ceasefire

at Eid al-Fitr, where spontaneously people demonstrated and Taliban foot soldiers demonstrated

that they were tired of war, this is the time for all parties to come to the negotiating

table, and we very much look to Pakistan to reinforce that message.

MODERATOR: Thank you.

Does anyone have a question about Indian Ocean strategy?

QUESTION: Yes, I do.

(Laughter.)

MODERATOR: All right, I will take you first and then you second, and then we'll go to

New York.

QUESTION: Ambassador, I'm Seema Sirohi.

I write for the Economic Times.

I wanted to ask you about the Quad.

How do you see the progress of this group; do you think India is hesitant; how do you

assess Australia's assessment of coming together?

Second question: Is Quad a part of the broader Indo-Pacific strategy?

Because some diplomats say things should not be conflated because it makes China feel nervous.

If you could elaborate, please.

AMBASSADOR WELLS: The Quad is one of many diplomatic architecture that we're using

to try to promote the Indo-Pacific strategy.

Obviously, the role of ASEAN is critical, and you've seen as the Secretary at the

August 4th ASEAN Ministerial use that as the forum to announce the latest measures that

we're taking to build out our Indo-Pacific strategy.

But in addition to ASEAN we have a variety of trilateral, quadrilateral groupings that

have existed where particularly countries that are very likeminded – so the U.S.,

India, Japan, Australia – are able to coordinate our approaches to the region, to espouse standards,

whether it's standards for infrastructure, or identify areas where our development tools

can be overlapping and reinforcing.

If you look in Nepal, for instance, where we have brought – there's a 630 million

Millennium Challenge Corporation project underway to create electricity and transmission lines

and road networks that very much dovetails with projects that Japan is doing to build

transmission line and roads.

And so how do we be more strategic in targeting and ensuring that countries have options as

they consider how best to move forward?

So no, the Indo-Pacific strategy is for everyone, and it's about underscoring a series of

norms and a commitment to both the free and the open, and it's not locked into any one

format.

We'll use all of our diplomatic engagements across the region to reinforce these principles.

I think that there is interest in the parties both trilaterally and quadrilaterally to deepen

the work.

You've seen ministerials held on the margins of the UN General Assembly.

We've met at the working level twice in the last year and are really trying now to

put meat on the bones, like how do we develop the specific areas that we can demonstrate

to the international community and to the countries of the region that we are able to

effectively work together?

One issue – I mean one example I would highlight is that OPIC and the Japanese development

authority now have an MOU; we can work together more effectively.

We're trying to break down barriers that prevent us from working more seamlessly with

our close partners.

MODERATOR: Thank you.

Ma'am.

QUESTION: Hi, Ambassador.

I'm Reena Bhardwaj.

I write for ANI and also represent CNN News 18 here.

My question is on Maldives.

With the elections that are coming up in September, now Maldives is such a – geopolitically

is such a strong space for India as well as the United States.

What is your take on that?

And secondly, is there going to be any talks with India in the upcoming dialogue, or in

the meeting ahead?

AMBASSADOR WELLS: Obviously we're very concerned about the situation in Maldives and the weakening

of democratic institutions, and the elections I think are going to be very closely watched

to see whether it's possible for the opposition, most of – many of whom who have been arrested,

to contest and to be able to put forward and present an alternative, as is normal in any

democratic system, to the current President Yameen.

The Maldives is an important country in the Indo-Pacific framework given the volume of

trade that flows through this area.

The – we've welcomed in the past the close cooperation with the Maldives and we've

welcomed India's close cooperation with the Maldives, and I think the quality and

the character of our bilateral relationship with Maldives will very much be shaped by

what we see happening during this election process.

With India, we are looking forward to the inaugural 2+2 dialogue with Secretaries Pompeo

and Mattis traveling for these meetings in New Delhi on September 6th.

It's an important opportunity to discuss and enhance our engagement on a range of diplomatic

and security priorities, and it really is an indication of the deepening strategic partnership

that we enjoy with India.

It is going – India plays a central role in U.S. national security.

It's enshrined in the President's National Security Strategy, as well as the administration's

South Asia and Indo-Pacific strategies.

Our partnership is really rooted in values and shared democratic values and a commitment

to a rules-based order, and I think what we're looking for at the upcoming 2+2 ministerial

is to discuss how do we operationalize India's status as a major defense partner.

As you know, we've gone from essentially zero dollars in defense cooperation in 2008

to as much as $18 billion today.

We do more military exercises with India than with any other country in the world, but how

do we take this partnership to a new level so that it's not just going to be defense

acquisitions but really a way of framing how we see challenges and how we want to be able

to respond together to address these challenges.

So I think we're going to be able to demonstrate at the 2+2 the facts of this maturing partnership.

MODERATOR: Thank you.

We'll go to New York.

Sir.

QUESTION: Yeah.

Thank you, Ambassador Wells.

This is Manik Mehta.

I'm a syndicated journalist.

My question relates to Indo-American cooperation.

Do you envisage any cooperation in terms of trade and infrastructure in the Indo-Pacific

region, specifically with regard to the ASEAN region?

And also, there have been some voices recently in the ASEAN group, particularly in Singapore,

of reviving the TPP.

Is that something realistic?

AMBASSADOR WELLS: The United States remains committed to sort of this open and free trading

system throughout the Indo-Pacific.

And with respect to the TPP, I mean, already we have bilateral free trade agreements with

six of the eleven countries, and I think with most of the remaining we have trade and investment

framework agreements.

So again, our commitment to engaging with these countries and creating favorable trade

conditions is obvious.

With respect to Indo-American cooperation, we see trade with India and opening up trade

with India as a key strategic objective for this administration.

Our bilateral trade is now at about $126 billion, an increase I think of more than 10 billion

from last year.

We've seen critical purchases by Indian firms in the aviation, commercial aviation

sector; energy sector; obviously the defense sector, which I just spoke about – the zero

to $18 billion increase.

But still, impediments do remain.

Tariffs and non-tariff barriers have been a subject of longstanding concern, and intellectual

property rights as well.

And so we're continuing a very intensive dialogue with the Indian Government on how

do we address these irritants and unlock the trade that is of great interest to U.S. firms

when they look at the Indian market and its potential.

Looking outside of India, yes, we want to work together with India, identify projects,

whether it's in Sri Lanka or Nepal or further afield.

We have a track record – I think one of the great new elements of our relationship

with India is that we are working in third parties and third countries.

We started doing that at an assistance level, a developmental level, where we work together

in Africa on some health-related issues, on peacekeeping, training.

We've worked together on programs involving Afghans, bringing Afghans to India for training,

which can be done at lower cost and greater effectiveness.

So India really is a all-weather partner as we look ahead to how to ensure that the Indo-Pacific

remains free and open.

MODERATOR: Thank you very much.

We have time for one more and we'll take this one here, please.

QUESTION: Thank you, Ambassador.

Kitty Wang with NTD TV.

In the recent remarks by the assistant secretary of DOD, Randy Schriver, he mentioned that

much of China's behavior, he thought that demonstrated the objective that's counter

to the U.S. objective of a free, open Indo-Pacific region.

So – and as China keep on expanding its influence and footprint in the Indo-Pacific

region, how will you address these challenges in this upcoming conference?

Thank you.

AMBASSADOR WELLS: Again, I mean, we welcome contributions by China to regional development

as long as they adhere to high standards, including transparency, rule of law, and sustainable

financing.

And so we've expressed concerns over projects in countries where the countries and governments

involved have not been able to sustain the repayment schedules that has resulted in effectively

a loss of sovereignty over key infrastructure that they've had to turn over to their lenders,

in this instance China.

And so as long as China is prepared to support the integration of the region in ways that

are sustainable and don't mortgage these individual countries' futures to unrealistic

and unsustainable loan terms, then I think there's very much a way that we can work

together.

From the South Asia perspective, when I look at South Asia, I see many areas where our

interests with China overlap.

We want to see an end to terrorism.

We want to see increase – we want to see peace in Afghanistan, the stabilization of

Afghanistan.

We both support improved Afghanistan-Pakistan relations.

I think that basis of overlapping interests gives us a good conversation to start from.

MODERATOR: I want to thank Ambassador Wells very much for coming in today.

Thank you all for coming.

I know we left several questions out there so I'm going to stay here to take them now

by hand, if you like, or you can email them to me at weberb@state.gov.

Thank you very much.

QUESTION: Thank you.

AMBASSADOR WELLS: Thank you very much.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét